Design Article

IP video surveillance standards

Peter Kuciak<br> Vice President of Research and Development,<br>March Networks

2/20/2009 3:00 AM EST

Standards have played virtually no role in IP video security until very recently, but that is quickly changing. At widely varying paces, enterprises are shifting from proprietary, analog video systems to open, IP solutions -- and with that market shift, they are creating an intensified drive for standards.

This shift to IP coupled with the introduction of video content analysis or video analytics promises to extend the reach of video beyond security and into the enterprise to provide a rich source of data for business optimization.

Standards promote interoperability and reduce integration cost. Unfortunately, the video surveillance industry has been slow to adopt standards. With the introduction of feature-rich IP cameras and encoders, which offer higher resolutions and embedded analytic capabilities, customers have benefited from an increased choice of devices and capabilities. A lack of standards, however, has kept some of these devices out of reach. In addition to limiting customer choice, this standards deficiency increases integration costs for solution providers and manufacturers.

More importantly, it results in opportunity costs that lead to reduced innovation as Video Management System (VMS) vendors waste research and development dollars on integration activity instead of focusing efforts on new functionality.

The good news is that the video security industry is finally responding and a few attempts at standardization are underway. One such effort is the Physical Security Interoperability Alliance (PSIA), a group of leading physical security industry and IT manufacturers, system integrators and distributors that has come together to promote the interoperability of IP-enabled security devices, and is currently focused on several initiatives. This article will focus on the standards requirements for adding, configuring and managing IP cameras and encoders, hereafter referred to simply as an IP media device or IP camera.

Next: The move to IP video


Next:




paulyvee

6/26/2009 8:43 AM EDT

The current financial climate must have a considerable bearing on the introduction of inter - operability
"Why should I spend money on R & D to develop new systems when my present ones are selling as systems to new customers and because of their lack of standards are essential to the current market to integrate with their present kit."
While the present world-wide depression continues there is not the money available to see more than the introduction - these new standards are likely to only be taken up by the larger manufacturers who will then as a result of having soent money they must recoup would be in danger of no longer being cost effective compared with those who don't bother or who can not afford development. The new kit will inevitably require a learning curve by the installers - who may not be interested or qualified to start installing networking systems alongside existing.

Sign in to Reply



Theckyam

9/17/2009 4:09 AM EDT

Hi Peter, I would just like to point out one such consortium:
http://www.onvif.org/
I hope this consortium comes out addressing all the points of interop requirements that you have elaborated.
Overall, gives a good overview of today's requirements.

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)

Feedback Form