datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

Design Article

Digital-Input Class D amplifiers expand the benefits of traditional Class D and simplify system design

Matt Felder, Senior Member of Technical Staff, and Evan Ragsdale, Strategic Applications Engineer, Maxim Integrated Products

11/3/2012 3:08 PM EDT

Introduction

A new generation of digital-input Class D audio amplifiers achieves high PSRR performance that is comparable to traditional analog Class D amplifiers. More importantly, digital-input Class D amplifiers provide additional benefits of reduced power, complexity, noise, and system cost.  

Electronics vendors commonly use high-efficiency, filterless, analog-input Class D amplifiers to manage the power requirements of portable audio speakers found in cell phones, tablet computers, and personal navigation devices. These Class D amplifiers allow direct connection to a battery which minimizes losses and reduces component count. The amplifiers also achieve >70dB PSRR performance which is important to avoid audible buzzing with 217Hz demodulated GSM signals. 

Analog-input Class D amplifiers normally require a DAC and line driver amp on the application processor (Figure 1), and this adds die cost, power, and noise to the speaker output. These Class D amplifiers also require careful board design to avoid degradation because of signals coupling onto the analog board routes.


Figure 1. Conventional system with analog-input Class D speaker amps. The DAC and line driver amp on the application processor add die cost, power, and noise to the speaker output.

Digital-input Class D audio amplifiers are immune to most board design issues. Single-channel Class D amplifiers can be placed at remote locations on a board to minimize the routing of the high-current battery and speaker load connections. These amplifiers do not need the DAC and line driver amp of analog-input Class D designs. Thus, space and system costs drop and designs are simpler.

Simplified System Design

The most common type of digital-input for an amplifier is pulse-density modulation (PDM) which requires only two wires: PDM_CLK and PDM_DATA. Single-bit PDM data is created with an oversampled sigma-delta modulator on the application processor (Figure 2).   


Figure 2. System with a PDM-input Class D speaker amp requires only two wires and uses oversampled sigma-delta modulator on the application processor to create single-bit data. 

A few amplifiers will accept pulse-code modulated (PCM) or I2S data which requires three wires: BCLK, LRCLK, and DIN. The PCM data format does not require a modulator or upsampling of the data on the application processor (Figure 3). Some older implementations of PCM-input amplifiers also require a clean master clock (MCLK) to derive a jitter-free sampling clock. Newer PCM input amplifiers like the MAX98355 no longer require the MCLK input so pin count, power consumption, and board complexity are all reduced.

Figure 3. A system with a PCM-input Class D speaker amp uses three wires but does not require a modulator or upsampling of the data on the application processor.

Older digital-input amplifiers offer adjustable sample rate and/or bit depth that, in some cases, require complex programming of the amplifier. Newer generations of digital-input amplifiers like the MAX98355/MAX98356 automatically detect a wide range of sample rates and bit depths to self-configure without any programming.

In a multichannel implementation the digital-input Class D audio amplifier reduces the number of external capacitors and routed lines on the board. Only PDM_CLK and PDM_DATA lines are needed for PDM inputs to provide stereo data to two Class D amplifiers. The BCLK, LRCLK, and DIN lines are needed for PCM inputs to provide stereo data. As a comparison, a stereo analog-input Class D amplifier will normally require two differential input signals (four wires) to be routed with AC-coupling capacitors. (See Figures 1, 2, and 3.)

Most digital-input amplifiers require both a low digital-supply voltage (1.8V) and a high speaker-supply voltage (2.5V to 5.5V). Now board design and component count can be simplified by using a single-supply Class D amplifier like the MAX98355/MAX98356. 





Dale Shpak

11/9/2012 4:19 PM EST

Class D is capable of extremely good fidelity. If the input signal is digital it is best to stay digital right up to the output stage, even for audiophile applications.
However, it would be instructive to know how the jitter tolerance is achieved since dynamic performance is important for audio, not just sinusoidal steady state.

Sign in to Reply



matt_felder

11/16/2012 10:32 AM EST

The design methodology for achieving the extraordinarily high jitter tolerance is proprietary. Jitter tolerance is worst for the highest frequency and highest amplitude input signals which would be a full scale 20KHz sinusoid. And for this test case only the THD+N is degraded, not the dynamic range. Normal audio signals have much lower susceptibility to jitter than a full scale 20KHz signal. However, where this DAC really shines is at very low signal levels (quiet part of audio) where high frequency jitter can mix with out-of-band noise to degrade the audio band noise floor. This is what normally sets the jitter tolerance for audio DACs.

Sign in to Reply



BradWood

11/13/2012 7:15 PM EST

I'd also like to hear more about PSR. It is one thing to have a small PS feedthrough at a bridge output at zero signal, quite another to avoid gain modulation when there is a signal present. Correcting for power supply fluctuations in either the analog or digital domain is not trivial.

Brad

Sign in to Reply



matt_felder

11/20/2012 12:50 PM EST

You are correct that many (if not most) Class D amplifiers show substantially degraded PSRR under the presence of a real output signal. Some amplifiers rely on matching of the output bridge to get acceptable PSRR, but without feedback this falls apart as soon as there is some input signal present. Good PSRR at low signal levels is important because any supply noise would be more audible. However, reasonable PSRR at normal audio level is also important. The MAX98355/356 parts maintain its specified 217Hz PSRR performance (typical of 77dB PSRR) even while driving 1.5Watts into a 4ohm load. This is something that many Class D designs simply cannot demonstrate.

Sign in to Reply



Ignite Engineering

11/14/2012 10:54 AM EST

"All Digital" is only ever found in open loop Class D amplifiers, which perform horribly. The output stages of Class D amplifiers have analog ideosyncrasies that require feedback correction. And the power supply ripple and modulation due to source resistance are best dealt with through feedback as well. The best THD and noise performance is achieved when this feedback done in the analog realm.
BTW that "Gain Control" block in the MAX98356 is an ADC set up to compensate for power supply ripple. It's not so "all digital" after all.

Sign in to Reply



matt_felder

11/16/2012 10:31 AM EST

MAX98355/356 would not be considered an “all digital” design. You are correct that feedback is needed to achieve good PSRR and THD performance. There are multiple possible implementation methods to achieve the feedback and gain control that is specified in this design.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)