Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Blog

CES: Three reasons why Ultra HDTV is a non-starter

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
re: CES: Three reasons why Ultra HDTV is a non-starter
junko.yoshida   1/8/2013 7:08:49 PM
NO RATINGS
That's when a new codec standard will come into rescue!

Cookie Jar
User Rank
Rookie
re: CES: Three reasons why Ultra HDTV is a non-starter
Cookie Jar   1/8/2013 9:02:01 PM
NO RATINGS
More and more movies are being shot in 4K and more and more theaters have 4K projection equipment. So the content, at least as far as movies are concerned, is in the can already. 4K captured many events at the London Olympics. So the equipment and technology exists. Even for amateur videographers, most DSLR image capturing hardware is quite capable of 4K video. It's just a matter of updating the processors in them. As we all know the price of processors keeps falling. You gotta have something to do with all that computing power besides write terribly inefficient code. Apple's iPad certainly showed the feasibility of resolution greater than HD in a mass product. A lot of people jumped on that bandwagon. The industry needs an entrepreneur like Steve Jobs to make the public gotta have one.

Scott SG.
User Rank
Freelancer
re: CES: Three reasons why Ultra HDTV is a non-starter
Scott SG.   1/8/2013 10:02:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Are there statistics showing HDTV owners watch mostly SDTV? That certainly isn't the case in my household. In fact, out of the 2 dozen or so shows scheduled on my DVR I can only think of one that is in standard definition, and that's because there is no HD equivilent.

Sparky_Watt
User Rank
Rookie
re: CES: Three reasons why Ultra HDTV is a non-starter
Sparky_Watt   1/8/2013 11:35:31 PM
NO RATINGS
I would point out that in many places, including my town, cable is the only decent way to get video content and HD costs lots extra. You can get 100 channels of SDTV, or you can triple the cost by adding a few channels of HD. I believe that most people still watch SDTV. It isn't because they can't tell the difference, it is because the difference isn't worth the cost.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: CES: Three reasons why Ultra HDTV is a non-starter
Bert22306   1/9/2013 12:04:05 AM
NO RATINGS
You could bypass the cable system and get over the air broadcasts. Just about every multiplex has their main channel in HD. If you have Verizon FiOS as an option, I believe they offer HD at no extra cost. I use over the air and Internet TV exclusively. So HD is a staple diet for me, for any over the air broadcasts. No cost, other than buying the TV set, of course. ATSC did it right in this respect. Receiving the HD stream was a mandate for all receivers, whether or not they were capable of actually displaying HD. This avoids having to waste bandwidth transmitting two copies of the same program. IMO, to introduce UHDTV, a good approach would be to replace HD with UHD streams, taking up the same b/s as the HD stream (via H.265 compression). And then make that stream also available as SD-only, for some relatively short transitional period. At the end of the transitional period, those who do not have a UHD-capable set would be able to buy a STB to convert UHD streams to HD or SD. This would then free up spectrum again, for more programs. The end result would be the same number of channels available then as now.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: CES: Three reasons why Ultra HDTV is a non-starter
Robotics Developer   3/30/2013 3:37:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Cookie Jar, I love the "You gotta have something to do with all that computing power besides write terribly inefficient code." comment! I found myself agreeing with most of the comments about price vs acceptance. I would love higher resolution and higher bandwidth (from my cable) but currently cost is my limiting factor. Once the cost comes down then people will begin to move towards it. I still remember the first few days after switching from the old modem to cable modems; it seemed that the internet pages just blasted their way onto the monitor! Now I find myself fustrated with "how slow" the internet connection is, funny how quickly we adjust our metrics!

brook.d
User Rank
Rookie
Since technology has evolved rapidly
brook.d   7/29/2014 8:20:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Since technology has evolved rapidly in the past years, the demand for high resolution home theater systems has followed the same trend. People who prefere such a flat screen, should also check out the offers on http://www.standsandmounts.com/plasmaandlcdmounts.aspx for a complete home theater experience.

<<   <   Page 3 / 3
More Blogs
2015 will likely be the year of widespread awareness and adoption of giga-scale SPICE. Willy Wonka may agree: "So much time and so little to do. Wait a minute. Strike that. Reverse it."
In January 2015, Lindsay Craig will be teaching technology workshops with his East African partners to farmers, educators, engineers, artists, students, and dreamers.
Help turn the first house to have a telephone into a museum.
The open ESIstream protocol has less encoding overhead and higher data bandwidth than JESD204B. It's also significantly easier to implement ESIstream digital core.
At IEDM 2014, IBM claims that for PCM, non-volatility/data-retention is no longer essential. Ron Neale takes a close look.
Most Recent Comments
BinaryJudy
 
BinaryJudy
 
BinaryJudy
 
TonyTib
 
BinaryJudy
 
ROOMTEMPSC
 
jnissen
 
perl_geek
 
Max The Magnificent
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week