Breaking News
Blog

Reverse Engineering Isn't a Dirty Word

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Blogger
Hmmm
Max The Magnificent   2/27/2014 11:54:30 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
I can certainly see the argument that reverse engineering is appropriate when it comes to checking for IP infringement.

But if someone kills themselves designing anything and someone else comes along and reverse engineers it and then creates and sells copies of it -- I cannot see how that is in any way not considered to be stealing.

On the other hand ... as an end user in the 1980s ... I do remember liking the fact that a lot of the components I used were "second-sourced" -- I just don't recall thinking about what that actually meant.

LB_Engineer
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Hmmm
LB_Engineer   2/27/2014 3:26:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Max,

"Stealing" someone else's design as you describe it is not RE, it is chip piracy.  Chip piracy was always unethical and it is illegal since 1984.  Second sourcing in pre-1984 style was practiced by the semiconductor companies but its questionable ethics unfairly tainted the entire business of RE.  That is the image I wanted to clear.

 

RE is fundamentally about learning.  I never forget the amount of knowledge I gained by dissecting and Bob Widlars' LM10, in the early 80s.   The knowledge I gained about his new design concepts such as the use of merged PNP/NPN structures, the use of controlled amounts of positive feedback in a real-to-GND output stage and so on, was worth a few semesters of university lectures.  It took me about three weeks to do all that learning.  From there I went on to create my own patented opamp architecture that was much smaller in die area.  That allowed me to place ten opamps on a single chip in 1982.   Granted, no big deal now, but it was much harder to do that in those years.  This is what RE is all about.

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Hmmm
Max The Magnificent   2/27/2014 3:30:28 PM
NO RATINGS
@LB_Engineer: RE is fundamentally about learning.

Now, I can happily agree with the use of RE as a learning tool -- if I take myself away from the semiconductor industry and consider a mechanical contraption, for example, I can well see myself wanting to take it to bits to see how it works.

dgreigml1
User Rank
Rookie
Reverse Persictive
dgreigml1   2/27/2014 10:59:26 PM
NO RATINGS

Okay, this way off whack, but I have always found inspiration from reading maths/physics/chemistry and optics books whilst sat atop the toilet throne.

Born and Wolf, Chapter 1 "Maxwell's Equations" must scare the pants off a fresher but a seasoned electronic engineer can skip that chapter and find a few good bits betwixt the covers.

boblespam
User Rank
CEO
Nature reverse engineering
boblespam   2/28/2014 2:44:25 AM
NO RATINGS
Theres is also Nature reverse engineering, which is quite fun and with no risk to be considered as illegal or unethical. Anybody here has practical experience in that domain ?

ologic
User Rank
Rookie
Ethically chalenged
ologic   2/28/2014 4:46:08 AM
NO RATINGS
How about filing for a patent on the process of finding a company that protected an invention via trade secret, figuring out what that secret is, patenting it ... and then suing the original company ?

Fiction ? Think again :

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081107/0118162765.shtml

dgreigml1
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Nature reverse engineering
dgreigml1   2/28/2014 4:50:09 AM
NO RATINGS
Reincarnation? Mental masturßbastion perhaps? I suppose there may be a turd option.

There again perhaps a 4th, speaking as a Buddhist, messed it up in this life so reincarnation is high on the Natures hand of cards, preferance Snow Tiger, Snow Leopard or Peregrine, Ladakh would be lovely.

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
CEO
re:
prabhakar_deosthali   2/28/2014 7:17:04 AM
NO RATINGS
Reverse engineering is a fun, whatever be the legality or illegality behind it.

Way back in 1988, as a free lance assignment, i really enjoyed the reverse engineering of the MS-DOS "debug "program . I used the "debug" program itself to understand its working, its data structures and successfully ported it onto a locally made 8086 development kit.

In my opinion, reverse engineering is a very good learning tool for engineers!

 

 

HankWalker
User Rank
Manager
Sometimes You RE Your Own Products
HankWalker   2/28/2014 12:06:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Reverse engineering must also be used when you are making modifications, improvements, additions to an existing hardware or software product with poor or no documentation (or designers) available. One time I needed to know something, and one designer was on pregnancy leave and the other one was on a honeymoon in Tahiti! At least I knew who the designers were, but I still had to reverse engineer the system to get the answer I needed.

In some sense, reverse engineering is about keeping the system model in sync with the implementation. Or creating a system model if you can't find one.

 

AZskibum
User Rank
CEO
Re: Sometimes You RE Your Own Products
AZskibum   2/28/2014 12:33:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Absolutely! Reverse engineering is often an essential skill when you are tasked with modifying your own company's existing product or re-using IP. Designers come & go, and documentation often lacks important details that another designer needs to know in order to successfully modify a product or IP block. Black box reuse (don't change anything) is a luxury you don't always have on a new product. As soon as you hear the words "reuse with a few changes," it's time to bring out those reverse engineering skills!

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
How to Cope with a Burpy Comet
October 17, 2pm EDT Friday
EE Times Editorial Director Karen Field interviews Andrea Accomazzo, Flight Director for the Rosetta Spacecraft.