Breaking News
What Do You Do With Hundreds of Pix You Take?
7/12/2013

Of course, everyone who is married has a wedding album, but whatever happens to the pictures we take the rest of our lives?
Of course, everyone who is married has a wedding album, but whatever happens to the pictures we take the rest of our lives?

Return to Article

View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 4   >   >>
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: simplest solution
junko.yoshida   7/15/2013 9:36:06 AM
NO RATINGS
It appears wherever it i(Flickr, or any place else) may be, saving your pix in the cloud seems to be the solution... 

But again, how long Flickr, for example, is going to keep your pix, I wonder.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Archiving for 100 Years or More.
junko.yoshida   7/15/2013 9:30:07 AM
NO RATINGS
LOL. Of course, that's true as long as the papers tone deteriorate...

BobsView
User Rank
CEO
Archiving for 100 Years or More.
BobsView   7/15/2013 8:54:48 AM
NO RATINGS
The Russians have recently developed a very advanced method of archiving important documents that has a high degree of security and is expected to last at least 100 years.  In fact, they believe it is virtually impossible to hack.

It is called white paper and typewriter.  

 

 

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
Re: simplest solution
Sheetal.Pandey   7/15/2013 2:27:58 AM
NO RATINGS
We took so many photos that the camera's memory was crowded, had to copy the data in external harddisk. But when I travelled across countries, something happened to the hard disk and no photos are accessible. Luckily had uploaded few to facebook. Was using flickr and picasa earlier but I guess sharing photos on so many sites is quite difficult. Facebook is going well as all friends and family are there.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
simplest solution
eewiz   7/15/2013 12:53:20 AM
The simplest solution to tackle this photo mess, is to open a Free 1 TB flickr account. Upload all the photos based on date/time/month tag.

Wait for someone to implment a face recognition function in flickr ( iPhoto already have this). Then once you tag one person, you can find all the other photos of the same person ( as decided by the algorithm) automatically

seaEE
User Rank
CEO
Fuji may be on to something.
seaEE   7/13/2013 3:34:54 PM
NO RATINGS
I know one person who use to print quite a few pictures but now has a digital camera, takes pictures, but does nothing with them.  I enjoyed seeing the printed pictures.  Now I don't get to see anything!  Fuji may be on to something.  I use to enjoy getting the prints back and then even going the futher step of making enlargements of those frames  I really liked.  Was there delay in the process?  Yes, but anticipation can be half the fun.

DMcCunney
User Rank
CEO
Re:
DMcCunney   7/13/2013 11:57:26 AM
NO RATINGS
An old friend of mine made ther transition from film to digital.  When he shot film, he was painfully aware of constraints.  Film cost. Processing cost.  And he had only so many shots per reel, so he spent time up front framing and composing shots before he clicked the shutter to make every shot count.

With digital, he didn't care about film or processing, and he could shoot and shoot and shoot.  But while he didn't have up front costs, he had back end costs in terms of time.  He had to dump all of those images from his camera to a PC, review them decide which were keepers, and load some of the ones he did keep into an image editor to crop and color correct,  I told him to remember the skills he applied shooting film, and take the time before clicking the shutter to get it right, to reduce the post-processing time required.

DMcCunney
User Rank
CEO
Re: About 2,000 Digital Photos a Year.
DMcCunney   7/13/2013 11:50:22 AM
NO RATINGS
A friend of mine is a former graphic designer and art director who now makes his living doing photo restoration.  People bring him old battered print, and he scans them, imports to Photoshop, and does restorations.  He reports people crying in joy when they see the results, as that old battered print might be the only image they had of a beloved late relative.  I've seen a few of the before and afters, and deeply admired his skill, as he often didn't have a lot to work with, 

krisi
User Rank
CEO
Re: who owns the pics?
krisi   7/13/2013 11:05:07 AM
NO RATINGS
thank you Junko...I was afraid that was the answer...that means that Facebook can take my pictures  and sell them to you (not that you would want to buy them, they are not that interesting ;-)...interesting arrangement!

prabhakar_deosthali
User Rank
CEO
Re:
prabhakar_deosthali   7/13/2013 2:04:41 AM
NO RATINGS
People were more careful while taking pictures with the old technology analog cameras - because you could not review your picture till you got it in print and the print was costly and would be only taken when the complete role was developed.

The pictures taken with those technologies are still preserved in those precious albums and serve as reminders of sweet memories of the past.

 

With new digital techniques and high resolution automatic cameras built into the mobile phones, picture taking is no more a skill or art or something precious. Hundreds of pictures are clicked everyday by everyday and many of them are just forgotten after clicking . With cheap storage available nobody bothers much to classify, arrange, remove unwanted pictures. So all these pictures are just lying idle in some remote servers occupying huge storage space for years.

 

Companies like Facebook need to have policies to force housekeeping of such storage by the users otherwise the whole thing will become unmanageable someday.

 

<<   <   Page 2 / 4   >   >>
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed