Breaking News
Blog

Are You a Gweep?

Blog
7/2/2014 08:00 AM EDT

 42 comments   post a comment
NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 5   >   >>
betajet
User Rank
Author
VT100? You're just a pup.
betajet   7/2/2014 2:37:49 PM
Pfui.  The only way to get started is punched cards, paper tape, and toggling in the RIM loader through the PDP-8 switch register.  Them newfanged "glass teletypes" will only lead to trouble.  You kids get off my lawn!  :-)

I've never heard of gweeps.  It must be a WPI thing, since gweep is almost an anagram of WPI.  When I was an undergrad, programmers had Rasputin-like long scraggly beards, carried around boxes of cards, consulted documentation in huge binders filled with cabalistic incantations, and were generally regarded as all-powerful druids.

All that ended when you could buy floppy disks at K-mart.

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Re: VT100? You're just a pup.
MeasurementBlues   7/2/2014 2:48:55 PM
NO RATINGS
@betajet

Click on "Gweeps" at the top of the article for a link. Yes, it's a WPI thing. Supposedly the name came from terminals pre-VT100 that would beep whenver you touched a key. That was before my time.

 

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Re: VT100? You're just a pup.
MeasurementBlues   7/2/2014 2:49:43 PM
NO RATINGS
A few years after graduating, I returned to my fraternity house and  was appalled. There was a TV-100 in  the  second floor landing, connected over an acoustic dialup modem to  the school VAX computer. A great convenience, but it  meant the gweeps had taken over sacred space.

RGARVIN640
User Rank
Author
Re: VT100? You're just a pup.
RGARVIN640   7/2/2014 3:01:29 PM
NO RATINGS
You are not old school unless you used punch cards to enter your programs. My first embedded programming was with an Altair 8800(?) toggleing switches. Then got to work with a 6803 system writing assembly language and storing them on the 8 inch floppy!! First system design was a 6502 based cpu, so wrote assembly code on an Apple II computer.

betajet
User Rank
Author
Re: VT100? You're just a pup.
betajet   7/2/2014 3:04:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Guinea pigs also go gweep, gweep, gweeeep.  Either that or jeep, jeep, jeeeeeep.

 

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Re: VT100? You're just a pup.
MeasurementBlues   7/2/2014 3:12:31 PM
NO RATINGS
I did use punch cards my freshman year and I don't miss them. I don't miss floppy disks, either.

RGARVIN640
User Rank
Author
Re: VT100? You're just a pup.
RGARVIN640   7/2/2014 3:24:08 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't miss them either, as I paid $350 for my first floppy drive. An Apple II with  147K storage capacity! Woz was the man. New EE's now do not have a clue on how much easier things are now, compared to back then.

betajet
User Rank
Author
Re: VT100? You're just a pup.
betajet   7/2/2014 3:24:32 PM
NO RATINGS
The great thing about punch cards is that you can fold them into missiles and launch them using a rubber band.  They're really dangerous: the point is sharp and they'll go quite a ways into acoustic tile ceilings.

Try doing that with a flash drive :-)

MeasurementBlues
User Rank
Author
Re: VT100? You're just a pup.
MeasurementBlues   7/2/2014 3:37:17 PM
NO RATINGS
New EE's now do not have a clue on how much easier things are now, compared to back then.

And yet, we work more today than back then. What went wrong?

betajet
User Rank
Author
Re: VT100? You're just a pup.
betajet   7/2/2014 4:02:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Martin wrote: And yet, we work more today than back then. What went wrong?

While some things are indeed a lot easier now -- my favorite example is being able to capture transient events using a digital 'scope -- many things are much harder.  In particular, it's much harder for a CPU to talk to I/O devices.  My favorite example of this is that the PDP-11 Peripherals Handbook has a chapter called "Programming" which covers how to write I/O programs in PDP-11 assembly language using both busy-waiting and interrupts.  The chapter is eight pages long.

Nowadays device-level programmers have to deal with Windows or Linux device drivers, which require understanding thousands of pages of arbitrary complexity, and modern SoCs require hundreds or thousands of lines of initialization code just to get started.

Another example is USB.  If you're using a properly-designed USB device, it's really easy: you just plug it in and it installed as if by magic.  If you're writing the software to implement that magic, it's a nightmare.

Page 1 / 5   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed