For those frantically stockpiling canned tuna in their underground bunkers or saying their final goodbyes to those around them, you may be being a little melodramatic. Or just plain wrong, according to NASA.
In a video leaked a week early, entitled “Why the world didn’t end yesterday,” NASA attempted to dispel fears that the world was about to be destroyed by a freak planetary incident and assuage people with the cold hard facts.
"The world will not end in 2012," NASA said. "Our planet has been getting along just fine for more than four billion years, and credible scientists worldwide know of no threat associated with 2012."
Don Yeomans, head of NASA’s near earth object program stated that no known asteroids or comets were on a collision course with earth, neither is a rogue planet coming to destroy us.
In the video, NASA Astrobiologist David Morrison claims that if there were anything out there, like a planet headed for earth, “it would already be one of the brightest objects in the sky. Everyone on earth could see it. You don’t need to ask the government, just go out and look, it’s not there.”
For those claiming that solar flares will be earth’s fiery end in five days’ time, NASA makes short work of that theory too. Lika Guhathakurta, head of NASA’s living with a star program said the sun had been flaring for billions of years, long before the Mayans even existed, and so far, it’s not destroyed the world yet.
True, the sun is approaching the maximum of its 11 year activity cycle, but Guhathakurta went as far as to describe it as the “wimpiest” solar cycle of the past 50 years. Harsh.
So, what’s the deal and how did the Mayan’s get it so wrong? Perhaps it was all just a big misunderstanding. In a statement on the NASA website set up to field questions about Dec. 21, the organization said the date was simply the end of the Mayan long-count period. “Just as your calendar begins again on January 1 -- another long-count period begins for the Mayan calendar."
Phew. Panic avoided. Until the next “end of the world” date emerges, you’re safe for now, Nostradamus. Related Stories:
I'd be a lot more concerned with Windows 8 than the Mayan calendar. It sounds like it's everything I don't want in an operating system. What's up with those folks in Redmond? Don't they understand some of us use computers as tools, not entertainment. My company is still using XP. We're about to roll out Win 7 and I'm not looking forward to the churn this will cause my system. Yeah, the IT folks have been testing 7 for over a year, blah, blah, blah, but with every "upgrade", there is ALWAYS pain and suffering, especially with the engineering tools which the IT folks understand the least.
But what about Dark Matter and Dark Energy?
They can't be up to anything good!
NASA's keeping mum on this and I, for one, expect that there's a dark satanic conspiracy at the root of it. NASA's “Why the world didn’t end yesterday" is probably just a cover-up to shield us from the real truth that ancient reptilian aliens, disguised as human, are exploiting the earth for their own financial gain.
Did you see my EOTWAWKI (End Of The World As We Know It) blog in which all is explained: http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-blogs/the-engineering-life-around-the-web/4234020/Counting-down-to-the-EOTWAWKI
I guess the possibility of the calendar just starting over escaped the gloom and doom people.
I guess they missed the part about the calendar being 5200 years before it resets.
Much ado about nothing, really.
People act like the sky is falling. Didn't we go through that with the Y2K idiocy?
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.