Breaking News
Blog

Semiconductor innovation won't lose steam

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
me3
User Rank
Author
re: Semiconductor innovation won't lose steam
me3   11/28/2012 5:38:24 PM
NO RATINGS
We need a disruptive technology that can break the extreme capital intensive model. Until then, life under someone else's reference flow will be bad. Why stick around when the same skill can be applied to social media?

Broadway Infotech Pty Ltd
User Rank
Author
re: Semiconductor innovation won't lose steam
Broadway Infotech Pty Ltd   11/29/2012 5:46:21 AM
NO RATINGS
After all, every industry matures and slows its rate of change and its rate of growth. During the last ten years, mature commodity industries like oil,

Doug222
User Rank
Author
re: Semiconductor innovation won't lose steam
Doug222   11/29/2012 5:48:06 PM
NO RATINGS
To the statement - "While there are limits to the amount of information they can assimilate effectively, there is a virtually unlimited desire to have access to more information if it is affordable - I would add - if it is affordable "and is actionable knowledge" Turning information into actionable knowledge means huge increases in processing power which means huge increases in transistors. Of course, the algorithms for all this knowledge extraction is a different matter altogether.

SylvieBarak
User Rank
Blogger
re: Semiconductor innovation won't lose steam
SylvieBarak   11/30/2012 1:41:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Some would say it has already... http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-blogs/the-engineering-life-around-the-web/4401575/SPARC-founder--Chip-industry-sorely-needs-innovation-

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...
Navigate to Related Links

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed