datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

Design Article

Comment


MeirG

4/2/2013 5:48 AM EDT

Does anybody remember an old and by now gone mini-computer company by the name ...

More...



Hany Salama

10/27/2011 7:26 AM EDT

I will be grateful if you could give me more Information on my e-mail:
More...

What is Power Line Communication?

Cypress Semiconductor

8/17/2011 10:42 AM EDT

Power Line Communication (PLC) is a communication technology that enables sending data over existing power cables. This means that, with just power cables running to an electronic device (for example) one can both power it up and at the same time control/retrieve data from it in a half-duplex manner.

 

PLC Market: Overview

 

Segments

For the purpose of understanding, PLC can be broadly viewed as:

 

1. Narrowband PLC

2. Broadband PLC

 

Narrowband PLC works at lower frequencies (3-500 kHz), lower data rates (up to 100s of kbps), and has longer range (up to several kilometers), which can be extended using repeaters. Broadband PLC works at higher frequencies (1.8-250 MHz), high data rates (up to 100s of Mbps) and is used in shorter-range applications.

 

Recently, narrowband Power Line Communication has been receiving widespread attention due to its applications in the Smart Grid. Another application that narrowband PLC has been used in is smart energy generation, particularly in micro-inverters for solar panels.

 

Broadband PLC, in contrast, has mainly found acceptance as a last-mile solution for Internet distribution and home networking. With its high data rates and no additional wiring, broadband PLC is seen as an exciting and effective technology for multimedia distribution within homes. This optimism in the market is reflected by the recent acquisitions of Intellon by Atheros, Coppergate by Sigma, DS2 by Marvell, and Gigle by Broadcom, all in the Home Area Networking (HAN) segment.

 

There is another way to classify Power Line Communication and that is:

 

1. PLC over AC lines

2. PLC over DC lines

 

While most companies are currently geared towards providing AC-PLC solutions, PLC in DC lines also has applications. Two such applications are PLC over the DC-bus in distributed energy generation, and PLC in transportation (electronic controls in airplanes, automobiles and trains). This use reduces wiring complexity, weight, and ultimately cost of communications inside vehicles. However, in this article, we will be dealing mostly with narrowband PLC over AC lines.

 

Competition

The narrowband PLC market is seeing healthy competition, with a large number of PLC suppliers joining the fray, including:

 

1.  Cypress Semiconductor

2.  Echelon

3.  ST Microelectronics

4.  Yitran

5.  Texas Instruments

6.  Maxim

7.  Semitech Semiconductor

8.  Ariane Controls

9.  ADD Semiconductor

10.  Microchip

 

Companies in the broadband PLC segment include:

1.  Atheros

2.  Sigma

3.  Marvell

4.  Broadcom

5.  Lantiq

6.  Maxim

7.  Plugtek

 

PLC Technology: How does it work?

PLC is like any other communication technology whereby a sender modulates the data to be sent, injects it onto medium, and the receiver de-modulates the data to read it. The major difference is that PLC does not need extra cabling, it re-uses existing wiring. Considering the pervasiveness of power lines, this means with PLC, virtually all line- powered devices can be controlled or monitored!

 

When discussing communication technology, it is often useful to refer to the 7-layer OSI model. Some PLC chips can implement only the Physical Layer of the OSI model, while others integrate all seven layers. One could use a Digital Signal Processor (DSP) with a pure software realization of the MAC and an external PHY circuit, or an optimized System-on-Chip (SoC) solution, which includes the complete PLC – MAC and PHY. The Cypress CY8CPLCXX series is an example of the latter, with a ready-to-use Physical and Network layer, and a user-programmable application layer. Before moving on to the applications of PLC, let’s first understand the various aspects of the Physical layer by viewing it as three segments on the basis of data rate.

 

Modulation Schemes

A variety of modulation schemes can be used in PLC. Some of these are Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM), Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK), Frequency Shift Keying (FSK), Spread-FSK (S-FSK) and proprietary schemes too (for example Differential Code Shift Keying (DCSK) from Yitran). In the table below, BPSK, FSK, SFSK and OFDM are compared on the basis of two important criteria – bandwidth efficiency and complexity (cost).

OFDM in particular offers high data rates, but requires computational horsepower to churn out Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT) and Inverse-FFT (IFFT), as required by the scheme. On the other hand, BPSK, FSK are robust and simple but offer lower data rates. The current trend is to move towards OFDM with PSK modulation (G3 and probably P1901.2). Such heavy computation will require DSP capability, whereas FSK, PSK and SFSK can be accomplished by a microcontroller.

 

Standards

Various standards have been developed in order to ensure reliable communications and inter-operability, especially for the smart grid and home networking. Examples of such standards are:

 

These, along with the organizations that govern them like CENELEC, FCC, ARIB, Homeplug Power Alliance specify ranges for operation of PLC. If a worldwide standard for PLC were to be established, this would have a positive impact on adoption of PLC. So far, the G3-PLC standard is touted as the most robust scheme available, and the IEEE 1901.2 working group is committed to developing a universally acceptable standard.

 

Frequencies

Different regions of the world have different frequency bands allocated to narrowband PLC. The table below summarizes the different frequencies available for narrowband PLC communication in the respective region.

Where:

CENELEC - European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization.

ARIB – Association of Radio Industries & Businesses

EPRI – Electric Power Research Institute

FCC – Federal Communications Commission

 

APPLICATIONS

Earlier, we saw that PLC is widely used in the Smart Grid and in micro-inverters. As the market gets familiar with this technology, PLC should see wider adoption in other applications like lighting (e.g. traffic light control, LED dimming), industrial (e.g. UPS communicating to a network device, irrigation control), machine-to-machine (e.g. vending machines, a hotel’s reception-to-room communication), telemetry (e.g. offshore oil rigs), transport (e.g. Electronics in cars, trains and airplanes) and indeed, applications of PLC are only limited by one’s creativity. In this article, we will find out a little more about PLC in energy generation and conservation markets.





prabhakar_deosthali

8/17/2011 1:22 PM EDT

a very good article giving the gist of what PLC can bring in to tomorrows energy conscious world. This technology is really exciting and if used properly can be a win-win for both the consumers and producers of energy.

The word of caution is however about the security of such systems- if hacked can result into disasters because here we are connecting the appliances and power generating devices on a smart grid. It is not just loss of data or loss of privacy and confidential information, it is the appliances which can get burnt, it is the grids that can go out of control - by the actions of those smart hackers.

Sign in to Reply



Bert22306

8/17/2011 3:58 PM EDT

I see at least two problems with the idea of providing broadband service over PLC, that don't seem to have been mentioned.

The first is that the link layer service provided by powerlines would be shared by as many households as feed off any one transformer, no? It's not like you can easily isolate one household from the adjacent few, until you meet a transformer. So the bandwidth is necessarily shared, and presumably each household would have its own security codes to keep its internal network safe. (Not a big deal for low bandwidth functions like control of home lighting, of course.)

The second problem is that emissions from powerlines only attenuate as an inverse of the perpendicular distance from the powerline. Not the more common inverse square of distance, that you'd experience with point sources like WiFi or cellular telephony. So I would think preventing RF interference created by these PLC schemes will be more of a factor.

Sign in to Reply



WA2PYX

8/19/2011 8:29 AM EDT

Bert22306 is entirely correct regarding RFI created by data over pwoer line systems. This has been a ten years plus conflict among licensed spectrum users and the illusion of easy savings and easy money by trying to send data of existing power lines. Most field trials of these systems have shown excess interference, insufficient real bandwidth for users and financial loss for the sstem operators. The narrow band systems are OK for in-home control, but the so-called wide-band systems are so far behind bandwidths users expect (50 Mb/s or more)that building such a system is like saddling a dying horse.

Sign in to Reply



ArieKarpf

8/18/2011 4:48 AM EDT

PLC stands for Programable Logic Controllers for decades in the traditional industries. Now this acronim is taken to create confusion...

Sign in to Reply



oldengr

8/18/2011 1:44 PM EDT

Power line carrier (PLC) has been used for high-voltage power system communications since the 1950's. PLC has also been used in the home (120V/240V systems) for lighting control and security for many years.

Programmable logic controllers, PLC's as they are referred to now, were once called programmable controllers (PC's). The name was changed to avoid confusion with reference to desktop computers.

Also tne word is spelled acronym.

Sign in to Reply



WayneC

8/18/2011 5:09 PM EDT

I'm an advocate for NMA ( No More Acronyms ). Reading technical writings is akin to reading alphabet soup anymore. Gives me a headache...

Sign in to Reply



MeirG

4/2/2013 5:48 AM EDT

Does anybody remember an old and by now gone mini-computer company by the name of "NBI"?

When asked what is the meaning of their name, the answer was "Nothing But Initials"!

Anybody who tried to come up with a really good name for a company might feel a sympathy for that...

Sign in to Reply



RDentonSr

8/18/2011 4:35 PM EDT

Broadband over Power Lines (BPL) has been documented to be a consistent source of radiated RF that interferes with other radio communication services. The FCC has also not enforced its own standards. See http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/New-Docs-Show-FCC-Glossed-Over-BPL-Flaws-102422
Devices sending broadband signals over elevated, unshielded power lines are not the answer to "simple" broadband communications.

Sign in to Reply



RDentonSr

8/18/2011 4:55 PM EDT

Another article published in the EMC community is in http://www.nutwooduk.co.uk/pdf/Issue80.PDF and begins on page 25. This is a technical and regulatorial analysis for BPL in the UK. It highlights the main problems with BPL.

Sign in to Reply



agk

8/19/2011 6:14 AM EDT

By reading the power line communication my mind went back to 1975. In my college days 3rd and 4th years of curriculam a miniproject to be done.One of this was PLC power line communication. That time all analog and i used AM, carrier frequency 150kHz.it worked within a same phase line in side the building. The modulation circuit uses a transistor and twin T filters (notch) rejection frequecy 50 Hz are used to couple the 150kHz signal to the main line.

Sign in to Reply



Frank Eory

8/19/2011 12:08 PM EDT

This seems to have been a popular miniproject among EE professors. I also did something similar in college back in the 80s.

On another note, my own experience years ago with the first crude PLC system, the X10 system, was not good. Limited address selection on the remote modules meant I was sometimes playing tug-of-war with one of my neighbors over which one of us got to control my swimming pool lights.

Sign in to Reply



Robotics Developer

8/19/2011 8:53 AM EDT

I could see a few applications for this like remote control/sensing of street lights/traffic lights and weather conditions in a city. I do wonder about the interference issue and usefulness of broader communications/control using this method. I remember the fad a number of years ago with "smart houses" lots of smoke but no fire. I think there could be some interesting niche applications but I am not sure about general widespread use.

Sign in to Reply



maunix

8/19/2011 11:23 AM EDT

About 5 years ago I had the job to analyze options for Broadband Over Powerlines. The target applications was to provide cheap internet and data access to small towns.
I remember having read a lot of forums and there were a lot of concerns about RF interference (the options used OOFDM) and the inability of Power Lines to shield those RF emissions (as coaxial cables do and even coax cables do have power leakages). Power Lines (mainly made of copper and/or Aluminium) were not designed for such purposes and there were a lot of concerns because there were analysts talking that the noise floor will be increased affecting many existing communications (like public safety servicies; long range airplane communications, etc)
At that time it was a very risky move and the investors decided not to follow that direction. There were implementations but in-house or in-building (in france and spain) but not in the outside. The internet link was a DSL or ISDN and the internal distribution was done using the existing power lines (with about 2Mbps of data rate). Yes it was slow but very suitable for home-automation, building-automation and "intelligent homes".

Sign in to Reply



Hany Salama

10/20/2011 11:30 AM EDT

Our Graduation Project is Intelligent Street Lighting (light on demand).But we are looking for the best communications technique between the nodes is it narrowband PLC or Zigbee ?

Sign in to Reply



Antoniorohit

10/24/2011 2:21 AM EDT

Hey Hany,
Thank you for your interest. Please clarify as to what 'Best' means for you. There are many parameters (bandwidth, overall cost, accessibility, additional functions required) on which to evaluate the system - which is your priority? If you give me some clarity on this, I will be able to answer better. All the best for your project.

Sign in to Reply



Hany Salama

10/27/2011 7:24 AM EDT

We want to connect lighting bulbs together and its lighting will be controlled automatic using sensors or manual using control unit wich monitoring each bulbs, also Faulty bulbs Could be detected using it.

each 30 node well connected together to Gateway (GPRS module)


Thank you very much Mr Antoniorohit.

Sign in to Reply



Hany Salama

10/27/2011 7:26 AM EDT

I will be grateful if you could give me more Information on my e-mail:
hanywarrior@hotmail.com

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)