Breaking News
Blog

Free Energy Live In Action

NO RATINGS
1 saves
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Javier F
User Rank
Rookie
Re: There are many suckers out there..
Javier F   5/13/2014 6:56:51 AM
NO RATINGS
I am a little sad for the disappointment, at least I keep waiting for the arrival of hoverboards on december (http://huvrtech.com/)  XD

CARCODE
User Rank
Rookie
Re: There are many suckers out there..
CARCODE   5/12/2014 11:55:18 AM
NO RATINGS
Small device and investors can use Energous power (WATT)  http://energous.com/

HankWalker
User Rank
Manager
As The Wizard Said
HankWalker   5/12/2014 11:54:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. Maybe Max the Magnificent would say this. When I saw the story title, I thought it was related to a colleague's idea for generating electricity from the skin to ambient temperature differential (which can go either way in Texas). His approach can generate microwatts from reasonable surface area (e.g. Samsung watch and band). But it uses the laws of physics, it doesn't make up new ones.

For those who read The Drifters (my dad gave it to me in high school), remember that a really bad thing happened in Morocco.

 

Wilco1
User Rank
CEO
Re: There are many suckers out there..
Wilco1   5/11/2014 6:42:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Your links have been taken offline - proof of government and big-oil suppressing the truth!!!

And don't forget about all those cars that run only on water!!! :-)

If people fall for these kinds of scam, they'll fall for anything... But then again lots of people are indoctrinated from a young age to believe stuff that obviously isn't true.

Back to the free/zero-energy scam, here is another one from the scam artist Dennis Lee (http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Dennis_Lee) preying on the weak: http://www.kingdomgrant.org/woj/signup.html

That's just priceless...

 

David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
Re: There are many suckers out there..
David Ashton   5/11/2014 5:29:56 PM
NO RATINGS
@Selinz... "For far less than $200K, they could hire a consultant like Mr. Ashton to debunk this! ;-)"  I wish......

selinz
User Rank
CEO
Re: There are many suckers out there..
selinz   5/11/2014 12:10:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Aren't there laws against bad engineering analysis leading to poorly chosen investments of otherwise well intentioned charitors? For far less than $200K, they could hire a consultant like Mr. Ashton to debunk this! ;-)

Douglas442
User Rank
Rookie
Re: There are many suckers out there..
Douglas442   5/11/2014 7:57:56 AM
NO RATINGS
IRIS?... because of an operational similarity to the iris of a human eye?

Well.. I'll bet you can, at least, say it five times fast without verbally stalling or laughing out loud. Just try that with a Wankel Rotary Engine!

... anyway, you can't blame the guy for trying something different.

But, as for the QEG... oh, no no no no!

It's...... yet another bunch of "Nullpunkt" people ( a future variant of "Steampunk", perhaps? ) invoking Zero-Point-Energy. And all in the name of Nikola Tesla? Please, no!

All ZPE means is that nothing in the whole-wide Universe, not even a vacuum, can ever have absolutely ZERO energy... intuitively, this all sounds very sensible and desirable... and, that this fact is iron-clad guaranteed from those residual quivering droplets of energy, at the bottom of the potential well, that are being produced as a by-product of the Uncertainty Principle. 

( It's too bad that the money in our bank accounts doesn't work according to an equivalent principle. )

... however... what it doesn't mean is that there is, or ever will be, any practical way of getting a handle on all that energy, because it's everywhere.

And... at least we had all better hope that there are no DIY-accessible methods for producing Free-Unlimited-Energy!...... lest the outer crust of our planet should end up very soon joining the mantle and the core in assuming a nice-and-toasty glowing rosy-red color!  

Sorry, Nullpunkers... but no thank you anyway. Utilization of a conveniently situated black-hole remains as my favorite grandiose energy-extraction scheme.



David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
Re: There are many suckers out there..
David Ashton   5/10/2014 8:04:27 PM
NO RATINGS
@Bert "So, similar to your quantum generator. The obvious questions are never asked, and the hoax is allowed to perpetuate."

They take care not to get themselves in situations where the obvious questions can be asked, I think.   However I did find this posted in the metabunk forum:
Sorry, to burst all your hopes,
but I just heard yesterday regarding the QEG measurements in Morroco , that Gerhard Roessler, a German electrical engineer has just measured :

500 Watts input power from the drive motor and only 120 Watts maximal output power at the lamps...

so no overunity and no selfrunning...
 QEG??   No, QED!!!


Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
Re: There are many suckers out there..
Bert22306   5/10/2014 5:56:52 PM
NO RATINGS
There are many suckers, apparently. One example I'll not forget is a radio interview program I heard, maybe 4 years ago now, about this internal combustion engine called the "iris engine." You can find several articles online, but it's much the same thing as your quantum generator.

Don't you know, it's 70 percent efficient, as opposed to 25 to 30 percent efficient. Why haven't we seen it in vehicles? Because of the petroleum lobby. Why is it so efficient? Here, this is also what the interviewee described in the interview (the two paragraphs below in italics are a direct quote):

http://gigaom.com/2010/01/26/iris-engine-eyes-uber-efficient-gas-engine-tech/

The key element of the IRIS engine design (the brainchild of the IRIS executives' father, Timber Dick, who died in 2008) is a system of valves and vents that allows the combustion chamber to expand in diameter, rather than length. IRIS claims this expanding diameter means 70 percent of the surface area of the engine chamber can "react productively" to combustion, which is to say, by moving.

In a conventional engine, the company claims only about a quarter of the chamber's surface area is productive — the rest is passive.

So the guest on the show concluded that the iris engine would be 70 percent efficient. And horrors of horrors, the interviewer just drank the coolaid. Aaargh!

The obvious question SHOULD have been, "What is the maximum compression ratio you can achieve? Who says that 'working area' has anything to do with efficiency of a heat engine?" In fact, there is nothing in the Carnot cycle, in Boyle's law (P1V1=P2V2), in the gas equation (PV=nRT), all of which would be used to derive the max theoretical efficiency of a heat engine, that hints at "working area" playing a part.

On the other hand, compression ratio is the key. Given that pistons are great at compression, given that conventional ICEs already operate close to or at detonation, it seems unlikely that attempting to improve efficiency of an ICE by fussing with an irrelevant parameter. Not to mention, the iris design seems inherently less effective than pistons, at simple compression.

So, similar to your quantum generator. The obvious questions are never asked, and the hoax is allowed to perpetuate.

David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
Re: There are many suckers out there..
David Ashton   5/9/2014 8:45:30 PM
NO RATINGS
@Antedeluvian.... She must have done well since you looked, as it now says

$27,116 raised by 357 people in 17 months.

(Maybe, like me, you eyes are not as good as they used to be ? :-)

Add the $18,000 on Indiegogo and that's not a bad income.

Wonder how long they can keep this going?

 

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
Sadie!!
 
perl_geek
 
David Ashton
 
Max The Magnificent
 
mhrackin
 
Max The Magnificent
 
Max The Magnificent
 
Max The Magnificent
 
mhrackin
Most Recent Messages
9/22/2014
5:03:17 PM
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
How to Cope with a Burpy Comet
October 17, 2pm EDT Friday
EE Times Editorial Director Karen Field interviews Andrea Accomazzo, Flight Director for the Rosetta Spacecraft.