REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Blog

Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
mcgrathdylan   3/1/2012 8:33:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Well said, Peter. But I think it's important to re-state that Intel left the WSTS program only after AMD did. With AMD out, Intel almost had to follow suit. Otherwise, the actual MPU data presented would be just Intel, and Intel may well be understandably uncomfortable putting out this much naked data. I do hope that both companies will reconsider their position on participation. Otherwise, I agree that it's a real shame.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Opinion: Did Intel just break my glasses?
junko.yoshida   3/1/2012 7:40:14 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a very well argued opinion piece. If anyone on our staff who has followed WSTS, SIA numbers closely over years, it's Peter. We heard from some of you -- but silence on this topic from the industry is deafening. I don't think Peter is alone who feels like his own glasses being smashed.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
More Blogs
To design chips meeting Functional Safety requirements is no cakewalk. What designers need is an automated end-to-end flow to take the guesswork out of Functional Safety design.
The real improvements have been with solid state drives (SSDs), which are based on NAND flash memory.
Details given in an ISSCC conference paper looked like the real thing; this caught the attention of our image-sensor experts inside TechInsights.
When Intel and Samsung joined the fray last Friday by filing amicus briefs in support of the FTC’s complaint against, matters went from bad to worse for Qualcomm
So far AMD is making good progress in its return to profitability, but it’s too early to raise the “mission accomplished” banner.
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed