Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Blog

No Kidding, 2G for E-Call

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 4
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Missed opportunity
junko.yoshida   7/24/2013 8:31:21 AM
NO RATINGS
To me, using 2G for newly minted eCall box (to be rolled out in 2015) strikes as a huge missed opportunity. 

By investing in LTE, for example, like what GM is planning to do, there seems to be a variety of business opportunities for carmakers to mine. Am I wrong about that?

bobdvb
User Rank
Manager
Re: Security
bobdvb   7/24/2013 8:30:22 AM
NO RATINGS
An educational video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU8hg4FTm0g

3G isn't totally secure but 2G allows the base station to tell the phone to turn off the security mechanisms and 2G devices by default trust *any* base station.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Security
junko.yoshida   7/24/2013 8:17:52 AM
NO RATINGS
EU's eCall does not mandate which cellular connection the eCall box needs to use. 

So, it is a choice left to automakers.

Why is 2G less secure than 3G in eCall implementation? Could you please educate me on that? Thanks!

bobdvb
User Rank
Manager
Security
bobdvb   7/24/2013 3:20:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Not only is E-Call a massive waste of money, but if it is going to have 2G technology it won't be secure! It is now trivial to mess with 2G so I worry about the consequences.

<<   <   Page 4 / 4
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week