The two winning definitions show much about high-school and middle-school students' different priorities.

The students have voted and we have two winning definitions in the inaugural "Define Yourself" contest. High-school and middle-school students were asked to vote separately to choose the definition for "Engineer"
that they found the clearest and most understandable, while also being
interesting and inspirational. Their choices give some insight into the
two age groups' different priorities:

Out of the final five definitions from the EE Times readers, the high schoolers chose, "An
engineer designs an optimal solution to a problem using available
parts, processes, and materials. Sometimes this includes invention of
new parts, processes, or materials." from RWatkins with 44% of the votes. This literal definition that emphasizes the problem-solving challenges of engineering seemed to catch the older students' imaginations.

The middle-school students went for the more poetic and I think lofty definition. Their highest-ranking was, "An
engineer is someone who takes the creativity of an artist, the knowledge
of a scientist, the imagination of a writer, and the stamina of an
athlete and turns science fiction into reality." with 67% of the votes and it came from snakinator.

RWatkins and snakinator will each receive a Certificate of Brilliance
designed by illustrator Daniel Guidera showing their definitions.

Voting for the best definition of "Hacker" will begin soon!

I agree that middle-schoolers are quite bright individuals...and even younger than that!
When I was just 7 years old, I wrote out my theory of how the planets formed by the accretion of dust particles (I still have the paper!), only to be laughed at by my science teacher. Many years later, that same theory was embraced by cosmologists...never underestimate a child's imagination!

I'm with the middle schoolers. The question that interests me is - what are we doing with our middle schoolers to turn them into high schoolers? The difference in the two choices says to me that somehow we're maybe knocking the stuffing out of them.

In that case, there are engineers that exist only on paper (i.e. have the degree and PE license), and there are engineers that exist in practice (technicians, mechanics, and many others with less formal training).

Mr VectorForce, please put your engineering hat on, develop a design that fits the problem at hand, and declare that your first step will be 512/1023 of the distance to the target, then your steps will be
512, 768, 896, 960, 992, 1008, 1016, 1020, 1022, and finally 1023 parts of the 1023 divisor. QED! Our job as engineers is not to question IF it can be done, but determine HOW to do it.

Actually, the problem would have to be each step is less than half the distance to the target. As worded, just take one step all the way to the target.

A mathematician, a scientist and an engineer are given with a problem to resolve for a great prize. They can take up to 10 steps to reach a target, but each step must be no greater than half the size of the previous step.
The mathematician declares it mathematically impossible.
The scientist says it appears impossible but will try it, which he does and proves it's impossible.
The engineer thinks a bit and says "ten steps gives us an answer to better than 0.1%, which is within reasonable measurement tolerances for this problem, I claim the prize".

To save this item to your list of favorite EE Times content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.

If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.