Design Article
Antenna challenges in smartphones and tablets with 4G rising
Paul Tornatta, CTO SkyCross
2/28/2011 11:24 PM EST
An Example
The following example illustrates the benefits of tuning with respect to antenna volumetric size reduction. Two different antenna configurations were analyzed using a 3D electromagnetic modeling program: one a broadband design, and the other, a narrower band design capable of tuning over the same frequency range but using four tuning states.
Figure 3a illustrates a 50 x 6 x 14 mm seven-band antenna configuration and its associated radiation efficiency over just the lower three-band spectral region from 700-960 MHz.

A similar, but smaller (50 x 6 x 7mm) antenna configuration is shown in Figure 3b, illustrating that tuning using only four states can produce nearly the same efficiency and total frequency coverage as the larger broadband antenna.
It is clear from the example in Figures 3a and 3b that a physical volume reduction of one half can be achieved by tuning the antenna to one of several states, each supporting a certain set of frequency bands. The antenna during operation would therefore only be required to change state when the operating band is changed. The time required for this change must be compatible with other functions within the radio system. A typical requirement might be 10-20 microseconds or less.
Mutual Coupling. Mutual coupling effects between adjacent antennas operating at the same frequency at the same time can be mitigated using isolation techniques. The most common technique is to physically separate the antennas from each another. The mutual coupling effect drops as the distance increases. However, for handheld devices, it’s not always possible to find locations to give adequate separation to mitigate the effects of mutual coupling. In this case, device designers need a different antenna solution to achieve the performance required by the specification.
One possible solution is to excite two different modes from the same antenna structure using Isolated Mode Antenna Technology (iMAT®) from SkyCross. The iMAT antenna structure is placed on one end of the phone. Each of the two feed points launches a different radiating mode. The feed points are isolated from each other and do not suffer from the losses normally associated with mutual coupling, so the efficiency of each mode is high. In addition, the radiation patterns are different and produce a low correlation coefficient. Figure 4 illustrates implementation of an iMAT antenna showing the isolation between two feed points on the same antenna structure.

Next: Usage Models
The following example illustrates the benefits of tuning with respect to antenna volumetric size reduction. Two different antenna configurations were analyzed using a 3D electromagnetic modeling program: one a broadband design, and the other, a narrower band design capable of tuning over the same frequency range but using four tuning states.
Figure 3a illustrates a 50 x 6 x 14 mm seven-band antenna configuration and its associated radiation efficiency over just the lower three-band spectral region from 700-960 MHz.

Figure 3 - Comparison of a) multiband antenna and b) tuned antenna with respect to size and radiation efficiency over the region 700- 960 MHz. (Dimensions in mm.)
A similar, but smaller (50 x 6 x 7mm) antenna configuration is shown in Figure 3b, illustrating that tuning using only four states can produce nearly the same efficiency and total frequency coverage as the larger broadband antenna.
It is clear from the example in Figures 3a and 3b that a physical volume reduction of one half can be achieved by tuning the antenna to one of several states, each supporting a certain set of frequency bands. The antenna during operation would therefore only be required to change state when the operating band is changed. The time required for this change must be compatible with other functions within the radio system. A typical requirement might be 10-20 microseconds or less.
Mutual Coupling. Mutual coupling effects between adjacent antennas operating at the same frequency at the same time can be mitigated using isolation techniques. The most common technique is to physically separate the antennas from each another. The mutual coupling effect drops as the distance increases. However, for handheld devices, it’s not always possible to find locations to give adequate separation to mitigate the effects of mutual coupling. In this case, device designers need a different antenna solution to achieve the performance required by the specification.
One possible solution is to excite two different modes from the same antenna structure using Isolated Mode Antenna Technology (iMAT®) from SkyCross. The iMAT antenna structure is placed on one end of the phone. Each of the two feed points launches a different radiating mode. The feed points are isolated from each other and do not suffer from the losses normally associated with mutual coupling, so the efficiency of each mode is high. In addition, the radiation patterns are different and produce a low correlation coefficient. Figure 4 illustrates implementation of an iMAT antenna showing the isolation between two feed points on the same antenna structure.

Figure 4 – iMAT antenna implementation showing isolation between two feed points on the same radiating structure
Next: Usage Models
Navigate to related information


zeeglen
3/1/2011 11:03 AM EST
"[Simply stated, these limitations are: "Bandwidth and antenna size are inversely related" and "efficiency and antenna size are
directly related." This means that in general, a larger antenna will have larger bandwidth and efficiency.]"
This is a bit confusing, if bandwidth is inversely related to antenna size, then a larger antenna would have a smaller bandwidth. The few times I made short antennas the bandwidth decreased as antenna length decreased. Am I missing something?
Otherwise a very interesting and well-written article.
Sign in to Reply
jwc
3/2/2011 10:39 AM EST
Big often relates to narrow band but it doesn't always mean narrow band. For example log-periodic antennas are huge yet they cover enormous bandwidths. I'm sure there are many other examples.
Sign in to Reply
zeeglen
3/3/2011 1:17 AM EST
@JWC Good point. I was considering only single element with length reduction below 1/2 (dipole) and 1/4 (ground plane) wavelength.
Next marketing breakthrough - a log periodic on a cellphone! (Just kidding)
Sign in to Reply
SkyCross CTO
3/1/2011 4:14 PM EST
You are not missing something, you are correct - Bandwidth and size are DIRECTLY related, not inversely related.
Sign in to Reply
zeeglen
3/2/2011 6:41 AM EST
Paul, thank you for clearing this up.
Sign in to Reply
janine.love
3/2/2011 2:21 PM EST
I fixed this in the article above.
Sign in to Reply
sajid.bashir
3/3/2011 2:01 PM EST
I am still confused. AS I know is the antenna size is directly related to wavelength so at higher frequencies we can have smaller antennas. The efficiency is directly related to size as it allows capturing more energy. If this is true then how does bandwith relate to antenna size?
Sign in to Reply
Brakeshoe
3/3/2011 6:32 PM EST
Remember, a modulated RF signal will have sidebands. Let's look at the simplest case of a broadcast AM radio (6A3, double sideband full carrier) signal operating with a carrier frequency f(c) of 600 kHz modulated at 100% with a 4.0 kHz sinusoid. We now have a signal that occupies the spectrum from 596 kHz to 604 kHz, and the Q of the output amp stage as well as the antenna must be low enough to not trim off the sidebands.
Sign in to Reply
Brakeshoe
3/3/2011 6:39 PM EST
Note on second paragraph on second page:
"The coupling magnitude is inversely proportional to the separation distance..."
And is also reduced by the scalar dot product of the angular difference in polarization when linear polarization is used.
Sign in to Reply