Breaking News
Blog

Why it’s wrong for Intel, AMD to abandon WSTS

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Mark1980
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why it’s wrong for Intel, AMD to abandon WSTS
Mark1980   3/3/2012 7:33:11 AM
NO RATINGS
I think AMD pulled out first to confuse intel of the direction AMD is heading or wants to go (Rory Read is a smart guy). clearly AMD is at an disadvantage against big Intel and its underhand tactics.. By Doing this, AMD has become a moving target for intel and its monopoly/money/customer links advantage. little stuff like this matter allot when you are up against intel (intel has been known/caught to play shady).

abraxalito
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why it’s wrong for Intel, AMD to abandon WSTS
abraxalito   3/14/2012 9:38:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Why - you want some too?

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Navigate to Related Links
Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll