Breaking News
Blog

Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?

Mess with WSTS at our peril
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
krisi   3/7/2012 5:31:33 PM
NO RATINGS
To @Mike Bruzzone, what is wrong with Intel "Intel strategy is to push through molecular at process saturation so they own quantum on long time monopoly gaming"? Many start-up and large companies are looking at quantum computing, if I had a great idea in this space I would had started my own company and hope to be acquired by Intel one day(Unfortunately I don't)...this seems natural to me, Kris P.s Quantum computing is probably 20-30 years from being commercially useful

phoenixdave
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
phoenixdave   3/7/2012 4:57:15 PM
NO RATINGS
This type of market data is very valuable from a competitive intelligence perspective. Perhaps we are finally seeing a recognition that this data does too much to help the competition.

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
KB3001   3/6/2012 9:16:49 AM
NO RATINGS
Hi iniewski, I was thinking of the EE/EETimes community at large. Granted, it's great news for consultants :-)

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
krisi   3/5/2012 5:05:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Why is it not good news for us @KB3001? I think it gives us some room to chat, blog, speculate, and maybe even make some money in the process of offering our consulting services ;-)....Kris

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
KB3001   3/5/2012 4:22:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Information is power and companies have every right to withhold it if they can gain a competitive advantage as a result. Of course, it's not good news for us, but times are tough and I can understand the temptation. I guess some form of information sharing will re-emerge at some stage in the future when the market stabilises.

agk
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
agk   3/5/2012 5:59:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Probably the companies feel unsafe to them or they feel that their growth is effected because of the data released, the competition intensified and it is not healthy.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
elctrnx_lyf   3/4/2012 5:40:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Are these services are still useful to any companies to make future decisions or investing in right technologies. I believe the technology is matured to a level where there is not much help due to sharing of information.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
krisi   3/3/2012 3:02:20 PM
NO RATINGS
I think analysts will enjoy this decision...value of their services will increase...Kris

yalanand
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
yalanand   3/3/2012 1:25:44 PM
NO RATINGS
True, Both analysts and data-gatherers will have tough time because they will not get reliable data and real insight into the market.

sharps_eng
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
sharps_eng   3/2/2012 8:08:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Presumably they decided there was no return on their investment in these market information programs. Time for the data-gatherers to regroup and reassess their product.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
More Blogs
Winning products can have viable production lifetimes of decades, despite our "here today, obsolete tomorrow" thinking.
Customized displays don't need to be a complicated and expensive choice for designers and procurement professionals.
This quiz will make you think even more about how and when to use decoupling capacitors in high-speed circuits.
You'd think that the dissonance between excitement over IoT opportunities on one hand and concern about IoT security on the other would yield a rich breeding ground for companies targeting IoT security.
What do all the latest M&A events in the chip industry mean to semiconductor IP companies?
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed