Breaking News
Blog

Get the Circuit on Temperature Measurement

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Blogger
interesting
Caleb Kraft   10/29/2013 12:46:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for that.  I don't have an engineering degree and was actually kind of curious how they handled temp sensing. This gives me some decent insight.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
CEO
simple principle
wilber_xbox   10/29/2013 12:50:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Temperature measurement is simple but the accuracy is more important. 0.5 oC is quite good accuracy given the simple design.

tom-ii
User Rank
Blogger
Re: interesting
tom-ii   10/29/2013 1:40:21 PM
NO RATINGS
I'll say that the posted article is quite a bit shorter than the original ..  Part of that was handled by the link to the older thermocouple article.

 

I think every one of us has gotten it "wrong" before (if not still).  Extra sources of error also come from the calibration curve of that thermistor (the PT1000) and the junction of diddimilar metals at contact points (e.g. thermocouple lead to copper PCB trace).  Dissimilar metals in contact with each other present a "galvanic" potential (this is how a battery works, right?), where other impurities/humidity act as the electrolyte.  (thus the source of "galvanic corrosion")

Also, the variance in "on channel resistance" over temperature of the analog mux may well be a significant percentage of error in this circuit (from the part's datasheets)

 

But I ramble...

 

  You're welcome ;)

tom-ii
User Rank
Blogger
Re: simple principle
tom-ii   10/29/2013 1:44:40 PM
NO RATINGS
I am iinclied to believe their accuracy is likely a bit lower than that, or that they have used their calibration source to eke out some extra accuracy.

There are a lot of sources for error in that circuit, many of which are hard to calibrate out (without NIST-traceable hardware), and that sort of defeats the point of it being "low cost," I think.

No to rip on them, I think it's a neat little circuit/idea, but repeatability but it's good to know "going in" what you hurdles you might expect...

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: interesting
MeasurementBlues   10/29/2013 10:32:07 PM
NO RATINGS
@Caleb, ping me sometime about temperature measurement. I came from that business.

We have a nice technical discussion going on at EDN. My article there gets into more detail.

David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
Re: interesting
David Ashton   10/29/2013 11:19:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi Caleb.  I don't have an engineering degree either - so I am glad I am in such good company!!   but I digress....   Temperature measurement.....  I have been doing some articles for Max recently on the PICAXE MCUs.  The first one is posted, the second will be up soon but in the third, which I am working on at present, I am dealing with the Dallas-Maxim DS18B20 digital temperature sensors.  Accuracy of 0.5 deg C, from -55 to +125, and the interface to the PICAXE, and reading them,  is REALLY easy,  Not in the same league as the thermocouple system in the EDN article, but for a quick easy temp measurement I don't think you could get easier.  I'll try and ping you again when the relevant article is up.

David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
Wrong link
David Ashton   10/29/2013 11:41:13 PM
NO RATINGS
MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Wrong link
MeasurementBlues   11/4/2013 8:34:17 AM
NO RATINGS
@David, Thanks for pointing out the link to page 2 of the article. I've updated the link at now it goes to page 1.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
Re: simple principle
MeasurementBlues   11/4/2013 8:39:07 AM
NO RATINGS
tomii, presumable, if you wre to build this circuit, you've calibrate it using some other instrument that is NIST traceable. At the very least, you'd compare the measurement circuit against something you trust, NIST traceable or not.

Calibration is all based on trusting the device you're using as a standard. I've been to stadarnds labs where they people compare the latest temperature-measuring instruments, with 4-wire RTDs and 20+ bits of resolution against glass thermometers. Sounds crazy, right? But, the glass thermometers was the trusted instrument. The high-end digital device was an unknown.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Blogger
A similar measurement article
MeasurementBlues   11/4/2013 8:47:03 AM
NO RATINGS
See Aubrey Kagan's article Current Measurement, Part 1. Four-wire conecpts there are similar to measuring temperature with an RTD.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week