Design Article
Electronic Control for One-cylinder Engines
Ralph C.J. Ferrara
10/26/2009 8:46 AM EDT
INTRODUCTION
Two recent events have emerged that are causing small engine manufacturers to consider replacing their traditional mechanical engine controls with newer, more effective electronic controls.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
The high levels of pollution in urban areas and the growing significance of "greenhouse effect" causing gas emissions from two wheel vehicles and other small engine driven products is forcing many governments to enact stricter emission regulations. These new regulations are starting to specifically target small internal combustion engines. In order to satisfy the new exhaust emission levels contained in these regulations, the manufacturers will need to replace traditional mechanical engine controls with electronic controls, but the strict target costs and size requirements for small engine control systems will require manufacturers to seek innovative design solutions to implement these electronic controls.
FUEL EFFICIENCY
The cost of a gallon of gasoline has risen from 20 cents in 1956 to a recent high point of almost 4 dollars. Instability, in the crude oil producing regions of the world, is being blamed for the price volatility of this essential commodity. The supply of crude oil, once thought to be limitless, is predicted by the oil companies, to be running out. To extend the life of this fuel supply and to reduce engine operating costs means that all engines, large or small, will need to be designed to become more fuel efficient.
2 OR 4 STROKE ENGINES
One of the primary differences between certain small engines and their larger counterparts is the number of "strokes" or times the piston travels up or down in the cylinder to complete one cycle. While it is beyond the scope of this article to discuss the various good and bad points of both kinds of engine, suffice it to say that most existing low-cost, fuel and oil burning, 2 stroke engines will have to be radically redesigned to meet the requirements contained in this new emission legislation.
MECHANICAL CONTROLS
In the traditional internal combustion engine, invented in 1876 by Nicholas Otto, the operation is dependent upon three elements: air, fuel and combustion. In the cylinder of the engine, a precisely timed spark ignites an air/fuel mixture resulting in the combustion that pushes the piston, within the cylinder, down, causing the engine crankshaft to turn. The mechanical control system in a small internal combustion engine consists of two mechanical parts and one electrical part. The first mechanical part, the carburetor, uses the vacuum created in the cylinder, as the engine is initially cranked via the starter motor, pull cord or kick starter, to draw in and atomize the fuel and mix it in the correct proportion with air. This fuel/air mixture is drawn into the cylinder, at the proper time, through the second mechanical part, the intake valve.




Comments
MikeDuvall
11/4/2009 9:26 AM EST
My first thought is this is going to be a lot less reliable than what it replaces. More electronics in and exposed environment means more failures. Also as you increase the cost of the electronics you increase the likeyhood the customer will just throw the device away. I have a leaf blower with a bad ignition module. When it runs out of gas I must wait for it cool off to almost stone cold before I can restart it. once it cools off it starts on the first pull. The ignition module cost about $45. I bought a brand new unit with all new attacments for $99 on sale.
Sign in to Reply
mark_w
11/4/2009 1:15 PM EST
Weight and cost seem like legitimate concerns, but automotive electronics can be made pretty reliable. When they aren't, it is usually because specification, design, testing or manufacture have been inadequate.
Now whether the manufacturers of leaf blowers can reach the same level of sophistication in this regard as auto suppliers is an open question...
Sign in to Reply
Lloyd P
11/4/2009 10:39 PM EST
I recently retired from a company that developed a line of electronic controllers for small engine applications about 15 years ago. The project was way far ahead of it's time and failed miserably.
The writer glosses over the fact that most small engine applications, except for riding mowers and small tractors, have no electrical system, other than the magneto to generate spark. A battery and charging system will also be required to successfully integrate electronics into small engine applications.
Sign in to Reply
Jeff_Mo
11/4/2009 10:53 PM EST
The 'battery' power source in Fig 1 just ain't gonna happen for the small pull-start market, but users might be OK with multiple starter pulls allowing the flywheel alternator to juice up a supercap.
JS
Sign in to Reply
Natrajaprabhu
11/18/2009 7:51 AM EST
I have no idea
Sign in to Reply
DJanes
12/9/2009 9:26 AM EST
I thinkthe author's assumption is that legislation will mandate these changes, therefore the electrical system will come. The author's company, Freescale, is a semiconductor company. Thus the focus on the electronic components, and "glossing over" the electrical system.
I agree with mark_w that automotive electronics have made great strides in reliability, particularly over the last 4 years. Semiconductors have played a major role in the reliability improvements, and automotive semiconductor companies can do a lot to help small engine manufacturers with reliability.
Sign in to Reply