Breaking News
Blog

FinFETs Not the Best Silicon Road

NO RATINGS
2 saves
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 5 / 5
3D Guy
User Rank
Manager
Intel's cost per transistor different
3D Guy   3/27/2014 6:49:06 PM
Intel's Mark Bohr shows cost per transistor scaling for them upto 10nm. However, fabless vendors like nVidia and Broadcom have been complaining about cost per transistor scaling.

Its commonly known in the industry that TSMC is the only option for 16nm/20nm for most fabless companies (since it has 16nm/20nm yielding and has availability). If TSMC has no competition, it can charge whatever it wants... do you think that is a reason for the disconnect between cost per transistor scaling at TSMC and Intel?

Or do you think the cost difference is cos' of Intel scaling its BEOL between 22nm and 14nm, unlike TSMC?

Or do you think Intel is able to scale better and yield better due to more regular layouts (which use cheaper litho steps)?

From what I'm hearing, the lack of competition for TSMC is a major reason for cost per transistor not scaling for fabless companies. That problem won't be solved with FD-SOI. 

EdwinP0
User Rank
Rookie
40,000 wafers/minute!!!!
EdwinP0   3/27/2014 6:47:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Did you mean 40,000/month?

<<   <   Page 5 / 5
Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll