Last week, Bloomberg reported that four executives—longtime Intel Corp. exec Pat Gelsinger, Apple Inc. COO Tim Cook, former Hewlett Packard Co. CEO Mark Hurd and Carlyle Group Managing Director Greg Summe—all rejected overtures from AMD regarding its CEO vacancy. The Bloomberg article cited anonymous sources, but also included direct quotes from Gelsinger stating that he rejected AMD's advances because he would prefer to become CEO of his current company, EMC Corp. (EMC's current CEO, Joe Tucci, plans to step down next year).
"We aren’t commenting on any of the rumor/speculation that Bloomberg is reporting," an AMD spokesperson said via email last week. "The search is obviously a priority and the board is moving the process forward to ensure that we select a person with the right vision, experience, and track record to lead AMD into the future and create increased shareholder value over time. We do not plan on communicating further until the search process is concluded."
Thomas Seifert, AMD's chief financial officer and interim CEO, said back in April that the company was actively interviewing CEO candidates (one would hope so) and that the search to fill Meyer's seat was progressing. "The board is very happy with the interest we have received and is actively interviewing candidates," Seifert said at that time.
Meanwhile, with Seifert—who has said he doesn't want to be considered for the permanent CEO position—running the show on a temporary basis, AMD has been humming right along. In April, the company reported first quarter sales and income that beat Wall Street's expectations despite lower shipments for microprocessors and graphics chips. Last week, highly regarded semiconductor industry analyst Craig Berger of FBR Capital Markets upgraded AMD while simultaneously downgrading Intel, saying that AMD might be poised to pick up a few points of market share at Intel's expense from customers like HP, Dell and Acer. Maybe the position of CEO is overrated.
In fairness, it should be pointed out that AMD's stock price, which closed at $6.89 Monday (June 20), is off about 25 percent since Meyer's resignation, (although Berger says AMD's stock is "depressed" ahead of a possible boost in the second half of 2011 from sales of the company’s Fusion accelerated processing units).
"Fifteen to 20 years ago, this search would have been wrapped up in six to eight weeks," said Harry R. Sacks, a veteran recruiter who runs a boutique semiconductor executive search firm, Harry R. Sacks Inc.
Sacks, who is not involved in AMD's CEO search, said there could be any number of reasons why AMD is still searching for its next CEO. For one thing, he said, the number of people qualified to run a high-profile chip company is not that large.
"The way the industry has grown for the past 10 or 20 years, at that corporate management level, there's not a huge talent pool," Saks said.
According to Saks, IBM's CEO search in 1993, which ultimately resulted in Big Blue naming the first CEO in its history to come from outside the company, Lou Gerstner, took around six months.
Gerstner is widely credited with pulling IBM out of a downward spiral. Despite the company's relatively strong performance in the first half of this year, AMD's next CEO faces daunting challenges as well. He or she will be charged with improving AMD's performance in the perpetual battle with AMD while simultaneously positioning the company to face fierce new rivals by going after new markets, including media tablets (many believe that the lack of a timely AMD offering for the white hot tablet market is what led to Meyer's demise). Given the magnitude of these challenges, perhaps it's no wonder that AMD's CEO position remains vacant.
It would be cool to have an experiment with two similar companies: one with expensive CEO, onether with a cheap one...and compare the results in 3 years time...too bad it can't be tried in real life ;-)...or perhaps someone can think of some examples? Kris
"...the right vision, experience, and track record..." are the key components of a CEO. Experience could either be life experience, better be industrial experience. Track record is another proof of his leadership skill. By seeing the success of Google and Facebook, I believe vision is far more important to bring a company to next level and to stay ahead of competitors. Yet, there is great vision and the vision has to align with Board of Directors and more importantly to the skills of the team.
At the risk of 'making it political', George W Bush was the first US president to have an MBA credential in no less than Harvard :)) No matter, how a CEO is chosen, in these times, a new CEO of any company has to HIT THE GROUND RUNNING. Period.
Interesting, but most companies hire CEOs for their network of associates to build additional market connection points. I remember there was an individual who would search out CEOs academic credentials and would find many had falsification or none at all. So we know academics is not the precursor to being a good CEO. Heck, look at the ranks of our politicians for example. So what does it take to be a good CEO, first and foremost is to be a trust worthy steward for the employees, second to be have integrity beyond just cashing in on stock options, and have a passion for leadership versus just ego power. Hmmm... difficult qualities for sure to find in this fast pace world.
Some companies believe in CEOs coming through the 'ranks' on the idea that (s)he has seen the ups and downs of the company before and would know how to deal with the same. Some believe in 'air-dropping' CEOs on the idea that (s)he will think out of the box with a fresh/new perspective. There is no truism on which is better. Finally CEO is all about DECISION-MAKING. Being conservative is easy and 'safe', but that will not help in times like now!
The CEO position needs to be someone highly regarded in the industry but also someone who is flambouyant and a little odd. It is easy to be conservative and run the company by the numbers, but if you find someone with that extra touch, the company can move forward faster than the competitors. Good luck, AMD.
CEO job is not overrated, CEOs are overrated. Mostly companies rely on 'credentials' of a person and often take a conservative decision. Start-ups often take risks when they are starting and not once they make the first splash. So a college drop-out may start a company but if the company becomes 'big', they go to 'business school' tag to look for the CEO! Decision making and risk taking cannot be taught in colleges.
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.