Breaking News
Blog

Probing the PICAXE, Part 1

NO RATINGS
2 saves
Page 1 / 3 Next >
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
David Ashton
User Rank
Author
Re: The Ashton-ator
David Ashton   10/21/2013 3:52:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Free Beer!  I'll be there!!!  Thanks guys, I hope I can make it and that we have time for enough that I can buy you one or two as well

selinz
User Rank
Author
Re: The Ashton-ator
selinz   10/21/2013 6:08:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, I don't have to buy the stuff and I don't have to spend the time learning. I can simply read these articles! Thanks for allowing me to "read tinker."

Flabruce
User Rank
Author
Re: PICAXE
Flabruce   10/21/2013 7:29:18 PM
NO RATINGS
     The PicAxe has an associated program called LOGICATOR that makes understanding and programming much easier.  It allows  identification the PIC being programed . Once it is identified you are able to select the configration of the pins for that device as inputs or outputs.  Once these options are selected you can then graphically pick and place the procedures you need.    You can run the simulator using some of the attached view screens for input /outputs, LCD display , variables et. to debug your program.  When it's working on the simulator you can then download it to the PIC.   This program will also convert the flowchart to BASIC and they are usually as short or shorter than if you do it the long way.   It doesn't get much easier than this.

David Ashton
User Rank
Author
Re: PICAXE
David Ashton   10/21/2013 7:42:08 PM
NO RATINGS
@flabruce - you're getting ahead of me here, I was aware of Logicator and was going to have a go at it but haven't got there yet.  It's diffciult to see how it could be easier than I have found it, but that's coming from a pre-knowledge of BASIC.  I hope Max will allow me enough space to get to Logicator....

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed