Breaking News
Signal Processing DesignLine Blog

Time to panic?

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
lokesh.gupta
User Rank
Author
re: Time to panic?
lokesh.gupta   9/22/2008 11:31:33 AM
NO RATINGS
For years, the low level research (involving the Physics of semiconductors) has been lacking behind the demand for new semiconductor products. Perhaps this is the time for the hardware industry to look back again at fundamental research, and propose new fabric for a futuristic hardware. Profit margins have declined because many more companies have dived into the semiconductor technology area after the big boom in the 90s. So there are now many more suppliers than there is demand. This is a period of consolidation, where only the companies with best technologies and deep pockets will survive. Same holds good for individuals and their investments in the market today. If they have enough financial backup plans to survive this downturn, eventually they will come out profitable.

WaveMan0
User Rank
Author
re: Time to panic?
WaveMan0   9/19/2008 11:10:17 PM
NO RATINGS
With the price erosion and ASP's sliding for chips, no wonder semicon industry is less profitable than PC business. They can at least bundle s/w and other add-ons to boost their margins. For an investor, the present and future is software anyway, not board-level hardware. With SDR radio technology, DSP ever more pervasive, the glory days of hardware are over. Have been over for a while now. Having speant years working in Semicon industry, been seeing this happen for a while now. For those looking for jobs, go and try to work in non-commodity hardware industries, like capital test equipment, ATE systems and applications and sales. Forget the chips!

Raseel
User Rank
Author
re: Time to panic?
Raseel   9/19/2008 4:09:46 AM
NO RATINGS
But the financial results from a couple of months ago for biggies like Microsoft, Yahoo and Apple showed an increased Y-o-Y results than previous years. It would seem that the Software companies are not (yet) impacted as much as their hardware counter-parts

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed