Breaking News
Blog

Betting Big on HD-to-Ultra HDTV Transition

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Anand.Yaligar
User Rank
Author
Re: UltraHD content ?
Anand.Yaligar   8/17/2014 8:55:54 AM
NO RATINGS
@Loek: i couldn't agree more. With companies churning out UHD TVs, the source of UHD is still not determined, since most broadcast companies do not have UHD capable recording devices. One thing more, UHD TV's have to come with great surround sound, because buying a costly UHD TV only to buy another stereo system for 3D surround sound is deal breaking.

jmcleod951
User Rank
Author
Ultra HD content
jmcleod951   8/15/2014 3:28:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Television set manufacturers are faced with the reality that HDTV sales has peaked and is no longer growing. They've seen in Ultra HD a means of getting consumers to begin a new buying cycle replacing HD with Ultra HD. To convince consumers to make this transition has required set makers to get content owners to make Ultra HD content available. This is borne out by recent reports from market research firms. In a recent comment in UHD/4K Reporter: Issue 091 "Weekly Reports from the UHD front" (http://riderresearch.com/current-reports/):

"UHD set makers are vigorously looking for more quality UHD content. ABI Research's practice director Sam Rosen said Samsung and Sony are doing everything in their power to seed the market with 4K content and services in order to convince consumers to purchase higher priced and higher margin 4K TV sets. Sony, with its motion picture division, is in a good position and has released a significant amount of remastered content on a download-based movie player. Meanwhile, Samsung, in a similar fashion, offered early adopters a free USB HDD with two full-length 4K videos and additional 4K clips, he said."


This relationship between content suppliers and television set makers is symbiotic in that content suppliers can offer their content (video of demand with a fee) directly to the consumer via an App on the Smart TV. The set maker makes out because he gets a portion of the revenue the consumer pays the content supplier. In this sense, the television set maker could make more from revenue sharing than from selling the tv. Expect to see more of this happening as Ultra HD TV sets begin shipping in September ahead of the Chrismas buying season.

jeffa4444
User Rank
Author
Content is King
jeffa4444   8/15/2014 6:23:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Whilst many shows shoot 4K the majority post in 2K and the majority of HD content broadcast is less than 2K. Nearly all repeats are SD from past catalogues and modern TVs dont actually display this material very well as their resolution is biased towards HD or in the case of Ultra HD 4K.

Utopia exists in the minds of TV set manufacturers but in reality Ultra HD in practical  terms is some way off. As to NHK and Super HD (8K) we cannot handle multi-channel 2K very well so 8K has no chance. 

Loek.Frederiks_#2
User Rank
Author
UltraHD content ?
Loek.Frederiks_#2   8/15/2014 4:53:25 AM
NO RATINGS
Here in the Netherlands broadcasters are still writing off their investiments in SD studio and camera equipment, even worse Dutch national TV has only one HD-capable studio and can only service one HD broadcast at a time.

Movies, sports are in HD, but taped broadcasts and most live stuff is still in glorious SD. This is a big difference with the US. Appearently production companies still charge a premium for a HD production. Personally, make no sense to me.. given the fact that the consumer market has completely switched to HD.

I wish manufacturers good luck with UHD sets. Likely, production costs for UHD sets will drop down so fast that it doesn't make sense to manufacture HD sets anymore. However, I'm afraid we will be watching upscaled HD content or possibly even SD stuff for quite some time to come....

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed