Breaking News
Blog

Forget the iWatch, get ready for Apple iWear

An x86 iWatch? Don't think so
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
HS_SemiPro
User Rank
CEO
re: Forget the iWatch, get ready for Apple iWear
HS_SemiPro   1/8/2013 6:05:08 AM
NO RATINGS
I would really love a good wrist device, I would like a single device that shows time, monitor physical movement, (i.e Calories, distance etc.) and also be used as simple phone for emergemcy, and of course play music, I hate to carry multiple devices when jogging or going in woods

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: Forget the iWatch, get ready for Apple iWear
DrQuine   1/8/2013 3:20:01 AM
NO RATINGS
I think the iPod nano wrist bands illustrate that people are trying to multi-task their devices. We use our SmartPhones for telephoning, music, email, AND checking the time. Current technology batteries already power an ordinary watch as long as it is likely to work. Use the engineering resources developing energy harvesting technologies to solve a real problem: eliminate the need to recharge a laptop computer.

daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: Forget the iWatch, get ready for Apple iWear
daleste   1/8/2013 1:54:41 AM
NO RATINGS
It would be large on the wrist unless it didn't do much. I think I would rather have it in my pocket. Oh, I guess I already do... If anyone can make a couple of million people buy one, it would be Apple.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Forget the iWatch, get ready for Apple iWear
old account Frank Eory   1/8/2013 12:05:25 AM
NO RATINGS
So in other words, expect a wearable wrist device from Apple, much like the Up from Jawbone or the upcoming Flex from FitBit, except that Apple will redefine the category and theirs will be so much more than an activity & sleep tracker. What, it won't be announced at CES? Of course not, since Apple doesn't go to CES. That was kind of an odd thing to be quoted on. As for the advice about processor selection, I doubt you have to worry about Tim Cook's awareness of ARM vs. x86. Let's not forget that Tim's company already has plenty of experience with ARM cores, and it's own chip development team that regularly tapes them out with great success. Oh yeah, and a wearable device needs to consume no more than single-digit milliamps on average -- and that is the real challenge, for both the hardware engineers and the software engineers.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: Forget the iWatch, get ready for Apple iWear
krisi   1/8/2013 12:03:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Cool...pls send me one ;-)...energy harvesting would be really useful, solar of course...temp difference between body and ambient is not large enough though to produce anything useful...I think you get more energy from mechanical vibrations...Kris

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week