Breaking News
Blog

How Will President Obama Rule on Apple vs. Samsung?

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
_hm
User Rank
Author
Diplomatic Truce
_hm   8/2/2013 6:27:58 PM
NO RATINGS
As evident from common sense there is no correct answer. Obama can work well as diplomat and with its power of language and being president, will create truce between Apple and Samsung.

 

DSMITH1044
User Rank
Author
Re: More twists and turns
DSMITH1044   8/2/2013 8:25:15 PM
NO RATINGS
As usual we are making something complicated which is really quite simple. Samsung is trying to abuse the FRAND process to gain a competitive advantage. This is clear from its actions in the US and Europe. The case should be thrown out and judicial action should be taken against Samsung. I'm not sure if Samsung is an advertiser withinEET and this is the reason why your publication is reluctant to criticise Samsung. They have been shown to be very comfortable in cheating (gaming performance scores in their devices), stealing intelectual property, paying to have developers marketing their products and paying for bloggers to disparage competitor products on sites like this. Lets not beat about the bush here.


Charles.Desassure
User Rank
Author
It's Election time again...
Charles.Desassure   8/3/2013 11:45:40 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for your wonderful article and trying to explain a complicated process such as the American government, the Court of International trade (CIT) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) laws within and article.  You have indeed earned your paycheck  for the year.  But this is not a situation that will be solved within a few years.  It is likely that everyone will go back to court and there will be more appeals.  You see, in America, if you have money, there is always a hidden law that can be applied if lawyers have more time to research information for the case.  In terms of being heard by the President in this case.  President Obama has more pressing issues like foreign affairs to be concerned about at this time.  By the time this issue goes to court again.... it will be election time.  I look forward to seeing your follow article to this one within the next few years.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Susan Rambo
User Rank
Author
Re: Obama overturned the ban
Susan Rambo   8/4/2013 7:32:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Wow. Thanks, Rick. Here's the link to the veto letter.

m00nshine
User Rank
Author
Re: Obama overturned the ban
m00nshine   8/4/2013 9:37:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Apple spent $1.9mil lobbying US government in 2012 and Samsung spent zero. President overturns ITC verdict after ITC rules for Samsung that apple violated patents. See opensecrets.org Apple files patent suit in home state of California, convinces jury they own rectangles with rounded corners, jury falsely awards $1bil in damages. Hard not to feel like samsung has no chance for fair treatment in US.

BrianBailey
User Rank
Author
Re: Obama overturned the ban
BrianBailey   8/5/2013 1:53:52 AM
NO RATINGS


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000042406

m00nshine
User Rank
Author
Re: Obama overturned the ban
m00nshine   8/5/2013 8:12:45 AM
NO RATINGS
Maybe difficult to understand, but samsung group and samsung electronics are not exactly same. You could also post samsung electronics lobbying statistics

_hm
User Rank
Author
Re: Diplomatic Truce
_hm   8/5/2013 9:36:47 AM
NO RATINGS
President Obama had a very good chance to pratice prudent diplomatic policy and bring Apple and Samsung closer and more oriented towards more innovation. However, this looks failure may be due to lack of time or lack of efforts. It is not tool late for them to convince their logic to South Korean people.

 

eewiz
User Rank
Author
samsung fee
eewiz   8/5/2013 10:02:48 AM
NO RATINGS
Samsung wanted 16$ for a standard essential patent used 12$ infineon chipset used in iPhone. Somebody please donate some common sense to samsung 

http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/08/05/samsungs-vetoed-push-for-an-itc-ban-against-apple-inc-in-pictures

 

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed