Breaking News
Blog

Is Moore's Law Dead? Does It Matter?

NO RATINGS
1 saves
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 6 / 6
seaEE
User Rank
CEO
Reformulate it
seaEE   8/2/2013 1:02:02 AM
NO RATINGS
It may be that Moore's law needs to be reformulated, not in terms of transistors, microns, and nanometers, but purely in terms of the transfer of information.

I think that given advances in physics, materials, and new computing methods, Moore's Law, whatever it really is, will continue in some way shape or form.

 

 

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
Re: Innovation will continue
KB3001   8/2/2013 9:46:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Could not agree more. I say bring it on! Our over-reliance on transistor level improvements over 30 years or so made us LAZY, but what's 30 years in the history of human progress? nothing. We ought to look at other levels including:

- Algorithmic: for many decades now, our way of thinking about problem solving has been biased towards Von-Neuman implementation platforms with semiconductor chups. Let's look beyond that and devise new algorithms for wider platforms and paradigms.

- Architectural: Hardware is not just about transistors, it's about computing and communication designs and architectures. I do not think we have explored the realm of possibilities here adequately, there is still a lot to be done.

-Physical: Binary electronics using semiconductors is one of many possibilities for computing, storage and communication. Here again, we have scratched the surface.

To solve our computing, storage and communications needs, we must train a new breed of scientists and engineers. Out with the modularization, fragmentation and specialization of training and teaching, and in with holistic education.

 

Back to basics!

 

 

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
Equilibrium
KB3001   8/2/2013 9:50:50 AM
"So, what happens if the whole world has equal access to technology? Does stability depend on one country having a bigger stick than everyone else?"

 

The truth is precisely the opposite, peace takes place when there is an equilibrium of power, and that happens when there is equal access to technology, not when one country has a bigger stick than everyone else.

 

The American expert is right in seeking US advantage in high technology, but that is not necessarily in the interest of world peace :-) Others have to seek the same advantage and at some stage, they will realize that their interests lie in collaborating and cooperating rather than constantly seeking an advantage over the others. It's a process and we are nowhere near maturity....

jaybus0
User Rank
CEO
Re: Moore's "Law" is NOT the FIRST Paradigm to provide exponential growth of computing
jaybus0   8/2/2013 10:03:38 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree with your assessment of a quantum computer. However, technology being designed to implement a quantum computer could easily transfer to classical computers. Particularly, the silicon photonics that Intel, BM, and several others are working on could facilitate a paradigm shift such as suggested by Kurzweil.

What if an optical chip-to-chip data bus was as fast as the on-chip data bus? Just as we today connect a component implemented in one area of the die to another component in another area of the die, a chip-speed optical bus would allow inter-die components. This would be a paradigm shift. Instead of distributed computing using clusters of individual and independent computers, we could treat individual dies as a single virtual die, or in other words a very large SoC. In addition, this virtual SoC would be scalable to fit in whatever power envelope was available. There are many possibilities, but this one seems quite feasible in the near future.

 

Tom Murphy
User Rank
Blogger
Re: I propose the opposite is true
Tom Murphy   8/2/2013 11:25:02 AM
NO RATINGS
Bert: well, I respectfully disagree with your conclusion.  Moore's law leads to faster chips, but the military tends to use the most advanced chips -- which are more expensive even under Moore's Law.  That favors the richer country, which economists say will be China in the not-too-distant future.  If Moore's law ends, and chips stop get faster at that rate, that advantage is narrowed or -- in the extreme -- even eliminated.

Of course, the wealthier country could still benefit from other advanced technologies that would speed up processing outside the chip.  And all major countries already have enough firepower to blow up the planet several times over, so this is probably academic.

On the civil liberties front, the demise of Moore's Law could limit the mass processing of big-data to the point where there is no instant analysis of individuals based on "total information awareness" programs. That would cut into the expansion of intelligence programs like the NSA's.

 

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: Is Moore's Law Dead? Does It Matter?
resistion   8/3/2013 9:03:24 AM
NO RATINGS
For the others to catch up to US in technology, the US would have to be essentially static for an extended period of time. You can be assured that is probably not the case. In fact, it is probably more likely the others will try to stay a few steps back from the US leading edge which they fear is fraught with unknown risks they cannot learn fast enough about.

I'd be more worried about something all of mankind gets stuck on, due to fundamental physics, like related to quantum or entropy.

 

garydpdx
User Rank
CEO
Re: Innovation will continue
garydpdx   8/4/2013 12:06:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Performance progress has traditionally been lead by advances in semiconductor process but if we are approaching a plateau (and I'm optimistic that progress will be challenging both scientifically and financially, not things grinding to a halt), then we still have algorithm and architecture in which to innovate.  The challenges to advancing in semiconductor process also challenges incumbent RTL-based design since larger system level design perspectives will be required.  Yes, that horse has been beaten for a long while but there is growth (starting from an admittedly small base) as more and more people "get it" and turn to ESL.

<<   <   Page 6 / 6
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
How to Cope with a Burpy Comet
October 17, 2pm EDT Friday
EE Times Editorial Director Karen Field interviews Andrea Accomazzo, Flight Director for the Rosetta Spacecraft.