Breaking News
Blog

How Will President Obama Rule on Apple vs. Samsung?

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
BrianBailey
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Obama overturned the ban
BrianBailey   8/5/2013 1:53:52 AM
NO RATINGS


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000042406

m00nshine
User Rank
Manager
Re: Obama overturned the ban
m00nshine   8/4/2013 9:37:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Apple spent $1.9mil lobbying US government in 2012 and Samsung spent zero. President overturns ITC verdict after ITC rules for Samsung that apple violated patents. See opensecrets.org Apple files patent suit in home state of California, convinces jury they own rectangles with rounded corners, jury falsely awards $1bil in damages. Hard not to feel like samsung has no chance for fair treatment in US.

Susan Rambo
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Obama overturned the ban
Susan Rambo   8/4/2013 7:32:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Wow. Thanks, Rick. Here's the link to the veto letter.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Charles.Desassure
User Rank
Manager
It's Election time again...
Charles.Desassure   8/3/2013 11:45:40 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for your wonderful article and trying to explain a complicated process such as the American government, the Court of International trade (CIT) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) laws within and article.  You have indeed earned your paycheck  for the year.  But this is not a situation that will be solved within a few years.  It is likely that everyone will go back to court and there will be more appeals.  You see, in America, if you have money, there is always a hidden law that can be applied if lawyers have more time to research information for the case.  In terms of being heard by the President in this case.  President Obama has more pressing issues like foreign affairs to be concerned about at this time.  By the time this issue goes to court again.... it will be election time.  I look forward to seeing your follow article to this one within the next few years.

DesDizzy
User Rank
Rookie
Re: More twists and turns
DesDizzy   8/2/2013 8:25:15 PM
NO RATINGS
As usual we are making something complicated which is really quite simple. Samsung is trying to abuse the FRAND process to gain a competitive advantage. This is clear from its actions in the US and Europe. The case should be thrown out and judicial action should be taken against Samsung. I'm not sure if Samsung is an advertiser withinEET and this is the reason why your publication is reluctant to criticise Samsung. They have been shown to be very comfortable in cheating (gaming performance scores in their devices), stealing intelectual property, paying to have developers marketing their products and paying for bloggers to disparage competitor products on sites like this. Lets not beat about the bush here.


_hm
User Rank
CEO
Diplomatic Truce
_hm   8/2/2013 6:27:58 PM
NO RATINGS
As evident from common sense there is no correct answer. Obama can work well as diplomat and with its power of language and being president, will create truce between Apple and Samsung.

 

Wnderer
User Rank
CEO
Re: Nada
Wnderer   8/2/2013 2:21:09 PM
NO RATINGS
You might be interested in the article "The Rise of the Fourth Branch of Government"

http://jonathanturley.org/2013/05/26/the-rise-of-the-fourth-branch-of-government/


"The judiciary, too, has seen its authority diminished by the rise of the fourth branch. Under Article III of the Constitution, citizens facing charges and fines are entitled to due process in our court system. As the number of federal regulations increased, however, Congress decided to relieve the judiciary of most regulatory cases and create administrative courts tied to individual agencies. The result is that a citizen is 10 times more likely to be tried by an agency than by an actual court. In a given year, federal judges conduct roughly 95,000 adjudicatory proceedings, including trials, while federal agencies complete more than 939,000."

BrianBailey
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Why only older iPhones?
BrianBailey   8/2/2013 1:40:31 PM
NO RATINGS
The same applies to any of the other courts. If a product were not included in the original suit there has been no discovery on the new device to determine if it infringes. Now in the case it is an essential patent, so not as clear that any discovery would have been required,

tpfj
User Rank
CEO
Re: Why only older iPhones?
tpfj   8/2/2013 1:23:31 PM
NO RATINGS
So if a company keeps adding one to each product release, even though essentially the same product, they avoid an ITC ruling? Seems broken to me and an easy way to escape a ban?

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week