Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Blog

Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 4   >   >>
Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
Peter Clarke   6/21/2012 1:29:28 PM
NO RATINGS
@SimonV Thanks for pointing out that the "European Paradox" was first formalized more than a decade ago although i was certainly aware of it on a national UK basis in the 1980s.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
krisi   6/21/2012 2:12:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting issue on its own...but I feel this has to do more with a complex system design rather than Airbus...Kris

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
krisi   6/21/2012 2:13:19 PM
NO RATINGS
The same here, I had a similar feeling about European R&D for years but was never aware of the "European paradox" concept...Kris

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
KB3001   6/21/2012 7:21:59 PM
NO RATINGS
- Risk-averse culture (because of big government?) - Weak funding mechanisms (much smaller Seed/Bridge/Business Angel/VC pool of money compared to the US) - Fragmented European markets e.g. when a bright kid in the US thinks of a social networking business, he/she has a 300-million market to start with, a European kid starts with 80 millions at best)

Lampshuk
User Rank
Rookie
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
Lampshuk   6/22/2012 6:38:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Does anybody else remember European Silicon Structures? Any lessons to be learned from that experience? I think it can hardly be claimed as a success, but maybe that was a case of too many innovations at once rather than too many Euro-cooks spoiling the broth. I fear that the big, lumbering bureaucracy of Airbus, riddled with political compromise, fits in perfectly with the aerospace industry but would not last long in semiconductors

rajenr
User Rank
Rookie
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
rajenr   6/25/2012 6:43:42 PM
NO RATINGS
I often wonder why European Engineers do not want to come to the US for the many job opportunities in this country. There are lots of jobs for qualified engineers here. I have the sense that they prefer to remain within Europe and want the jobs to be created in the continent. Is there any over-riding reason. The jobs pay much better in the USA and the work is largely the same or better.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
Bert22306   6/25/2012 7:56:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Why European engineers want to stay in Europe? Because, ever since the 1960s or 1970s, the standard of living in Europe has rivaled that of the US. Life is a balance of work and other activities, and what Europe offers is not easy to give up. Yes, the pay might still be better in the US, and the professional aspects of the job are too, in my opinion. But that's not all there is to life, either. Of course, as the news programs make painfully clear these days, that equation might be changing. Globalization is here to stay, and the Euro-socialist policies are catching up with them. We can only hope the US doesn't continue to head down that path too.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
Peter Clarke   11/21/2012 12:18:33 PM
NO RATINGS
I remember ES2 as I expect does Sir Robin Saxby

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
Peter Clarke   11/21/2012 12:19:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Many European engineers do migrate to the United States but I think the opportunities are far less than they were during the famous brain-drain time of the 1960s. This is partly because those U.S. companies have themselves become globalized.

MClayton0
User Rank
CEO
re: Europe asks if it is time for an Airbus of chips
MClayton0   11/25/2012 5:05:34 AM
NO RATINGS
ST, Infineon, et al certainly got lots of taxpayer help in Europe and yet are "too small in themselves" in spite of all that help. Merging them and giving wider European support may be only thing that will keep them alive. But nanoelectronics will not come out of the legacy microelectronics companies, in my opinion, just a diode makers failed to become transistor makers who then failed to become IC makers. I vote to the IMEC R/D approach.

<<   <   Page 3 / 4   >   >>
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll