Breaking News
Opinion

Raspberry Pi & BeagleBone Black: An Interesting Pair

NO RATINGS
1 saves
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Garcia-Lasheras
User Rank
Author
Face to Face
Garcia-Lasheras   7/5/2013 6:52:31 AM
NO RATINGS
Hi Duane. I think you are covering a very interesting topic, as these little rascals are   likely the most widely used SBCs for running OS -- both by hobbyist and professional projects.

I've worked with the BeagleBone, while I've only studied the RaspBerry technical specs. In my oppinion, while they are very similar in so many aspects, there are critical differences too -- multimedia capabilities, industrial control peripherals... and openness of the hardware design!!

It's worthy enough to take a deeper look, so I'm eager to know more about your oppinion & experience with these platforms!

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: Face to Face
Max The Magnificent   7/5/2013 12:14:36 PM
NO RATINGS
@Garcia: When I look at the capabilities of the BeagleBone and the Raspberry Pi, I can;t help but shake my head in wonder... I remember when the first SBCs were advertized in hobbyist electronics magazines in the UK -- 8-bit micro, 1KB ROM, 1KB RAM, a couple of 7-segment LED displays, and a hex keypad... and there was no way I could afford one.

 

Compare this to what you can get these days for such a small cost... we certainly do live in exciting times...

Duane Benson
User Rank
Author
Re: Face to Face
Duane Benson   7/6/2013 1:08:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Garcia - I'd be interested to hear about some of your experiences with the Beaglebone. I used the original Beagleboard several years ago and, while it was pretty revolutionary for its time, the Beaglebone is much more refined.

I still can't believe the performance you get for the price with these newest SBCs.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Author
Re: Face to Face
Duane Benson   7/6/2013 1:14:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Max - 1k RAM and ROM?! That was big-time. My SBC back then only had 256 bytes of RAM and 32 bytes of ROM. At least it had both ones and zeros.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed