Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Blog

We should pay for patents by the pound

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
przemek0
User Rank
Rookie
re: We should pay for patents by the pound
przemek0   12/7/2012 10:01:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Nope, the US Constitution only talks about promoting "the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries". In other words, it protects the Progress of Science and Arts, not the inventors! The copyright and patent protections are just a way of ensuring such Progress. The important corollary is that if the system is failing to do that, the Constitution requires that it be changed.

me3
User Rank
Rookie
re: We should pay for patents by the pound
me3   12/7/2012 10:17:19 PM
NO RATINGS
This is the most Communistic reading of the US Constitution I have ever seen. Yeah, put 'em in doungons and let 'em invent for the Progress. It had been tried before somewhere, Comrade, it did not work out.

Paul Glaubitz
User Rank
Manager
re: We should pay for patents by the pound
Paul Glaubitz   12/10/2012 7:34:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Were this put into effect I'd predict many patents for high density ink (probably lead, murcury bases...)

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week