Design Article
Power Tip 46: Time your synchronous-buck FETs properly
Robert Kollman, Texas Instruments
4/13/2012 3:45 PM EDT
(Editor's note: Power Tips is an ongoing series; to see a linked list of all entries from #1 to the latest one, click here.)
In this Power Tip, we investigate the importance of timing between the high-side and low-side FET gate drives in a synchronous buck regulator. Timing optimization is becoming increasingly important as engineers strive to eke out the best possible efficiency in their power supply.
There are two transitions during the switching period: the turn-on of the low-side switch, and the turn on of the high–side switch. The low-side turn-on switch is critical because the transition is almost lossless, or a “free ride.” After the high-side switch turns off, the inductor current drives the switch-node voltage losslessly to ground. The best time to turn on the low-side switch is at the end of transition.
It is not critical if the body diode conducts a short time before the low side turns on, as it does not lead to reverse recovery loss. Any excess carriers in the junction dissipate before the next switching transition.
However, there is excess conduction loss, if the current remains in the body diode for too long. Timing the high-side FET turn-on is the most important transition. An early turn-on results in shoot-through losses due to cross-conduction with the low-side FET. A late turn-on leads to additional conduction loss and injects excess carriers in the low-side FET body diode, which must be recovered. In either case, efficiency degrades.
To characterize efficiency as a function of timing between drive signals, I constructed power supplies with adjustable delays on the driver signals. I then evaluated efficiency versus delay times. Figures 1A, 1B, and 1C show the results.
Figure 1A shows when the high-side FET is turned on before the low-side FET is fully off. An extended Miller region is apparent in the low-side gate drive where the low-side and high-side FETs are both on simultaneously, causing shoot-through current in the power stage. When the low-side FET finally turns off, there is additional voltage overshoot on the switch node.

Figure 1A: Advanced high-side timing creates shoot-through.
(Click here for enlarged image)
In Figure 1B, the high-side FET is turned on after the low-side FET is off and current has built in the body diode. When the high-side FET is turned on, it recovers the body diode and you would expect a spike of current to ring the switch node voltage. However, that is not evident due to the extremely short reverse recovery times (12 nS) of the MOSFET body diode used. Slower body diodes create significant ringing.

Figure 1B: Body diode conducts with high-side drive delayed.
(Click here for enlarged image)
Figure 1C
provides the best power-supply efficiency. The low-side gate voltage
drops to near ground before the high-side switch is turned on. The
high-side is turned on before the lower body diode conducts, and switch node ringing is minimized.

Figure 1C: Optimum timing improves efficiency and lowers stress.
(Click here for enlarged image)
Figure 2 presents the efficiency curve for a 12V to 1V/15A, 300 kHz power stage as the gate-drive timing is varied. The left side of the scale represents early turn-on of the high-side switch, (Figure 1A). The right side represents a delayed high-side gate drive (Figure 1B). On the left, there is a drastic fall-off in efficiency due to shoot-through current losses in the power stage. On the right, there is a gradual fall in efficiency.

Figure 2: Driver timing can drastically impact efficiency.
There are two causes for the gradual fall: conduction loss and reverse recovery loss from the low-side FET body diode. During diode conduction, there is about a 0.7 volt drop across the body diode. During the diode conduction time the maximum possible power supply efficiency is shown in Equation 1 as approximately:

If the diode conducts for 50 ns out of a 3 μs period, this has about 1.2 percent impact on overall efficiency. With this power stage, the reverse recovery loss is insignificant since MOSFETs with low-reverse recovery times of 12 nS are used.
To summarize, properly timing of gate-drive signals in a synchronous-buck design is critical for maximizing efficiency. The timing should minimize the low-side FET body-diode conduction time. The high-side FET turn-on is the most critical transition and you should avoid turn-on before the low-side is completely off. This minimizes switching losses while it reduces voltage ringing during transition.
For a more detailed discussion on this topic, refer to “Predictive Gate Drive Boost Synchronous DC/DC Power Converter Efficiency,” Application Note (SLUA281), Texas Instruments, April 2003.
Join us next month when we discuss a method for EMI reduction in offline power supplies.
For more information about this and other power solutions, visit: www.ti.com/power-ca.
About the author
Robert Kollman is a Senior Applications Manager and Distinguished Member of Technical Staff at Texas Instruments. He has more than 30 years of experience in the power electronics business and has designed magnetics for power electronics ranging from sub-watt to sub-megawatt with operating frequencies into the megahertz range. Robert earned a BSEE from Texas A&M University, and a MSEE from Southern Methodist University.Editor's note: Liked this? Want more?
If you are interested in "power" issues such as components; efficiency; thermal concerns; AC/DC and DC/DC supply topologies; batteries; supply ICs; complete supplies; single- and multi-rail management; and supply monitoring: then go to the Power Management Designline home page here for the latest in design, technology, trends, products, and news. Also, sign up for our weekly Power Management Designline Newsletter here.


agk
4/14/2012 4:12 AM EDT
A brief and important analysis about the low side and high side FET when used as a switch.This is used in many applications including electronic ballasts. This analysis to be included in the R&D labs libraries.Also usable to reduce the radiations and go for EMI certification.
Sign in to Reply
sharps_eng
4/14/2012 9:06 AM EDT
Can I add that designers do not have an easy way to time the gate drive in a reliable, low-cost circuit. No one device or circuit has appeared that fixes this problem at the right price and reliability point. I have seen many circuits loaded with hand-tweaked RC networks.
If you read carefully you can spot that this article is talking about a buck converter, but using terms like hi-side and lo-side which are normally associated with H-bridges. In H-bridges, timing is a symmetric problem and turning on the lo-side is equally critical.
The synchronous FET pair in this buck converter can also easily have such a symmetric mode, depending on the design parameters.
Sign in to Reply
Sanjib.Acharya
4/14/2012 3:24 PM EDT
For synchronous buck topology I have used of the shelf PWM chips, which usually have built in optimization of ON/OFF timing between the hi-side and lo-side switches...not much to do with manual tuning.
Sign in to Reply
Rodneyluo8
4/16/2012 7:17 AM EDT
where is the schemaic diagram
Sign in to Reply
BicycleBill
4/16/2012 11:45 AM EDT
There is no single schematic here to show, it depends on what you are driving--the point here is to show you what you need to be aware of when doing a circuit. It's not a "cookbook" situation, unfortunately.
Sign in to Reply
MrPWM
4/16/2012 10:23 PM EDT
The timing of the upper switch turn-on is helped by a few factors. For example, as we can see in Robert's figure 1C, the gate voltage is at a low level anyhow if the upper switch turns on too early. This limits the possible amount of shoot-through. More importantly, both Spice and O-scope plots have showed me that the parasitic source inductance plays a critical role in lowering shoot-through. High di/dt across Ls in the lower switch "pushes" the gate voltage higher even though the G-S voltage is falling, and is often mistaken for a Miller plateau. The upward rise in V-gate in figure 1A is this very effect. Remember: Vgate is not the same as Vgate-source.
D. Hambley, SENTEK Engineering
Sign in to Reply
gayatrikumar_1
4/26/2012 10:26 AM EDT
Some Drivers Do have Programmable Dead time to prevent shoot-through. How ever this limits the usable duty cycle range.
Robert has considered 12:1 buck reg, which is one of the difficult examples. This timing problem becomes more important when we need to achive duty cycles down to 1%
Sign in to Reply
kjdsfkjdshfkdshfvc
2/3/2013 3:58 AM EST
Why is the full linked list of all tips in the series a PDF file??? I can't even use that on some of my mobile devices, but I can read the articles.
The absurdity of a PDF file is clear when you see that for the next tip you have to change it, and I have to re-download it (or if I get busy and miss a few, I come back want to catch up, I need to download a PDF)
Why isn't that just a link to a home page for the Power Tips Series on eetimes.com ? On that home page is the hyperlinks to other articles in the series.
Sign in to Reply
kjdsfkjdshfkdshfvc
2/3/2013 4:00 AM EST
sorry, in my annoyance at the PDF, I forgot to mention that the Series is a favorite of mine, absolutely a wealth of quality information that is hard or impossible to find or know without the experience you clearly have. I am continually learning from you, thanks, but just hate the PDF :)
Sign in to Reply