Breaking News
Blog

20nm Dilemma Explained

NO RATINGS
1 saves
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
krisi
User Rank
CEO
Re: SOI users at 20nm?
krisi   4/8/2014 10:26:49 AM
NO RATINGS
any leaks what the announcement might be @SOI lady?

SOI lady
User Rank
Rookie
Re: SOI users at 20nm?
SOI lady   4/8/2014 10:21:43 AM
NO RATINGS
And be patient... STMicroelectronics will soon be announcing a "major foundry player" that will be both a dual FD-SOI manufacturing source for ST, plus an open source for the industry.  This important piece of news came out of the company's Q4 and FY13 presentation in Paris on January 28th.... 

Adele.Hars
User Rank
Rookie
Re: SOI users at 20nm?
Adele.Hars   4/7/2014 4:24:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Rick, try the FD-SOI Design Community on LinkedIn for more (not just ST) insight. The FDSOI crowd jumps from 28 to 14nm - not bothering w/20nm --altho Handel is a purist w/respect to nomenclature, it seems ;-) -- anyway, when he says 20nm, the FDSOI folks call it 14nm (that's what they're going head-to-head with, after all). Soitec also has good info - see latest ASN on Gen2FDSOI (28nm performance beats 20nm bulk (and costs 50% less); 14nm matches FinFET (at 20% lower cost). http://www.advancedsubstratenews.com/2014/03/fd-soi-back-to-basics-for-best-cost-energy-efficiency-and-performance/. Also CMP has a been seeing good results in their MPW runs - they've got 140+ users of the 28nm FDSOI PDK (which granted, is provided by ST/Leti) -- hear they're pretty pleased with the results they're seeing.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
SOI users at 20nm?
rick merritt   4/7/2014 2:51:02 PM
NO RATINGS
In all this lively debate I have not heard of any SOI users beyond STM. Any others out there?

HJ88
User Rank
Freelancer
Additional Inputs
HJ88   4/7/2014 11:48:13 AM
NO RATINGS
1. Have detailed data on wafer cost and die cost which support projections shown. The cost data shown was not provided by STM, but independently developed by IBS.

2. FinFETs will ramp into high volume production. The questions are:
  • When?
  • How much of the market will FinFETs take in the time frame through 2017?

The area of concern is for mobile platforms because of the cost challenges.

3. Qualcomm 810 and 808 are very impressive products, and the target for initial devices is H1/2015. Will tie into Mobile World Congress (Barcelona).

Is it realistic to expect the next-generation products in FinFETs in H1/2016, or is H1/2017 a more realistic projection?

Qualcomm is the volume leader from a foundry perspective along with potentially Apple.

4. Are there other options that are more cost-effective?

Fully agree that without a strong supply chain, FD SOI will not become widely adopted. Key question is whether there will be support outside of STM. Any ideas?

resistion
User Rank
CEO
FDSOI wafer cost compensation?
resistion   4/6/2014 10:12:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Clearly the big cost issue for FDSOI is the special wafer preparation with only some nm thin Si. On the other hand, it has been claimed FDSOI is implant-free so there is some cost reduction there.

As said earlier, the deal breaker is self-heating.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Talking around the actual point
resistion   4/6/2014 9:45:56 AM
NO RATINGS
I think no one has disagreed that 28 nm bulk planar is the cheap(est) starting point. Going to FDSOI or FinFET adds cost, and going to 20 nm adds cost. With the added cost of FDSOI or FinFET, the shrink should be beyond 20 nm to make up, but is 14 nm even enough? Especially with increased lithography costs at 14 nm only adding to the costs?

HangLai
User Rank
Rookie
The author is exaggerate his knowledge.
HangLai   4/6/2014 9:26:39 AM
NO RATINGS
The author is exaggerate his knowledge.  The industrial is not moving into SOI for some time to come.

Fottemberg
User Rank
Rookie
Like 2003
Fottemberg   4/6/2014 8:39:04 AM
NO RATINGS
The same situation of 2002/2003, when AMD chose the SOI process for ClawHammer. The problems were numerous, but this decision revealed itself good for AMD, if we see at the recent past. http://www.geek.com/chips/amd-paid-ibm-46-million-to-solve-some-soi-problems-552954/


Today AMD has to do a gamble, and FD-SOI could be a good pick (like Altera and Intel alliance).





3D Guy
User Rank
Manager
Finfets the industry's solution to the problem
3D Guy   4/6/2014 12:53:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, the industry has moved to Finfets to solve the problems with bulk. It's going to be difficult for FDSOI to become mainstream now. A few points: (1) Yes, Finfets when executed properly give significantly lower wafer costs than FDSOI. That's what I heard from both Intel and TSMC people who made the decision in their respective companies. (2) SOITEC is known to have significant yield problems getting 5nm or 8nm thin SOI uniformly across the wafer. I heard some bad yield numbers from their employees. The $500 wafer cost assumption is optimistic. (3) With AMD moving away from SOI and the industry choosing Finfets over FDSOI, SOITEC is in trouble. It's been funding various marketing pushes by hiring consultants and third parties who push SOI... They also fund the SOI consortium. Some of the recent stuff about SOI in the press comes from those efforts. If you speak with decision makers in companies, they say Finfets WHEN EXECUTED WELL, are better, cheaper and more scalable. (4) SOITEC was formed to commercialize the French Govt's (CEA/LETI's) SOI invention. So, ST Micro, which gets a lot of funding from the French govt, is pushing the technology.

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.