Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Blog

Verification Panel: Are We Done Yet? Not Even Close

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Graham Bell
User Rank
Freelancer
Application Specific Static Formal Verification is Making the Difference
Graham Bell   8/28/2013 5:50:36 PM
NO RATINGS
At the Design and Verification Conference last February, there was a panel ("Where Does Design End and Verification Begin?") that discussed the impact of new verification tools that focus on just one problem area and thereby enable more effective verifcation.  Engineers no longer have to create a solution out of their own dynamic simulator, static analyzer, or ABV tools.   

In the example of Meridian clock-domain-crossing (CDC) verification,  a mix of structural, formal and dynamic methods operating under-the-hood, ensure that an SoC will not fail with a metastability issue.   Other examples are state-of-the art Lint analysis, and X-propagation and reset verfication / optimization.

At Real Intent, we call this new category Static Verfication.   Gary Smith calls them Verification Apps. I see these as important addition to our tool chest so engineers don't design SoCs that we cannot verify.

 


JanineLove
User Rank
Blogger
When are we done?
JanineLove   9/4/2013 9:35:34 AM
NO RATINGS
This reminds me of the issues in software test. There's no clear time to "blow the whistle and we're done" anymore. It is a bit scary. Especially with mission critical apps.

Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week