Breaking News
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-engineering
mcgrathdylan   7/24/2013 7:47:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Any idea how popular this has been so far? How many basic kits people have already bought from him? It seems like Ryan has gone to quite a bit of work to advance his hobby. Seems like a labor of love.

Tom Murphy
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-engineering
Tom Murphy   7/24/2013 1:03:58 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a great prototype for a stablization system for animation! I'm sure it could be productized and made into a profitable enterprise, perhaps using materials (metal or plastic) that would be a bit less clunky.  There are a lot of options to stabilize video and most cameras have some basic stablization built in; there are also good harnesses that strap onto the camera person, but I hadn't seen a system like this for animation before.  Surely, Lucas Arts has something like this in its shop. 

 

kfield
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-engineering
kfield   7/24/2013 11:54:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the insights Cab. I guess what I was really thinking about was now that he is going into version 2, there's likely to be feature additions and optimization of the existing design. It's always interesting to me to look at a design unfold over several iterations and get an understanding of the engineer's thought process throughout.

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-engineering
Caleb Kraft   7/24/2013 11:43:56 AM
NO RATINGS
That $400 is the rough cost of the wood, motors, and control board. The software is free, and he's giving away his files for free right now.

You could estimate the additional cost for new features. Lets say you knew you wanted an arm with 2 axis control and a pan/tilt head on the end of it. You know you'll need 4 stepper motors and a wood frame. It isn't like a commercial system where you would also have an additional software module that would cost a small fortune. 

While this is awesome, it isn't a business model. He's not making kits as a job. I think he's just offering to help people continue his hobby. if 5,000 people wanted them from him, he'd have to rethink some things in order to be able to support them all. 

kfield
User Rank
Blogger
Re-engineering
kfield   7/24/2013 11:39:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Very cool project. I'd love to see you publish details on his next generation device and some of hte trade-offs and decisions he's making, particularly if he plans to keep the price point at around $400.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.