datasheets.com EBN.com EDN.com EETimes.com Embedded.com PlanetAnalog.com TechOnline.com  
Events
UBM Tech
UBM Tech

Design Article

Power Tip 42 (Part 1): Discrete devices—a good alternative to integrated MOSFET drivers

Robert Kollman, Texas Instruments

12/9/2011 1:18 PM EST

(Editor's note: to see a linked list of all entries from #1 to the latest one, click here.)

 

     Many times in power-supply design, an engineer is faced with the problem of limited drive current available from his control IC, or too much power being dissipated in it due to gate-drive losses. To mitigate these issues, external drivers are often used. Semiconductor manufacturers (including TI) have ready-made MOSFET-driver solutions in the form of integrated circuits.

     However, this is not usually the most cost-effective approach. Often a few cents worth of discrete components can suffice.

    The schematic in Figure 1 shows an NPN/PNP emitter follower pair, which can be used to buffer the output of a control IC. This potentially increases the controller’s drive capability and moves the drive power dissipation to the external components. Many people believe that this particular circuit will not provide sufficient drive current.

 

Figure 1: A simple buffer can drive more than 2A.

(click here to enlarge.)

 

     As shown in the hfe curves of Figure 2, manufacturers do not typically provide data above 0.5A for these low-current devices. However, the circuit can actually provide substantially more than 0.5A current drive, as shown in the scope waveform in Figure 1.

     For this waveform, the buffer was driven with a 50Ω source and was loaded with a 0.01 µF capacitor connected in series with a 1Ω resistor. The trace shows the voltage across the 1Ω resistor so that the scale on the plot is 2A/division. This figure also shows that the MMBT2222A is capable of sourcing almost 3A and the MMBT3906 could sink 2A.

    In reality, the transistors would be paired with their complements (MMBT3904 for the 3906 and MMBT2907 for the 2222). These two different styles were shown for comparison purposes. Devices are also available with higher-current capability and with higher hfe’s, such as the FMMT618/718 pair which has hfe’s near 100 at 6A (see Figure 2). While not being as elegant as an integrated driver, discretes can deliver a lower-cost solution with improved thermal and current capabilities.

 

Figure 2: Higher-current drivers, like the FMMT618,

can beef up the drive (Top: MMBT3904 / Bottom: FMMT618).

(Click here to enlarge.)

 

     Figure 3 shows a variation to the simple buffer that allows you to cross an isolation boundary. A signal-level transformer is driven with a symmetrically bipolar-drive signal. The secondary of the transformer is used to generate power for the buffer as well as provide the input signal to the buffer. Diodes D1 and D2 rectify the voltage from the transformer, while transistors Q1 and Q2 buffer the transformer output impedance to provide large current pulses to charge and discharge the gate of a FET connected across the output.

 

Figure 3: With a few more parts, you can build an isolated driver.

(click here to enlarge.)

 

     This circuit is extremely effective with a 50% duty cycle input (see lower drive signal in Figure 3) as it will drive the gate of the FET negative and provide rapid turn-off, minimizing switching losses. This makes it ideal for the phase-shifted full-bridge converter.

     If you are using an upper-drive waveform of less than 50% (Figure 3), consider snubbing the transformer. This helps to avoid inadvertently turning the FET on due to ringing after the transitions. A low-to-zero transition may cause the leakage inductance and secondary capacitance to ring and produce a positive voltage out of the transformer.

     To summarize, discrete drivers can save you money. About $0.04 worth of discretes can replace over ten times that much cost in driver ICs. The discrete drivers are capable of providing drive currents in excess of 2A and allow you to move power out of the control IC. Also, they remove the high switching currents from the control ICs, which can improve regulation and noise performance.

     Please join us next month when we will continue our discussion of simple FET gate drive circuits and look at synchronous rectifier drives.

 

For more information about this and other power solutions, visit: www.ti.com/power-ca

About the author
Robert Kollman is a Senior Applications Manager and Distinguished Member of Technical Staff at Texas Instruments. He has more than 30 years of experience in the power electronics business and has designed magnetics for power electronics ranging from sub-watt to sub-megawatt with operating frequencies into the megahertz range. Robert earned a BSEE from Texas A&M University, and a MSEE from Southern Methodist University.




Editor's note: Liked this? Want more?

If you are interested in "power" issues such as components; efficiency; thermal concerns; AC/DC and DC/DC supply topologies; batteries; supply ICs; complete supplies; single- and multi-rail management; and supply monitoring: then go to the Power Management Designline home page here for the latest in design, technology, trends, products, and news. Also, sign up for our weekly Power Management Designline Newsletter here.





EREBUS

12/10/2011 8:42 PM EST

Well done. Thanks for reminding us that a simple solution can solve a lot of problems for lower cost. Engineers sometimes get too wrapped up in looking at the newest devices, that we don't stop and "engineer" a easier design.

Sign in to Reply



zeeglen

12/14/2011 7:57 PM EST

Nice, enjoy your articles.

BTW, if anyone tries to simulate the circuit of Figure 1, be aware it needs a long time-constant capacitive load (as mentioned in the article text but not shown in the schematic) to represent the FET gate. Otherwise, results can be strange. Had me scratching my head for a couple minutes. Interesting also to drive with a sine wave and monitor individual transistor current.

Sign in to Reply



bcarso

12/15/2011 12:08 PM EST

Well that you qualified the transformer circuit as appropriate to phase-shift systems, as it will get very strange when a significant deviation from a 50% duty cycle is attempted! But otherwise it's a great little circuit, and the observation about the benefit of a negative gate drive is pertinent.

The challenges of highside drive with variable duty cycles I hope will be addressed soon. I look forward to future installments.

Brad Wood

Sign in to Reply



bearchow

12/19/2011 11:41 AM EST

In my past experience using this buffer in class D audio amplifiers I discovered an intriguing detail. Putting a 2k resistor between base and emitter of the transistors will considerably speed them up. Part of my research revealed that 2k is a nearly ideal number. The resistor is bootstrapped so it has minimal loading effect.

Sign in to Reply



WKetel

1/4/2012 5:50 PM EST

I have seen versions of the circuit in figure one providing tens of amps in different applications. It is not a new circuit, but it certainly would be potentially a very good choice in the application described. So thanks for reminding us again that an elegant solution does not have to be either complex or brand new. Sometimes simple works very well.

Sign in to Reply



Winfield Hill

1/5/2012 11:00 AM EST

That's a commonly used and suggested technique, but generally we assume the transistors are somewhat less capable, forgetting that when acting as boosters to a wimpy driver, they're getting plenty of base drive, so only need a beta of 10 or so. Thanks, Robert!

The '2222 and '2907 are better dies than the '3906, etc. The common jellybean plastic versions are the 2n4401 and '4403, and their mmbt sot-23 counterparts. The Zetex parts are even better yet, but perhaps much better than needed, more expensive and not second sourced.

The Diodes, Inc. mmdt2227M is pretty cool - it packs the NPN and PNP transistors together in one sot-23-6 package. 5-cents each at Arrow.

Sign in to Reply



Fabio007

1/5/2012 8:55 PM EST

Good article! I have used these circuits over the last 20 years with good results. For figure 3 just be careful of the "first pulse syndrome": when power is first applied the capacitors are at zero volts! ie: don't make the capacitors too large.

@bearchow: yes, a resistor connected across base-emitter (only one is required for the NPN/PNP buffer) can be useful.

For extra output current, I have used a resistor in the collector ckt of each of the voltage-follower transistors to then drive the BE junction of a complementary transistor (or drive the G-S in case of a MOSFET) with its collector (or drain) connected to the output (ie: the emitter-follower pair drive a common-emitter pair - this avoids the extra Vbe drop you would get with a second emitter-follower pair) - this is where that resistor across BE is really useful. (Sorry, I don't know how to upload a picture!) This arrangement generates heaps of drive current but need to be careful of stability.

Sign in to Reply



Cubrilo

11/23/2012 12:23 AM EST

Very good article, but misses a very important detail when describing the schematic in Figure 1: "a 50Ω source and was loaded with a 0.01 µF capacitor connected in series with a 1Ω resistor..." What is the value of the voltage Vcc? "...shows that the MMBT2222A is capable of sourcing almost 3A..." Yes, but capable at what voltage: 5V, 15V, 25V - it makes BIG difference!

Sign in to Reply



Please sign in to post comment

Navigate to related information

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)