datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

Design Article

Op amps in small-signal audio design - Part 3: Selecting the right op amp

Douglas Self

7/27/2011 12:04 PM EDT

The LM4562 Op-Amp

The LM4562 is a new op-amp, which first became freely available at the beginning of 2007. It is a National Semiconductor product. It is a dual op-amp – there is no single or quad version. It costs about 10 times as much as a 5532.

The input noise voltage is typically 2.7 nV/√Hz, which is substantially lower than the 4 nV/√Hz of the 5532. For suitable applications with low source impedances this translates into a useful noise advantage of 3.4 dB.

The bias current is 10 nA typical, which is very low and would normally imply that bias cancellation, with its attendant noise problems, was being used. However, in my testing I have seen no sign of excess noise, and the data sheet is silent on the subject. No details of the internal circuitry have been released so far, and quite probably never will be.

It is not fussy about decoupling and, as with the 5532, 100 nF across the supply rails close to the package should ensure HF stability. The slew rate is typically ±20 V/µs, more than twice as quick as the 5532.

The first THD plot in Figure 4.22 shows the LM4562 working at a closed-loop gain of 2.2× in shunt-feedback mode, at a high level of 10 Vrms. The top of the THD scale is 0.001%, something you will see with no other op-amp in this survey. The no-load trace is barely distinguishable from the AP SYS-2702 output, and even with a heavy 500 Ω load driven at 10 Vrms there is only a very small amount of extra THD, reaching 0.0007% at 20 kHz.

Figure 4.22: The LM4562 in shunt-feedback mode, with 1 kΩ, 2k2 feedback resistors giving a gain of 2.23. Shown for no load (NL) and 1 kΩ, 500 Ω loads. Note the vertical scale ends at 0.001% this time. Output level is 10 Vrms, ±18 V supply rails

Figure 4.23 shows the LM4562 working at a gain of 3.2× in series-feedback mode, both modes having a noise gain of 3.2×. The extra distortion from 500 Ω loading is barely detectable.

Figure 4.23: The LM4562 in series-feedback mode, with 1 kΩ, 2k2 feedback resistors giving a gain of 3.23×. No load (NL) and 500 Ω load. Output 10 Vrms, ±18 V supply rails

For Figures 4.23 and 4.24 the feedback resistances were 2k2 and 1 kΩ, so the minimum source resistance presented to the inverting input is 687 Ω. In Figure 4.24 extra source resistances were then put in series with the input path (as was done with the 5532 in the section above on common-mode distortion) and this revealed a remarkable property of the LM4562 – it is much more resistant to common-mode distortion than the 5532.

Figure 4.24: The LM4562 in series-feedback mode, gain 3.23×, with varying extra source resistance in the input path. The extra distortion is much lower than for the 5532. Output 10 Vrms, ±18 V supply rails

At 10 Vrms and 10 kHz, with a 10 kΩ source resistance the 5532 generates 0.0014% THD (see Figure 4.6) but the LM4562 gives only 0.00046% under the same conditions. I strongly suspect that the LM4562 has a more sophisticated input stage than the 5532, probably incorporating cascoding to minimize the effects of common-mode voltages.

Note that only the rising curves to the right represent actual distortion. The raised levels of the horizontal traces at the LF end are due to Johnson noise from the extra series resistance. It has taken an unbelievably long time – nearly 30 years – for a better audio op-amp than the 5532 to come along, but at last it has happened. The LM4562 is superior in just about every parameter, but it has much higher current noise. At present it also has a much higher price, but hopefully that will change.





Dr. HD

7/28/2011 7:18 PM EDT

It isn't true that the LM4562 has no "single" version. The LM4562 is actually the dual of the LME49710 and is therefore exactly the same as the LME49720. The LM4562 was released first, and the single version was then developed. By the time the single was released, National had changed their numbering scheme; the original plan was to phase out the LM4562 number and use just LME49720, but the former had gained too much traction in the market place. Interestingly enough, the LM4562 is less expensive, in small quantities at least.

National have some other very impressive op amps in the LME series, most notably the LME49713, which is a current-feedback op amp with similarly ultra-low distortion, ultra-wide bandwidth, ultra-high slew rate, lower noise, and higher output current capability (at least ±93 mA)

Other op-amps worth mentioning are the new AD8597 (single) & AD8599 (dual) from TI. These have been released since Doug's book was published and are recommended by TI over the AD797; which is very nice of TI given that the AD797 is considerably more expensive!

Sign in to Reply



Dr. HD

7/29/2011 5:22 AM EDT

doh! The AD8597, 8599 and 797 parts are of course from Analog Devices. Note to self: the clue's in the part number!

Sign in to Reply



Rene Prevo

8/3/2011 7:29 AM EDT

The article talks about low noise, but what are levels of the noise in the audio range (1Hz to 20000 Hz)?

RP

Sign in to Reply



Hughston

8/3/2011 5:35 PM EDT

To calculate the noise in the audio bandwidth you have to add all the noise components in an RMS fashion then multiply them by a bandwidth factor like 1.57 x sqrt (BW). The factor depends upon the slope of the filtering beyond the 3 dB points. 1.57 in this case is for single pole filtering. There are app notes for this on the ADI and Intersil web sites.

Sign in to Reply



kendallcp

8/3/2011 5:50 PM EDT

That's not quite accurate. You need to multiply the noise spectrum by the frequency response that it's exposed to, and then rms it up (square it and integrate over the bandwidth). If the response is a single-pole low-pass, that 1.57x factor (over sqrt(BW))pops up automatically from the integration. The methods are equivalent if the noise density is flat with frequency, but it often isn't.

Sign in to Reply



sinsinsin49

8/5/2011 3:07 AM EDT

What I don't understand is that the modern, real audio opamps: LME49990, OPA1611, and OPA211 were omitted! They all are superior in performance compared to those that have been presented.

With properly designed LME49990 based circuitry it is actually possible to do 24-bit quality analog work.

Please explain.

Sign in to Reply



Jay Sinnett

8/10/2011 10:31 AM EDT

In the circuit description of the 5532, Doug says he doesn't understand the function of Q14. I am not the designer, but I think he was on the right track when he referred to clamping. It's plain to see that Node 3 rides at about 2Vbe above the neg supply (Q8 + Q9). If node 3 (the collector of Q9) starts to go below 1Vbe, then Q14 turns on and sucks current out of Node 2, limiting the drive to Q8 + Q9. In effect, this prevents the collector voltage of Q9 from ever going below about 1Vbe. In other words, it prevents Q9 from going into "hard saturation." Hard saturation causes slow recovery time - so the purpose of Q14 is to keep the circuit recovery time fast whenever the output stage has approached the negative rail. At least that's my guess.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)