Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Blog

Splitting Sony Won't Restore Its Future

NO RATINGS
1 saves
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 5   >   >>
_hm
User Rank
CEO
Should Sony wait for one or two more years
_hm   8/2/2013 6:36:44 PM
NO RATINGS
My suggestion for Sony is to wait for one or two moe years. Sony have improved so much in last two years. Little more effort and they can rebounce back to past power and glory.

 

DMcCunney
User Rank
CEO
Re: What new platform?
DMcCunney   8/2/2013 6:57:56 PM
NO RATINGS
I am just thinking out loud here, so I apologize in advance for my half-baked idea here. But you wouldn't call that box a TV biz, would you?

I might.  The problem is one of definition.

There is television content, and there are the devices we use to display that content.  "TV" might mean either, depending upon context.  (And the devices will include both the actual display and the things like set top boxes that put that content on the display.)

I think the sort of box you describe is an interesting notion, and there may well be a market for it. Sony would be well suited to build it.  

I'm still not clear how it might directly benefit Sony's content business, unless you want to get into proprietary content formats only usable by the device and only available from Sony's content arm.  Sony has tried the proprietary route in the past in hardware (Betamax VCRs, Memory Stick mass storage) and in content (the original ebook format used by the Sony Reader was proprietary.)  It has not historically been successful.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: What new platform?
junko.yoshida   8/2/2013 7:20:18 PM
NO RATINGS
DMcCunney, I agree. Proprietary route never worked out for Sony (and never will). And by doing so, I believe it really damaged Sony's credibility. I am hoping that they have learned the lesson by now.

To your question about how the software side of Sony's business can profit from it, I don't think it is reasonable for content side to expect direct and "immediate" benefit from it. Rather, they can take comfort, knowing that their content will be viewed and consumed in the best, most optimal manner -- when consumers used this little smart box of Sony.  

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
George Clooney Rips Dan Loeb
junko.yoshida   8/2/2013 7:28:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, I am glad that I am not alone. It's now me and Clooney.

George Clooney went ballistic on Third Point's Loeb.

http://www.deadline.com/2013/08/george-clooney-slams-sony-investor-daniel-loeb/#utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

pseudoid
User Rank
Manager
Personally speaking… (re: Sony)
pseudoid   8/2/2013 7:42:04 PM
NO RATINGS
...I have always had a big issue with Sony as a consumer.  After all, are we not consumers first and foremost?  As EEs, we are fortunate enough to be of the educated-type of consumers, when it comes to CE [which is a good thing].  Yet, my biggest gripe with Sony is the fact that they have been in the forefront of "format wars" for quite some time. It is an insulting disservice to the general consumers as to how egregious Sony has been in these format wars.

One of the most recent episodes was the HD-DVD versus the BluRay tussle!  A friend, who had innocently purchased the BD version of the movie Matrix, was shocked to find out that it would not play in her DVD player.  I thought to help her take it back to Target and they even denied a replacement on a more suitable format as they felt that 'people' were returning them after making copies of the movies.  This was circa 2008 and a BluRay recorder cost about $900 and blank media was more expensive than BD movies.  This is when I finally started boycotting Sony products.

Let us also not forget the MiniDisc introduction when Sony marketers called it "perfect sound forever" during the technical intro meeting in the Valley for AES members.  The DAT format was another Sony snafu. Please also recall that the original music CD production equipment were actually 14 bit recorders, unbeknownst to consumers.

For a few decades, the Sony ROI was significantly helped by the exploitation of the format wars and has been part of their antiquated business model.

DMcCunney
User Rank
CEO
Re: What new platform?
DMcCunney   8/2/2013 9:52:29 PM
NO RATINGS
In fairness, I was too hard on Sony about being proprietary.  Betamax, for example, was Sony's entry in the VCR market when standards were still being established.  They wanted it to be the standard, but lost to the folks pushing VHS.  And I suspect they wanted the Memory Stick to become a form used by others as well, but it was one more entry in a crowded field, and Sony was the only one who used it.  They should have just gone SD in the first place.

I, too, hope they've learned from the experience.

And agreed on the very indirect benefit to the content side for your proposed device. But arguments for keeping Sony a monolithic organization instead of splitting it into HW and content parts really need synergies between the two, and being able to show direct benefits in having both parts under the same roof.

It still don't think splitting up Sony that way is a good idea, but that's an "It feels wrong!" response.  Thinking it through and figuring out why it feels wrong is a more complicated proposition.  You can make arguments in favor of the split.

MClayton0
User Rank
CEO
Re: What new platform?
MClayton0   8/2/2013 11:45:15 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, splitting out movies is dumb idea, but it REALLY helps those hedge fund guys like Loeb, who love smaller homogeneous businesses which are more volatile, cyclical, and they can make trading money. 

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
Yes, Sony should be split up
KB3001   8/3/2013 1:50:42 PM
NO RATINGS
Not because the current strcuture is inherently unsustainable but because its management (people, structure and processes) have proved incapable of running such a complex structure in a proper way. The financial services side of the business in particular should go.

joondan
User Rank
Rookie
Re: George Clooney Rips Dan Loeb
joondan   8/4/2013 9:24:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Clooney's remark might make sense in terms of an industry problem of not supporting independent art, but it seems a poorly calculated artistic fist-shake against 'the man' that doesn't take into account the consequences of what Loeb is trying to accomplish.  If the CE division is cannibalizing entertainment's profits, maintaining the monolithic Sony empire only results in less reinvestment of those cannibalized profits into the entertainment industry so there's room for the failed, 'art for art's sake' projects he wants to save.  The disappeared note about implications of Sony's empire on LG and Samsung's media aspirations, as though following the Japanese example were the only way Koreans could succeed in media, is just wrong, both factually and in it's arrogance.

Tom Murphy
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Personally speaking… (re: Sony)
Tom Murphy   8/5/2013 12:28:27 PM
NO RATINGS
Pseudoid: Oh, you just reminded me that I got suckererd into buying a mini-disc recorder at one point. Shame on me. But yes, it does reflect on Sony, too.  I still think it's a brilliant hardware company, but it seems like it's been looking for its next big thing ever since the iPod overshadowed the Walkman.

<<   <   Page 4 / 5   >   >>
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week