Design Article
Product How-To: 350W + 350W Class D power amp in the size of an iPod
Jun Honda, Yasushi Nishimura and Liwei Zheng
8/23/2011 1:44 PM EDT
Class D was invented decades ago when there were no power devices to achieve commercially viable performance figures. Sony introduced the first Class D audio amplifier product, the TA-N88 in 1979. It used a power JFET called Vertical FET (V-FET) switching at 500kHz. The FET was not easy to handle as it was a normally-on device. The large input capacitances necessitated a large gate driver stage with To-220 BJTs with heatsink. Yet it demonstrated what Class D can bring to audio amplification.
With today’s state-of-the-art MOSFET technology, a practical power MOSFET can achieve well above 90% power efficiency in the Class D output stage. One simple way to see how the device is close to the ideal power switching device is to take a look at an R*Qg figure of merit (FOM). On silicon technology, on resistance (RDS(ON)) and gate charge (Qg) oppose each other. In other words, the lower the RDS(ON), the higher the gate charge will be, hence slower the switching.
To achieve the highest efficiency in Class D amplifiers, conduction loss from RDS(ON) and switching loss from switching speed dictated by Qg need to be optimized. Figure 2 illustrates how an optimal die size for a given output power is chosen. The minimal power loss is at an optimal die size. As the device technology advances, the total power loss at the optimal point reduces and the die size gets smaller, allowing for better performance and smaller system size

Improvement in RDS(ON) and Qg FOM indicates the advancements in power MOSFET technology. For example, let’s take a look at the two 100V rated devices that are a couple of generations a part. The IRF540 planer structure from the 1980s has 66m ohms with 55nC of Qg. The latest trench structure MOSFET IRF6665 is a 53m ohms device with 8.4nC gate charge. The FOMs are 3,300 and 445 respectively, showing the latest MOSFET has greater than 7 times better FOM. The newer MOSFET requires much lower gate drive effort to achieve the switching speed, consequently lower switching power loss.
Integrated Class D driver
To form a practical Class D amplifier, there are four essential functions; gate driver, level shifting, deadtime generation and under-voltage lockout protection (UVLO). Each of these functions is complex and involves a mixture of analog and logic circuitries. The high device counts encourages the integration of all four functions into a single IC.
In order to enjoy the benefits of state-of-the-art power MOSFETs, precise control of the gate drive signal is crucial. Stable deadtime control and level shifting to control the MOSFET according to the PWM signal from the modulator section are vital. Deadtime is a major source of non-linearity in Class D amplifiers. Insertion of deadtime increases distortion as it modulates the gain in the Class D power stage as it reduces the duty cycle of each MOSFET.
While motor drive inverters require 500ns to 1us deadtime range, a high-performance Class D amplifier has a stringent deadtime requirement of one tenth of these values. The amount of deadtime is primarily dictated by the switching speed of the MOSFET but in reality a design uses 2 to 3 times the amount of deadtime to deal with propagation variability in the gate driver stage. MOSFETs with better FOA require a smaller deadtime amount from the faster switching speed, therefore, contributing to better linearity.
Robust protection features are as important as the Class D loop controls. Gate driver ICs should offer under-voltage lock-out (UVLO) protection to protect the MOSFETs from operation in the linear mode that can damage them. Other protection features include thermal shutdown and over-current protection.
The nature of the power dissipation source in Class D in an over-loaded condition result from conduction loss from RDS(ON). Monitoring a voltage across the MOSFET while it is in an on state is a good way to sense over-loading conditions. This scheme does not take any additional power shunt device that degrades efficiency and requires a large footprint. A bonus feature from the RDS(ON) based current sensing is that sensitivity of load current detection increases with MOSFET temperature, making the over current protection much more robust.
Next: Design Example


Robotics Developer
8/25/2011 3:08 PM EDT
Very nice compact design! Is there a possible way to get the PCBs or a kit? Just wondering...
Sign in to Reply
studleylee
8/25/2011 7:14 PM EDT
https://ec.irf.com/v6/en/US/adirect/ir?cmd=catSearchFrame&domSendTo=byID&domProductQueryName=IRAUDAMP10
Sign in to Reply
studleylee
8/25/2011 7:04 PM EDT
I'm Salivating big time!!!!
Sign in to Reply
fdunn
8/25/2011 8:54 PM EDT
Love it!
So when is the author going to release it in kit form or fully assembled?
Also what is the max current for the +/- 50Vdc power supply and how much noise is allowed on these lines (ie: can a switchmode power supply be used?)
Sign in to Reply
turboeclipse
8/29/2011 3:07 PM EDT
This is a half-bridge design! What about power supply pumping issues at low frequencies? This could result in destruction of the power supply and amplifier.
Sign in to Reply
kendallcp
8/29/2011 3:19 PM EDT
"Class D topology is perfect in theory. It is free from non-linearity, meaning there is zero distortion"
Boy, these guys have got a big disappointment coming! The best switching amplifiers can perform well and sound great, but let's take it easy with the hyperbole.
Sign in to Reply
1Sparky
8/29/2011 7:27 PM EDT
Curious article, I see more work in Class D amps which seem to have never been mentioned in Audiophile circles(at least I only hear it in derision and casual glances)...My take on it is that the 'D' System will ultimately be less reliable than a comparable Class A system. You will need digital filtering and expensive power supply components, quite a bit more complex designs and similar high-priced devices...I am surprised the Japanese authors seem to be unaware of their forefathers' interest in Hi-Fi, as they made some really high quality gear in the 70's and 80's! The first statement gets me too...as cost was seldom an issue in the pursuit of premium sound in those days; 'trade-off' seldom entered the conversation! If I ever run across a 'stereo system' touting Class D innards, I'll be sure to have a careful listen.
Sign in to Reply
1Sparky
8/29/2011 7:37 PM EDT
btw, Radio and other kinds of tubes known as Audion, valve, Triode, etc. are patented by some and developed by others. Tesla deserves a mention in this circle and, in general, naming a device is sufficient as there is much uncertainty about the personalities behind 'ownership' of any technology.
Sign in to Reply
sime_attero
8/31/2011 8:22 AM EDT
1Sparky:
These IR Class-D modulators are closed loop, and as such can run quite happily on a basic (and cheap) unregulated power supply. The PSRR of this design is roughly comparable to other closed loop A and AB designs.
Power supply pumping is definitely a very real issue, and many half-bridge stereo amplifiers run the two channels out of phase and reverse the speaker output terminals on one channel to preserve absolute phase on both channels. Since power supply pumping tends to be a low-frequency, high amplitude issue, and low-frequency content in most program material is pretty "mono", this approach effectively eliminates any danger from power supply pumping.
Sign in to Reply
sinsinsin49
9/1/2011 2:53 AM EDT
I would like to see the +/-50V power supply for this amplifier "in the size of an(other) iPod". Where should I look?
Sign in to Reply
andigtech
9/1/2011 10:01 AM EDT
Well sinsinsin49 is right. The IR Class-D Audio Amp exists for quite some time but I never got a response from IR regarding a suitable SMPS. I was working on a DJ surface controller two years back and we intended to include an AMP right into the unit so that a portable party machine could be realized. But dropped it due to the SMPS issues. Also DC protection is important. Who wants $$$$ speakers to be fried !!!
Sign in to Reply
Tom.ChaklosJr.
9/16/2011 3:21 PM EDT
I went to IR's website and this Reference design is not yet being sold. But the other ones all cost about $300 each. Here is the link to thier ref design page.
http://www.irf.com/technical-info/refdesigns/audiokits.html
Sign in to Reply