Breaking News
Blog

Google’s New Car to Change Self-Driving Debate

From a personal luxury to a tool serving the social good
NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 6   >   >>
krisi
User Rank
CEO
re-framing
krisi   5/28/2014 10:25:58 AM
I like re-framing the concept from something extraordinary with lots of technology and costing hundreds of thousands to car for all...I easily see nobody owning a car in 50 years (like nobody owns a train, a plane or a bus with few very minor exceptions)...but how do we get there is not clear to me...for 50 years there will be a mix of people and computers driving the cars...Kris

HankWalker
User Rank
Manager
Evolution More Likely
HankWalker   5/28/2014 11:34:24 AM
NO RATINGS
As the article implies, the straightforward way to get buyers to trust a self-driving car is to have it evolve gradually to ADAS to "super cruise control" to autonomy.

RichQ
User Rank
CEO
Right direction
RichQ   5/28/2014 12:44:44 PM
NO RATINGS
This seems like a step in the right direction. Rather than gradually wean folks off of driving, offer them a viable replacement. Something like this could start operating in restricted areas of cities or communities, for instance, as an alternative form of public transportation (the taxi driverw would hate it). Then, as people got used to being driven about by a machine, the self-directed vehicles could be phased out by raising the driver skill level requirements so that not just everyone could get a driver's license.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: re-framing
junko.yoshida   5/28/2014 12:45:26 PM
@kris, I am glad you like this reframing of the concept. I have always suspected this but I think Google's latest video clip makes it clear...this ain't a car as we know it for our own driving, but it is simply a "ride" -- another transportation mechanism.

Rather than envisioning the day when nobody owns the car, I'd like to see it yet another transportation mechanism we can use when we feel like it...

tpfj
User Rank
CEO
Automotive industry's answer
tpfj   5/28/2014 1:19:36 PM
NO RATINGS
I wonder what is currently being discussed or soon to be discussed in the boardrooms of Tesla, Nissan, Crysler, GM, Ford et al? Google, with this and also their Maps and their Streetview have a huge headstart on any answer they may respond with.

 

Feels to me like a compelling medium-term threat to their skin in the game.

Sanjib.A
User Rank
CEO
Sweet surprise from Google!
Sanjib.A   5/28/2014 1:31:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Lovely!! Google has demonstrated again that the team Google has the capability of innovating the right product. This is what is expected out of the self driving car....passengers would just have to seat and enjoy...rest will be taken care by car's automated driving system. Next step would be to demonstrate the same car moving on a busy road...and hope to see that soon!

krisi
User Rank
CEO
Re: Right direction
krisi   5/28/2014 1:32:17 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree Rich, that sounds liek a sensible thing to do...I would welcome rising levels of driving skills required right now, half of the people where I live (Vancouver) don't know how to drive...and don't get me started on texting while driving, that already kills more people than alkochol

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Right direction
Duane Benson   5/28/2014 1:45:03 PM
NO RATINGS
"Something like this could start operating in restricted areas of cities or communities"

I think this hits the nail on the head. One of the fears I head about self driving cars relates to all of the variabilities that exist when driving. Remove a lot of the variables and a lot of those concerns become mitigated.

DCH0
User Rank
Rookie
The market is already ere
DCH0   5/28/2014 2:19:37 PM
NO RATINGS
For those of us who have had to struggle to get family members in their 80's to quit driving, this is what we needed. They just want to get to the local market and doctor's appointments on their own.

DesertData
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: re-framing Re-Designing
DesertData   5/28/2014 2:50:49 PM
I have seen this LASER device on top of the vehicle, and think that it falls far short of what it is wanting or supposed to do. 

Instead of the "Bubble-Gum" machine on top, they should have pulse coded LASERs surounding the car horizontally, and then some on top to check for low clearances.  Then use the available Radar sensors (Front & Back) to judge distance between other vehicles, and GPS for positionning the vehicle. 

Why did they settle for such a silly device as they did, when better technology is already in use on standard cars today? 

I don't argue that having a self automation vehicle is a good thing to have, and there are some foundations that might be in a possition to institute them into a transit program in some cities. 

But, Google needs to find some new blood for their mix of "Techies" to start thinking further than where they are right now.  I think their technology for this auto is in a stale-mate, and won't go into production untill they get rid of the LASER scanner on the roof.  Somebody there must have a personal interest or agenda for keeping that rediculus thing.

Just some of my musings over it.  I would like to see them in production, but make it realistically functional, and safe for the passengers.

 

 

Page 1 / 6   >   >>
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.