datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

Design Article

A new audio amplifier topology with push-pull transimpedance stage - Part 2: Biasing, stability and AC performance

Samuel Groner

9/26/2012 11:05 AM EDT

8. Adaptation to Other Input Stage Topologies

So far we have considered the application of the new transimpedance stage to standard voltage feedback input stages with one differential pair only. However, it is perfectly feasible to adapt the new second stage to other input stage structures. Below I will give some examples of this.

In figure 8, an amplifier with complementary differential input pairs is sketched. The output current of each differential pair is made single-ended by an according current mirror (Q5 and Q6, or Q7 and Q8) and subsequently level-shifted to the common input node of the transimpedance stage by folded cascodes Q9 and Q10.

Figure 8: Novel transimpedance stage adapted to an input stage with complementary differential pairs.

With suitable, minor input stage modifications [8] such an amplifier can be designed to support very high slew rates. Note that, compared to the topology from figure 2, there is only one compensation capacitor and no need for a second stage bias control circuit. As for any of the following examples, the use of low-voltage regulated power supplies for the amplifier front-end (as detailed in section 7) is fully supported.

The simplest form of current feedback is implemented as shown in figure 9. This topology is particularly applicable to low level preamplifiers, as only one transistor, Q1, acts as primary noise source. I1 is optional to reduce the rather large bias current flowing from the inverting input terminal. Two amplifiers of this structure may be used to form the front-end of an instrumentation amplifier, such as is in frequent use in transformerless microphone preamplifiers [12].

Figure 9: Single-ended current feedback amplifier.

Further improvements regarding large-signal performance may be made with a complementary current feedback input stage (see figure 10).

Figure 10: Complementary current feedback input stage combined with new push-pull second stage.

Most complementary current feedback amplifiers are based on one-stage topologies; figure 10 however represents a full two-stage architecture, with the resulting advantages regarding open-loop gain (in the context of current feedback amplifiers usually referred to as transimpedance), insensitivity to loading from the power output stage and distortion. Although not discussed further, the use of two transimpedance stages and a suitable amplifier subcircuit for common-mode feedback will permit the design of fully differential amplifiers [13].

Coming up in Part 3: Experimental verification.

References
[1] Douglas Self: Audio Power Amplifier Design Handbook, 5th edition, Focal Press, 2009
[2] Bob Cordell: Designing Audio Power Amplifiers, 1st edition, McGraw-Hill, 2010
[3] J. E. Solomon: TheMonolithicOp Amp: A Tutorial Study, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 314–332, December 1974
[4] Bhupendra K. Ahuja: An Improved Frequency Compensation Technique for CMOS Operational Amplifiers, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-18, no. 6, pp. 629–633, December 1983
[5] Samuel Groner: Comments on Audio Power Amplifier Design Handbook by Douglas Self, February 2011, available for download from www.sg-acoustics.ch/analogue_audio/power_amplifiers/pdf/audio_power_amp_design_comments.pdf
[6] Bruno Putzeys: The F-word - or,why there is no such thing as too much feedback, Linear Audio, vol. 1, pp. 112–132, April 2011
[7] Royal A. Gosser, Jeffrey A. Townsend: Integrated-Circuit (IC) AmplifierWith Plural Complementary Stages, US Patent 5,537,079, filed December 1994, issued July 1996
[8] Giovanni Stochino: Ultra-fast amplifier, Electronics &WirelessWorld, pp. 835–841, October 1995
[9] Alberto Bilotti: Noise Characteristics of Current Mirror Sinks/Sources, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-10, no. 6, pp. 516–524, December 1975
[10] William H. Gross: New High Speed Amplifier Designs, Design Techniques and Layout Problems, Analog Circuit Design: Operational Amplifiers, Analog to Digital Convertors, Analog Computer Aided Design, Springer, 1993
[11] William F. Davis, Robert L. Vyne: Design Techniques for Improving the HF Response of a Monolithic JFET Operational Amplifier, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-19, no. 6, pp. 978–985, December 1984
[12] Graeme John Cohen: Double Balanced Microphone Amplifier, AES preprint, no. 2106, August 1984
[13] Bruno Putzeys: High-Performance Discrete Building Blocks for Balanced Audio Signal Processing, AES preprint, no. 6294, October 2004

About the author
Samuel Groner was born and currently lives in Zurich, Switzerland. He has been passionate about both art and science as long as he can remember. At present he works for Weiss Engineering Ltd. in the field of analogue hardware design and freelances as classical recording engineer/producer. Besides this, he teaches several courses at a local sound engineering school (ear training, classical music production and audio measurement) and enjoys a manifold activity as pianist, singer and choirmaster. If time permits, he is found on one of the numerous Swiss hiking trails, preferably in company with one of his cameras and a few sheets of black-and-white film. He holds a MSc degree in computer science and a MA degree as Tonmeister (recording engineer/producer).

This article originally appeared in Linear Audio Volume 2, September 2011. Linear Audio, a book-size printed tech audio resource, is published half-yearly by Jan Didden.

For more articles like this and others related to audio design, visit Audio Designline and/or subscribe to the monthly Audio newsletter (free registration).





Raul_77

9/29/2012 9:21 AM EDT

Hi, sorry for my english.

About the power supply rejection, in this old Luxman:

http://www.eserviceinfo.com/download.php?fileid=48149

can be see the use of differents supplies for each stage of the power amp in a cheap and good way, the effect in the sound quality are very good.

Sign in to Reply



WKetel

10/3/2012 8:48 PM EDT

I have always worked to get rid of all the power supply noise so that the high level of power supply noise rejection that was required was not so great. In addition, the tolerance of components needed to filter out power supply noise are far less critical than those needed for good amplifier PSRR design. Probably a combination of the two methods would be the best choice. Of course, optimizing for the minimum cost was never the highest priority for our group, nor for our customers. Somebody else can always make something cheaper and not quite as good.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)