Breaking News
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
David Ashton
User Rank
Author
Re: Rectifier?
David Ashton   10/8/2013 5:14:29 PM
NO RATINGS
@bobdvd - the link to the underground history pics had a remark that confirms what I seemed to remember - that they emit heaps of UV and it's not good to look at them for long.

Rcurl
User Rank
Author
Re: Arc Rectifier
Rcurl   10/8/2013 5:11:25 PM
NO RATINGS
These guys are a lot more complicated than I realized. I found this quirky video with an in-depth explanation of how they work: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Oq9VC94vbw

After looking at videos of these tubes in operation, I am amazed at the erratic flickering of the arc.  I would guess that the output is pretty noisy! 

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Author
Re: Arc Rectifier
Caleb Kraft   10/8/2013 4:21:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Here's a direct link to a video of one lit up. Man, so amazingly pretty.

Caleb Kraft
User Rank
Author
Arc Rectifier
Caleb Kraft   10/8/2013 4:20:11 PM
NO RATINGS
That's an Arc Rectifier! I doscovered them in 2010 and was instantly in love. They glow a wonderful blue green!

Here's my article from back then.

Rcurl
User Rank
Author
Re: Rectifier?
Rcurl   10/8/2013 3:59:56 PM
NO RATINGS
bobdvb
User Rank
Author
Re: Rectifier?
bobdvb   10/8/2013 12:33:25 PM
NO RATINGS
It is a Mercury Arc Valve rectifier:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury-arc_valve

http://www.electricstuff.co.uk/mercarc.html

I've seen pictures of them in abandoned buildings:

http://underground-history.co.uk/belsize.php

digital_dreamer
User Rank
Author
Rectifier?
digital_dreamer   10/8/2013 12:13:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Given the specs and the use case, I'd say a rectifier. The tube looks very simple, but I can't see the cathode or anode. What's with all the "empty" space?

MAJ

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed