Design Article
Tell us What You Think
We want to know what you thought about this Design. Let us know by adding a comment.
Power noise reduction by optimizing the dynamic power signature of digital ICs
Tobias Bjerregaard
7/30/2012 11:33 AM EDT
Analyzing the package chip model
Package-level dynamic voltage drop is often dominated by L-noise, as indicated by v = L di/dt. This means that reducing current demand peaks is not enough to handle PNI challenges. Transient current slopes (di/dt) must also be effectively dealt with. High frequency power noise must be decreased. Not surprisingly, it is seen in Figures 2 and 3 how the voltage drop across the package constitutes a higher degree of the total dynamic voltage drop (peak drop) in a high-inductance package compared to a low-inductance package. It is also seen how the on-chip part of the voltage drop is somewhat smaller in the high-inductance package. This is due to the high package inductance filtering the high frequency content of the power noise, thus not exposing the on-chip resistive network to this.

Figure 2: high-inductance (100 pH), low-decap (0.8 nF) implementation.
Figures
3 and 4 compare a design in a low-inductance package with a low (0.8
nF) and high (1.4 nF) level of on-chip decap respectively. It is seen
how the added decap reduces the dynamic voltage drop peak as expected.
An interesting observation is that in order to achieve an acceptable
peak level of less than 15% dynamic voltage drop, a full 1.4 nF of decap
is required in the non-power shaped version of the design. To reach
that same level in the power shape optimized version of the same design,
only 0.8 nF of total decap (43% less) is required. Much of this decap
is intrinsically present in non-switching logic cells, and the
percentage reduction in explicitly added decap is an even higher number.
As such, when applying power shape optimization it is possible to make
do with significantly less decap, within a given power noise budget.

Figure 3: low-inductance (20 pH), low-decap (0.8 nF) implementation.

Figure 4: low-inductance (20 pH), high-decap (1.4 nF) implementation.
Another
observation is that the high frequency content of the power noise, seen
clearly in both Figures 3 and 4 as the sharp voltage drop spikes across
the package, is effectively eliminated by power shaping. High frequency
power noise is an indication that logic cells are being starved of
their immediate power requirement. The high-frequency content of the
power demand is often difficult to accommodate due to the inductive
power tracing, e.g. in the package. To make things worse, the
effectiveness of on-chip decaps drops in the high frequency range, due
to the series resistance of the decap device. Decaps further more work
best locally due to resistance in the on-chip power grid. Their
effectiveness, especially in the high-frequency range, drops with the
distance to the source of the current demand. Finally, the effectiveness
of decaps decreases considerably with scaling process nodes, as the
intrinsic capacitance is going down, while the effective series
resistance is going up [2].
The benefit of power shaping on the high-frequency content of the voltage drop is also seen by looking at the slopes of the voltage waveforms. The RC-network of the on-chip PDN works as a low-pass filter, smoothing the slopes. Power shaping is fully complementary to the passive filtering effect of the on-chip PDN. It simply reduces the high-frequency content of the noise instigator, the current demand of the cells. It is seen in all Figures 2 to 4 how power shaping has a significant effect on the slopes, on top of the low-pass effect of the decaps.
In conclusion of these observations, it is clear that the biggest hurdle to achieving PNI at advanced process nodes lies in handling high frequency power demand. To address high-frequency PNI challenges, you need to work very closely to the source of the dynamic power drain: directly on the chip. A power shaping approach which changes the power noise profile of a design by optimizing the current demand waveform, Icell of Figure 1, works orthogonally to approaches directed at PDN implementation itself, the R’s, C’s and L’s of Figure 1. Power shaping works particularly well in the high-frequency range, where traditional physical-level approaches are at a lack [3].
Dynamic Power Shaping, as enabled by Teklatech’s FloorDirector tool, constitutes a viable path towards PNI optimization in advanced SoC designs. It works complementary to existing PDN optimization techniques. It provides a solution to high-frequency power noise challenges that cannot be addressed effectively today, challenges which are increasingly problematic at scaling technology nodes.
References
[1] Ludovic Larzul, "Power-aware emulation tests power islands", EE Times, 2012.
[2] Aveek Sarkar, “Power delivery network design requires chip-package-system co-design approach”, EE Times, 2010.
[3] Fabio Campi, Davide Pandini, Tobias Bjerregaard, Mikkel Stensgaard, “A Power Shaping Methodology for Supply Noise and EMI Reduction”, Design Automation Conference User Track, 2010.
About the author
Tobias
Bjerregaard is CEO and Founder of Teklatech. He has spent more than a
decade with a focus on leading-edge micro-electronics, both in an
industrial, commercial, and research capacity. He has invented and
patented semiconductor technology innovations in the areas of power
integrity, clock distribution, and on-chip communication networks.
Through his leadership, Teklatech has developed and commercialized
multiple generations of ground-breaking power and noise integrity
optimization EDA technologies. Dr. Bjerregaard has received numerous
prestigious accolades for his individual achievements, has written a
range of papers for leading industry publications and has worldwide
recognition for his work. He holds MS.EE. and Ph.D. degrees in
micro-electronics, from the Technical University of Denmark.
If you found this article to be of interest, visit EDA Designline where you will find the latest and greatest design, technology, product, and news articles with regard to all aspects of Electronic Design Automation (EDA).
Also, you can obtain a highlights update delivered directly to your inbox by signing up for the EDA Designline weekly newsletter – just Click Here to request this newsletter using the Manage Newsletters tab (if you aren't already a member you'll be asked to register, but it's free and painless so don't let that stop you).
Package-level dynamic voltage drop is often dominated by L-noise, as indicated by v = L di/dt. This means that reducing current demand peaks is not enough to handle PNI challenges. Transient current slopes (di/dt) must also be effectively dealt with. High frequency power noise must be decreased. Not surprisingly, it is seen in Figures 2 and 3 how the voltage drop across the package constitutes a higher degree of the total dynamic voltage drop (peak drop) in a high-inductance package compared to a low-inductance package. It is also seen how the on-chip part of the voltage drop is somewhat smaller in the high-inductance package. This is due to the high package inductance filtering the high frequency content of the power noise, thus not exposing the on-chip resistive network to this.

Figure 2: high-inductance (100 pH), low-decap (0.8 nF) implementation.

Figure 3: low-inductance (20 pH), low-decap (0.8 nF) implementation.

Figure 4: low-inductance (20 pH), high-decap (1.4 nF) implementation.
The benefit of power shaping on the high-frequency content of the voltage drop is also seen by looking at the slopes of the voltage waveforms. The RC-network of the on-chip PDN works as a low-pass filter, smoothing the slopes. Power shaping is fully complementary to the passive filtering effect of the on-chip PDN. It simply reduces the high-frequency content of the noise instigator, the current demand of the cells. It is seen in all Figures 2 to 4 how power shaping has a significant effect on the slopes, on top of the low-pass effect of the decaps.
In conclusion of these observations, it is clear that the biggest hurdle to achieving PNI at advanced process nodes lies in handling high frequency power demand. To address high-frequency PNI challenges, you need to work very closely to the source of the dynamic power drain: directly on the chip. A power shaping approach which changes the power noise profile of a design by optimizing the current demand waveform, Icell of Figure 1, works orthogonally to approaches directed at PDN implementation itself, the R’s, C’s and L’s of Figure 1. Power shaping works particularly well in the high-frequency range, where traditional physical-level approaches are at a lack [3].
Dynamic Power Shaping, as enabled by Teklatech’s FloorDirector tool, constitutes a viable path towards PNI optimization in advanced SoC designs. It works complementary to existing PDN optimization techniques. It provides a solution to high-frequency power noise challenges that cannot be addressed effectively today, challenges which are increasingly problematic at scaling technology nodes.
References
[1] Ludovic Larzul, "Power-aware emulation tests power islands", EE Times, 2012.
[2] Aveek Sarkar, “Power delivery network design requires chip-package-system co-design approach”, EE Times, 2010.
[3] Fabio Campi, Davide Pandini, Tobias Bjerregaard, Mikkel Stensgaard, “A Power Shaping Methodology for Supply Noise and EMI Reduction”, Design Automation Conference User Track, 2010.
About the author
Tobias
Bjerregaard is CEO and Founder of Teklatech. He has spent more than a
decade with a focus on leading-edge micro-electronics, both in an
industrial, commercial, and research capacity. He has invented and
patented semiconductor technology innovations in the areas of power
integrity, clock distribution, and on-chip communication networks.
Through his leadership, Teklatech has developed and commercialized
multiple generations of ground-breaking power and noise integrity
optimization EDA technologies. Dr. Bjerregaard has received numerous
prestigious accolades for his individual achievements, has written a
range of papers for leading industry publications and has worldwide
recognition for his work. He holds MS.EE. and Ph.D. degrees in
micro-electronics, from the Technical University of Denmark.If you found this article to be of interest, visit EDA Designline where you will find the latest and greatest design, technology, product, and news articles with regard to all aspects of Electronic Design Automation (EDA).
Also, you can obtain a highlights update delivered directly to your inbox by signing up for the EDA Designline weekly newsletter – just Click Here to request this newsletter using the Manage Newsletters tab (if you aren't already a member you'll be asked to register, but it's free and painless so don't let that stop you).
Navigate to related information

