Design Article
Ethernet tackles automotive EMI challenge
By Mike Jones, Micrel
1/2/2013 5:23 PM EST
Real-time performance
Solutions based on interoperable standard Ethernet provide a simple, inexpensive route for Ethernet semiconductor manufacturers to offer low emission solutions based on their existing 100Base-TX technology. Any non-Ethernet PHY approach echoes the criticism directed towards MOST technology and the increasing preference towards Ethernet based solutions.
Real-time performance with Ethernet is relatively straightforward with the necessary quality of service (QoS) guaranteed by use of IEEE Audio Video Bridging (AVB) specifications. The AV Bridging system is based on three specifications:
Micrel recently introduced the new EtherSynch™ family of highly integrated Ethernet devices, supporting both IEEE 1588v2 and IEEE 802.1as time synchronization protocols. Timing accuracy in the order of sub 100ns can be comfortably achieved; outperforming the IEEE based standards (1us), enabling suitability for control application as well as A/V streaming. The family of PTP devices is offered in the form of a 3-Port switch with MII or RMII, 2-Port and Single-Port Controllers with 8/16-bit host processor interface. All devices feature embedded ultra low power PHY transceivers, time precision GPIO in a compact 10mm x 10mm 64-LQFP package.
IEEE 802.1Qat Stream Reservation allows network bandwidth and buffer resources to be reserved for specific traffic schemes using SRP (Stream Reservation Protocol). IEEE 802.1Qav Queuing and Forwarding methods are based on segregating traffic into isochronous (time critical) and asynchronous (non-time critical) packets and prioritising using the priority class defined in IEEE 802.1p. Egress port buffers are then separated into two or more queues, each allocated to a specific priority class. Isochronous packets will be given the highest priority, while asynchronous packet the lowest. A credit based traffic shaper is defined to smooth the ‘bursty’ nature of video data.
Conclusion
If Ethernet is going to be adapted as a true automotive network bus, then automotive makers will demand a commonly agreed solution that is open and freely accessible. Talk to industrial control manufacturers and they will certainly agree, based on their experiences with original multiple, non-interoperable field bus standards, now which are based on Ethernet. Progress is already underway for next generation vehicle networks with the formation of a new IEEE 802.3 Gigabit Ethernet Study Group for Automotive.
Ethernet’s unquestionable success in the Industrial networking sector has proven reliability and quality in an extreme environment. This marriage of this industrial strength and consumer technology drive provides the perfect physical layer solution for automotive, successfully bridging the gap between lengthy vehicle design cycles and today’s fast moving IP world.
Today, Ethernet has already emerged inside the car to provide an IP-based standard interface for diagnostics and software downloading. The next step is for Ethernet to form the backbone of the next generation automotive multi-media networks, carrying ‘live’ traffic. New standards such as IEEE 802.3AVB (Audi-Video Bridging) provide necessary real-time performance, while multiple suppliers already offer proven low EMI emission Ethernet, interoperable both with each other and any other IEEE 802.3 Ethernet PHY.
There is nothing complex about Ethernet technology overall; it is simple, proven and open — the reason for its success. Cost is a crucial factor in any market and Ethernet has consistently demonstrated the lowest cost of ownership of any network.
About the author: Mike Jones is Senior Marketing Manager for Micrel Inc. Mr. Jones has more than 20 years high tech design experience in the semiconductor industry. He is currently based in Newbury, U.K., where he is responsible for Micrel Semiconductor Ltd’s European applications for High Speed Networking and Ethernet solutions. Prior to coming to Micrel, Mr. Jones worked for several high tech companies, in various engineering roles, including as a development engineer at BT and Fujitsu Telecommunications where he gained more than a decade in design experience in SONET, SDH and PDH systems. He was a senior FAE with Micrel for ten years prior to his current position.
Solutions based on interoperable standard Ethernet provide a simple, inexpensive route for Ethernet semiconductor manufacturers to offer low emission solutions based on their existing 100Base-TX technology. Any non-Ethernet PHY approach echoes the criticism directed towards MOST technology and the increasing preference towards Ethernet based solutions.
Real-time performance with Ethernet is relatively straightforward with the necessary quality of service (QoS) guaranteed by use of IEEE Audio Video Bridging (AVB) specifications. The AV Bridging system is based on three specifications:
- IEEE 802.1as Time Synchronization
- IEEE 802.1Qat Stream Reservation
- IEEE 802.1Qav Queuing & Forwarding for AV Bridges
Micrel recently introduced the new EtherSynch™ family of highly integrated Ethernet devices, supporting both IEEE 1588v2 and IEEE 802.1as time synchronization protocols. Timing accuracy in the order of sub 100ns can be comfortably achieved; outperforming the IEEE based standards (1us), enabling suitability for control application as well as A/V streaming. The family of PTP devices is offered in the form of a 3-Port switch with MII or RMII, 2-Port and Single-Port Controllers with 8/16-bit host processor interface. All devices feature embedded ultra low power PHY transceivers, time precision GPIO in a compact 10mm x 10mm 64-LQFP package.
IEEE 802.1Qat Stream Reservation allows network bandwidth and buffer resources to be reserved for specific traffic schemes using SRP (Stream Reservation Protocol). IEEE 802.1Qav Queuing and Forwarding methods are based on segregating traffic into isochronous (time critical) and asynchronous (non-time critical) packets and prioritising using the priority class defined in IEEE 802.1p. Egress port buffers are then separated into two or more queues, each allocated to a specific priority class. Isochronous packets will be given the highest priority, while asynchronous packet the lowest. A credit based traffic shaper is defined to smooth the ‘bursty’ nature of video data.
Conclusion
If Ethernet is going to be adapted as a true automotive network bus, then automotive makers will demand a commonly agreed solution that is open and freely accessible. Talk to industrial control manufacturers and they will certainly agree, based on their experiences with original multiple, non-interoperable field bus standards, now which are based on Ethernet. Progress is already underway for next generation vehicle networks with the formation of a new IEEE 802.3 Gigabit Ethernet Study Group for Automotive.
Ethernet’s unquestionable success in the Industrial networking sector has proven reliability and quality in an extreme environment. This marriage of this industrial strength and consumer technology drive provides the perfect physical layer solution for automotive, successfully bridging the gap between lengthy vehicle design cycles and today’s fast moving IP world.
Today, Ethernet has already emerged inside the car to provide an IP-based standard interface for diagnostics and software downloading. The next step is for Ethernet to form the backbone of the next generation automotive multi-media networks, carrying ‘live’ traffic. New standards such as IEEE 802.3AVB (Audi-Video Bridging) provide necessary real-time performance, while multiple suppliers already offer proven low EMI emission Ethernet, interoperable both with each other and any other IEEE 802.3 Ethernet PHY.
There is nothing complex about Ethernet technology overall; it is simple, proven and open — the reason for its success. Cost is a crucial factor in any market and Ethernet has consistently demonstrated the lowest cost of ownership of any network.

About the author: Mike Jones is Senior Marketing Manager for Micrel Inc. Mr. Jones has more than 20 years high tech design experience in the semiconductor industry. He is currently based in Newbury, U.K., where he is responsible for Micrel Semiconductor Ltd’s European applications for High Speed Networking and Ethernet solutions. Prior to coming to Micrel, Mr. Jones worked for several high tech companies, in various engineering roles, including as a development engineer at BT and Fujitsu Telecommunications where he gained more than a decade in design experience in SONET, SDH and PDH systems. He was a senior FAE with Micrel for ten years prior to his current position.
Navigate to related information


Snick
1/9/2013 6:22 PM EST
10 Jan. 08:22 Japan time
Your link to the second page here is broken.
Sign in to Reply
jpmcwil
1/16/2013 5:17 PM EST
I’ve been seeing more and more stuff about this lately. Just to put it out there- I think ethernet in the car is mostly a bad idea. The exception, where Ethernet in a vehicle might make sense, is as a communications interface to an on-vehicle diagnostic or programming gateway. This could help avoid needing a myriad of different service tools and special hardware interfaces to talk to various cars, or to the various systems on a single car.
Yes, Unshielded Twisted Pair is fairly cheap, but the added MIPS and software required to support Ethernet protocol isn't going to come for free in auto silicon anytime soon. And BTW, OPEN isn't the only thing that can run on UTP or even other lower cost wiring options.
Sure, everybody thinks Ethernet is great because of its ubiquity in home and business networks, but vehicles have very different requirements and needs than those applications. Sure, vehicles are getting a lot of technology, but they're still not a home office or media center, where a high level of interchangeability is required, and everything probably needs to talk to everything else.
Sign in to Reply
jpmcwil
1/16/2013 5:17 PM EST
What’s more, isn't the implementation of One-Pair-EtherNet (OPEN) basically a proprietary point-to-point physical layer, with a big 'ol bloated Ethernet protocol stack on top of it? There are a number of other efficient, vehicle–oriented P2P communication interfaces available, with HIGHER bandwidth, requiring much less overhead than is necessary to support “Ethernet.” I don’t think it will be practical to try connecting everything in a car together by “OPEN Ethernet” to the exclusion of such other reliable and inexpensive communications interfaces and proprietary protocols.
There’s a lot of marketing hype over “ethernet in vehicles,” I just hope the vehicle OEMs don’t get sucked into it. Although acceptance may line the pockets of the OPEN Ethernet SIG, it doesn’t buy anybody else anything not already available more cheaply and efficiently in other ways.
Sorry for the rant, at least in this article I didn't see anything about trying to use RJ-45 connectors, too. Where, in a vehicle, would an RJ-45 ever be suitable as a reliable, long term interconnect?!? lol.
Sign in to Reply