Design Article
Developing an automotive electrical distribution system: Part 3 - 'Pain points' in the design flow
Mark Colonnese, Mentor Graphics Integrated Electrical Systems
4/25/2007 6:02 PM EDT
Part 2 looked at simulation and analysis techniques that can be applied to an electrical distribution design flow to make it more efficient and less costly.
Building automotive electronics wiring harnesses is a tough businessonly the fittest suppliers survive. Harness makers are challenged with delivering products that are increasingly complexand with improved quality at a lower price tag. Standing still is not an option, as competitors are constantly battling to snatch market share.
To remain competitive and preserve margins, harness makers are forced to continually innovate in all areas of their business. This installment looks at some key design process issues facing automotive harness makers and assesses the impact of these concerns. Part 4 will go on to describe how new software tools are helping harness providers solve some of these critical problems.
Design flow issues and impact
The high-level flow shown below describes the inputs into the harness design process, which is normally undertaken by the harness supplier.

Four types of input data (at left of diagram) are merged within a harness design software application:
These inputs are brought together electronically, and the design is then enriched and validated using a combination of manual and automated processes. Examples of design enrichment include component selection and adjustments to facilitate low cost manufacturing.
Once the design is complete, a set of outputs is produced (at right of diagram above), such as harness prints, cost analyses, and data feeds to downstream processes (ERP systems, for example). Of course many facets of this process can be scrutinized and areas for improvement identified.
Next: Pitfalls



