datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

Design Article

#### Comment

Erik.Anderson_#2

8/24/2012 11:34 AM EDT

Try WITHOUT the period. Not WITH the period. Please try it. thanks.

More...

Zbatt

8/24/2012 11:32 AM EDT

Hi I tried it with the period at the end and it wont work, do you have an ...

More...

# The basics of waterproofing capacitive touchscreens

## 6/6/2012 12:06 PM EDT

Waterproof Touchscreens, Cont'd.

Self-cap works by sensing one sensor’s capacitance to circuit ground.  This is done by applying an excitation signal at one sensor (TX) and sensing the amount of charge or current it takes to fully charge this sensor with a receiver (RX).  There are two possible loops for current to flow in this model:

• Direct coupling from the sensor through the human body (I2).
• Fringe field coupling from the sensor to an adjacent sensor (I1).

For self-cap the dominant source of signal is I2.  This signal is largely governed by the direct capacitive coupling between the finger and sensor (shown as blue field lines in Figure 1).

The direct capacitive coupling can be estimated by the parallel plate capacitor equation C = E0*Er*A/d, where E0 is the permittivity of free space, Er is the relative dielectric of the touchscreen overlay, A is the area covered by the finger, and d is the distance between the finger and the sensor (separated by the touchscreen overlay material).  C1 and C2 in Figure 1 are the capacitances of the mobile device and human body to earth ground, respectively.  These capacitances are normally assumed to be much greater than the direct coupling capacitance; therefore, the series combination of all three capacitances reduces to the direct coupling capacitance.  However, C1 is often small enough to reduce the overall direct capacitive coupling, especially when the mobile device is completely battery powered with no charger connected.

The fringe field signal I1 adds some touch signal during a touch because the finger steals this signal away and diverts it through the human body to ground (adding to I2).  Water that is untouched on the touchscreen has the largest effect on I1 and is the main source of error for capacitive touchscreens.  Water strengthens the fringe field between adjacent sensors and increases capacitance. Depending on the touchscreen overlay thickness and dielectric, this may cause the capacitance to change enough to look like a light finger touch to the sensing circuit and cause false touches.  One solution to this problem is to use a driven shield (sometimes called “guard”).  See Figure 2.

By driving the adjacent sensor with an exact replica of the TX, I1 is eliminated and no capacitance is detected by the sensing circuit.  For this solution to be practical, the touchscreen controller must be able to dynamically switch its sensing pin function from TX, RX and Shield on the fly so that the entire touchscreen can be sensed.  The shield works equally well with traditional CapSense buttons.

Figure 3 provides an alternate graphical view to better understand how I1, I2 and sensed current IRX change with touch, water and shield versus no shield.

Mutual capacitance works by sensing the capacitance between two sensors.  See Figure 4.

TX is applied to one sensor and RX to an adjacent sensor.  The physics for mutual-cap sensing are the exact same as in self-cap, but now the dominant source of finger signal is due to the fringe field instead of direct coupling.  The finger effectively steals charge in the form of current that would normally flow through the fringe field (I1) and diverts it to ground through the human body (I2).  The net effect is a reduction in mutual capacitance between the two sensors.  Water on the touchscreen that is not touched by a finger produces the same behavior as in self-capacitance; it adds capacitive signal by increasing the fringe field strength and increasing current flow to RX.  Figure 5 provides another graphical view of mutual capacitance sensing.

EREBUS

6/6/2012 4:19 PM EDT

I had not really considered the effect of water on a touch screen, but your explanation did a good job of both highlighting the problem and showing the various methods available to mitigate the effect.
I learned something new today. Thank you.

TerryKing

6/7/2012 3:30 AM EDT

Hi, Question about the Marine Small-boat environment:

Do you know of any successful systems or products that will ignore and recover from a significant seawater splash? Has research been done on this?

I'd like to build touch-sensitive dashboard elements for small craft. (The big guys are sitting in a pilot house)..

Regards, Terry King
...On the Mediterranean in Italy
terry@yourduino.com

Erik.Anderson_#2

6/18/2012 11:28 AM EDT

Hi Terry, yes, it is possible to successfully ignore and recover from a large seawater splash. The "thin-film" water case described in the article is meant to cover this condition. I don't know of any off-the-shelf modules available though.

Iceman_VCL

6/27/2012 10:12 AM EDT

Good job, it is useful and really good explained. Cheers!

Erik.Anderson_#2

6/27/2012 10:45 AM EDT

Thanks, I'm glad it was useful to you!

Zbatt

8/24/2012 8:03 AM EDT

Hi, I was wondering if there was an email address to contact you on regarding this topic.The above one doesnt seem to work.

Thanks

Erik.Anderson_#2

8/24/2012 10:46 AM EDT

Hi Zbatt, that e-mail is valid except there is a period (.) at the end of the address. Try again without the period at the end.

Zbatt

8/24/2012 11:32 AM EDT

Hi I tried it with the period at the end and it wont work, do you have an alternative email?

Thanks

Erik.Anderson_#2

8/24/2012 11:34 AM EDT

Try WITHOUT the period. Not WITH the period. Please try it. thanks.