Design Article

Comment


Gobi.C

9/17/2010 11:57 PM EDT

As a good practice every one can make sure all the wall adapters like TVs, Audio ...

More...



ecotec

8/29/2010 5:28 PM EDT

Good article......I totally agree that designing for low standby is really down ...

More...

Don’t ignore zero standby for effective power reduction

Doug Bailey

8/10/2010 5:00 PM EDT

An important trend in power management, often overlooked, is standby power minimization in consumer products, appliances, portable electronics and computer systems. It may be thought that the standby power consumption of electronic equipment is trivial compared with active power consumption.

However, this is far from the truth. Several studies have shown the total energy consumed by electronic equipment and their power adapters while in standby or under no-load is very significant.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, the total amount of electricity that flows through internal power supplies and external power adapters is nearly 470 billion kWh per year. In the typical household, electricity consumption derives from a large number of appliances, each with its own power supply (e.g. TVs, computers, video players, cellphones etc.).

Most appliances are left permanently plugged into the mains and spend a large proportion of the day on standby or, in the case of cellphone chargers, left plugged into the mains while the phone is elsewhere.

The Lawrence Berkeley National Lab estimates that the waste in electricity resulting from standby and no-load consumption costs U.S. households over $5 billion each year; 5 to 15% of household electricity consumption worldwide is wasted in standby mode (International Energy Agency).

There are clearly enormous benefits to be gained by reducing this waste to as close to zero as possible. Regulatory authorities around the world have not been idle in this respect, and standards have been and continue to be progressively tightened. As an example, for TV receivers many programs including Energy Star and EU Eco-Label now mandate a maximum standby consumption of 1W.

However, it is not the regulatory authorities that are leading the pace. In many brand name consumer product companies, managers are taking a serious view of global energy consumption. Many are demanding power consumption characteristics significantly better than the government- mandated specifications require.

For example, several major OEMs producing TVs and monitors have set a de-facto standard of 100mW maximum standby consumption—10 times lower than the national requirement.

Following a study by Nokia, which found that up to two-thirds of energy consumed by cellphones was wasted by chargers left plugged in, the world’s top cellphone manufacturers (Nokia, Samsung, Sony Ericsson, Motorola and LG Electronics) and the European Commission Integrated Policy Program produced a star rating system for chargers (Table 1 below).

Table 1: Star rating system for cellphone chargers were introduced in November 2008.

You would be forgiven for taking the view that OEMs may be cynically exploiting green issues to gain a marketing advantage. But these OEMs seem to make little or no mention of this in their product promotion. They focus instead on the more traditional user features and the value of their products.

The issues of ultra-low standby consumption are something worked on quietly between their developers and the suppliers of power supply components. One should conclude there is a genuine commitment to drive down energy consumption within the electronics industry and certainly among the major OEMs.

They are making the change because it is the right thing to do. It also helps that reducing standby power is really a matter of careful design and appropriate power IC choice. It costs little more than the will to change and an innovative attitude to have green standby performance.

Energy efficiency measures do make a difference. Dr. Arthur Rosenfeld, now retired, was a long-serving Commissioner to the California Energy Commission and a tireless campaigner for of energy efficiency. California’s low electricity per capita growth since 1973 (Figure 1, below) has been largely credited to him and has been dubbed the Rosenfeld Effect. The Rosenfeld Effect is the empirical fact that electricity use per capita in California has been almost flat from 1973 to 2006, whereas use in the U.S. has gone up 50 percent.

Figure 1: Energy efficiency measures do make a difference (Source: California Energy Commission 2007). [To view larger image, click here]

Achieving ultra-low standby or no-load consumption is not a trivial task, and considerable attention to detail is required. Losses in EMI circuits, decisions related to startup time, transient response, and other design trade-offs mean that care must be taken in external component choices, not just the IC.

The ultimate in standby power consumption is of course zero. We are now seeing products announced that achieve this. VoltStar Technologies Inc. of Illinois produces a charger for cellphones and other portable devices that switches to zero consumption when charging is complete.

AT&T has announced a similar product, the ZERO Charger. The challenge now is to achieve near-zero standby consumption for all electronic systems, not just chargers, without any cost penalty or compromise in user convenience, to take the ultimate step in standby power.

(Doug Bailey is vice president of marketing at Power Integrations, Inc.)

 





Frank Eory

8/23/2010 6:47 PM EDT

Great article! It is interesting to me to see the different viewpoints about standby power from engineers who design ICs for battery-powered devices vs. those who design ICs for plug-in-the-wall devices. When your product runs on a battery, you sweat over every microamp of standby current, but if your product plugs into the AC mains, extra microamps or milliamps don't seem like such a big deal -- until you look at the macro scale of millions of users.

The Nokia study is quite revealing -- 2/3 of all power used by cellphones is wasted in the chargers that are left plugged into the AC mains? That should be deemed unacceptable by even the most un-green consumers among us!

Sign in to Reply



ecotec

8/29/2010 5:28 PM EDT

Good article......I totally agree that designing for low standby is really down to attention to detail.

It is possible to design a **** universal standby switch which informs the user how much energy is being saved. So all legacy products can have 0.1W standby, but, at least in the UK, the market is mainly controlled by the Energy Providers who have no incentive to insist on a higher specification.

I hope the phone charger situation will self resolve fairly quickly........Most people upgrade their phones regularly and then they will get the newer 4* chargers. The emphasis should be on the products and appliances that don't get changed for years.......Like Microwave Ovens, Washing Machines, PCs and TVs. The standby power on a microwave oven can be as high as 32W!.........at least it is if you wander off and leave the door open and the light on.

Many products have no indication that they are using energy at all, so how the users are supposed to know is a mystery.

Instead of 5 - 15% standby usage it should be 1 -2%

Sign in to Reply



Gobi.C

9/17/2010 11:57 PM EDT

As a good practice every one can make sure all the wall adapters like TVs, Audio systems, cell phone chargers etc.. are switched off before you leave out of home. We can also save our electric bill until the new low power standby devices are enforced

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)

Feedback Form