Breaking News
Blog

M2M Test Equipment Will Be Needed & Soon

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
sobaka73
User Rank
Author
Re: Sharing the same view on IoT and M2M test and diagnostics tools
sobaka73   2/6/2014 6:54:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi-- Thanks for your feedback! To further discuss this topic, please email my PR representative, Jeannette Garcia at Jeannette.Garcia@frost.com so that she can schedule a time to talk.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Re: T&M needed for M2M can be viewed in terms of Design,Deployment& Maintenance!
MeasurementBlues   2/6/2014 5:02:15 PM
NO RATINGS
@Vishnu, A longer version of your comment would make a good post in itself. Would you like to attain a blogger rank and write a piece?

RubiElbirt
User Rank
Author
Sharing the same view on IoT and M2M test and diagnostics tools
RubiElbirt   2/6/2014 5:40:44 AM
NO RATINGS
Hello Olga,
  I read in your blog a post entitled "M2M Test Equipment Will Be Needed & Soon" and I found it in line with our view.
I'd like to have a short call/correspondance with you to exchange ideas and even investigate possible cooperation.
Please feel free to contact me back at rubi@perytons.com, +972-523172020.
Best Regards,
  Rubi Elbirt - VP Business Development and Sales, www.perytons.com

Vishnu Goel
User Rank
Author
T&M needed for M2M can be viewed in terms of Design,Deployment& Maintenance!
Vishnu Goel   2/2/2014 1:26:46 AM
NO RATINGS
Olga,this piece of research on M2M market is very timely, as the new buzzword in industry is " Internet of Everything" being touted as the 20T$ opportunity and changing the face of Data & TeleCommunication both.There is a move to connect all devices among,between and to the cloud.So the requirement of T&M will be there for all layers of the OSI as well as the phases of the Deployment: ie Design,Production,Installation,Maintenance,Integration and After-Market.We need to see which "things" are likely to get connected in the next 2-3 years and derive the appropriate T&M products needed by the market.Vishnu Goel T&M +919810101238

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed