Breaking News
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
David Ashton
User Rank
Author
Re: Operation Crossbow
David Ashton   1/23/2014 6:57:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks - the 1960 Time Machine is there too

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0054387/?ref_=fn_al_tt_2

I should try and get these movies and see if I like them now as much as I did then.....

Stargzer
User Rank
Author
Re: Operation Crossbow
Stargzer   1/23/2014 6:43:52 PM
NO RATINGS
@David:  Operation Crossbow at Internet Movie Database, with Sophia Loren!

David Ashton
User Rank
Author
Re: Old-fashioned Displays
David Ashton   1/23/2014 5:04:41 PM
NO RATINGS
I remember that movie!  It was really good as I remember, though it was about 45 years ago I saw it - during one of our movie nights at boarding school.  I didn't remember that the female star was Yvette Mimieux, but I seem to remember her character was called Weena?  I remember she was pretty cute (maybe I was older than you were when I saw it :-), so did someone else, as I saw the name carved into a schooldesk some weeks later.

I dimly also remember the typeface on the panel - it was rather ornate.  I must try and get the movie again.

Totally off-track, but another movie I saw at the same boarding school was "Operation Crossbow", about the V1 and V2 rockets in WW2.  Fascinating as I remember, but I have never seen it again either.  A visit to Ebay is indicated I think.

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: holding on to defunct parts
Max The Magnificent   1/23/2014 2:51:52 PM
NO RATINGS
@zewde: ...everyone understands the uefulness of use but no one understands the use of the useless...

My head hurts :-)

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: Old-fashioned Displays
Max The Magnificent   1/23/2014 2:48:46 PM
NO RATINGS
@betajet: The fact that I found this more interesting than Yvette Mimieux shows that...

You are a very strange person indeed LOL

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
holding on to defunct parts
zewde yeraswork   1/23/2014 2:47:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Holding onto that which seems to no longer have any use is an important way to remain cutting edge without actuaollly remaining cutting edge...everyone understands the uefulness of use but no one understands the use of the useless.

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: Retro-Futuristic
Max The Magnificent   1/23/2014 2:38:15 PM
NO RATINGS
@Stargzer: It's definitely Retro-Futuristic, almost Steampunk...

Have you been following my Prognostication Engine blogs? Like the recent one on lighting up vacuum tubes using tri-state LEDs (this links to the earlier ones)

betajet
User Rank
Author
Old-fashioned Displays
betajet   1/23/2014 2:36:30 PM
NO RATINGS
My favorite numeric display is the one on The Time Machine control panel in the 1960 movie.  The numbers are beautifully rendered in a 19th Century typeface.  The fact that I found this more interesting than Yvette Mimieux shows that (1) I was pretty young when I saw the movie, and (2) definitely a born engineer.

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: Nixies
Max The Magnificent   1/23/2014 2:34:31 PM
NO RATINGS
@Stargzer: Back in Ancient Times...

I remember them well :-)

Stargzer
User Rank
Author
Retro-Futuristic
Stargzer   1/23/2014 2:31:22 PM
NO RATINGS
@Luke Miller

That last photo is so cool!  It's definitely Retro-Futuristic, almost Steampunk (or are you planning to replace the engine, too?).

Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed