REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Blog

Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?

Mess with WSTS at our peril
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
phoenixdave
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
phoenixdave   3/7/2012 4:57:15 PM
NO RATINGS
This type of market data is very valuable from a competitive intelligence perspective. Perhaps we are finally seeing a recognition that this data does too much to help the competition.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
krisi   3/7/2012 5:31:33 PM
NO RATINGS
To @Mike Bruzzone, what is wrong with Intel "Intel strategy is to push through molecular at process saturation so they own quantum on long time monopoly gaming"? Many start-up and large companies are looking at quantum computing, if I had a great idea in this space I would had started my own company and hope to be acquired by Intel one day(Unfortunately I don't)...this seems natural to me, Kris P.s Quantum computing is probably 20-30 years from being commercially useful

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
More Blogs
We can count at least 10 ADAS/autonomous vehicle platforms. How will these hardware and software platforms overlap, interact and compete?
To design chips meeting Functional Safety requirements is no cakewalk. What designers need is an automated end-to-end flow to take the guesswork out of Functional Safety design.
The real improvements have been with solid state drives (SSDs), which are based on NAND flash memory.
Details given in an ISSCC conference paper looked like the real thing; this caught the attention of our image-sensor experts inside TechInsights.
When Intel and Samsung joined the fray last Friday by filing amicus briefs in support of the FTC’s complaint against, matters went from bad to worse for Qualcomm
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed