Breaking News
Blog

Artificial & Machine Intelligence: Future Fact, or Fantasy?

NO RATINGS
1 saves
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
sofianitz
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: Artificial & Machine Intelligence
sofianitz   5/21/2014 4:00:25 AM
NO RATINGS
I respect Joseph Conrad's right to speak metaphorically, and that's another thing computers can't do.

sofianitz
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: Machines don't Evolve
sofianitz   5/21/2014 3:32:56 AM
NO RATINGS
For sure, the "mechanics" (what a loaded word) of genetic reproduction are not understood, hardly at all.  Consider the remarkable complexity of the fruit fly transcriptome.  People at UC Berkeley found about 100 genes that can encode hundreds or even thousands of different types of proteins, which they do selectively, in a completely unknown way, in response to environmental stress tests they performed on them.  And that's only a fruit fly.

http://newscenter.lbl.gov/news-releases/2014/03/16/gene-expression-map/

Denis.Giri
User Rank
Manager
Re: Machines don't Evolve
Denis.Giri   5/21/2014 3:02:23 AM
NO RATINGS
weird that you've never heard of genetic algorithms...

sofianitz
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: Artificial & Machine Intelligence
sofianitz   5/20/2014 4:54:56 PM
NO RATINGS
i now close my comments on this question.  I hope they have opened some thoughts of those working on the problem of 'Machine intelligence".  Truly, one of humanity's "hard" problems and I honor all of you working on it.

Sofianitz

 

sofianitz
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: Artificial & Machine Intelligence
sofianitz   5/20/2014 3:06:02 PM
NO RATINGS
That is false.  Everybody has the same undestanding of thinking.  That is, I believe that there are other beings like me out there. This is the first principle of faith, that makes human communication posssibe. But if you don't understand the difference between "thinking" and "what thinking means"?  Gosh, try to crawl out of the mud.

sofianitz
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: Artificial & Machine Intelligence
sofianitz   5/20/2014 2:39:14 PM
 

Airplanes cannot fly.  Sure as hell.  Birds can, though. since the Mesozoic era, 

Get into an airplane and yell, fly! fly!

sofianitz
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: Artificial & Machine Intelligence
sofianitz   5/20/2014 2:35:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Oh God, that's rediculous.  We communicate with programs written by humans (computers can't communicate, what an absurd idea). We communicate with algorithims that supply us with character strings that we can recognize, often provided reasonably directly to us by other humans, but ultimately always provided by humans, even if indirectly.  Truly, who else can possily provide us with these symbols from which we generate meaning?  And, if they  were not intentional human communications, how would we possibly recognize them?

Are you awake?

!@@@@@@@$$$$$%%%%%%^^^^&&&&&&****((((((((()))))))_____

sofianitz
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: Artificial & Machine Intelligence
sofianitz   5/20/2014 2:10:59 PM
NO RATINGS
I like the Turing Test, too. Alan Turing, hell of a smart guy.  One of the greatest minds, on the level of Frank Ramsey. But, Turing was wrong, and Ramsey was right.

Following Ramsey the statement "Saint Paul's Cathedral has a semantic content."

Is the same as saying "Saint Paul's Cathedral."

betajet
User Rank
CEO
Re: Artificial & Machine Intelligence
betajet   5/20/2014 1:35:08 PM
NO RATINGS
I understand Dijkstra's comment to mean that it's pointless to argue about whether computers can think because everybody has a different understanding of what thinking means.  If one argues that a submarine cannot swim, then one would have to argue that an airplane cannot fly.  Birds fly, and so do airplanes.  Fish swim, but for some reason submarines don't?  It's just a question of what semantics you want to assign to the words, and is about as useful as wondering why the plural of mouse is mice, yet the plural of house is houses.

Personally, I like the Turing test.  Every day people communicate with other entities on the Internet, and have no way of knowing whether the entity on the other end is another human, an intelligent computer, someone from another planet, or a dog :-)

Update: Besides, one can speak of a vessel as swimming, as in my father's favorite line from Joseph Conrad's Narcissus, which refers to a disabled ship at sea: "As long as she swims I will cook!"

sofianitz
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: Machines don't Evolve
sofianitz   5/20/2014 12:30:15 PM
Preposteous.  The thought the "evolution can be programmed into a computer" is so absurd, that I immediately don't know how to react to it.  I've programmed a lot of computers, but the thought of  including evolution into computers, which is an extremely valuable human abstract concept, provided by Darwin and Huxley in the 19th century, is beyond my imagination. How would you do that?  Certainly you could not input a bunch of character strings, or operations on and manipulation of same.  That would be, on it's face, absurd.

Are you in charge of the Universe, or what?  Truly, how would you do that?

Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week